Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
25 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2Pentylheptanol
1 year ago

In the sense of what I find most interesting or taking into account the current state of technology?

If you mean the second, I will definitely take the moon as a trip to another planet would take months to years. I have the idea of being alone in space for as long as possible and even if it were possible, it would always be very dangerous.

But if I could safely and easily visit any place in the universe, I would probably opt for some planet outside the solar system.

TomRichter
1 year ago

If there is no planet, the journey is only short and the way back is halfway secured.

Strafe06533
1 year ago

Hey,

I would visit Mars as I could survive this trip than the other planets.

Mars is more life-friendly than the others, if you get the cold, thirst, atmosphere, etc. Way thinks.
Mars could have had water many thousand years ago and looked identical to the earth, possibly there was also life.

well I would personally like to visit Mars or Neptune but that would be a trip without return 😅

muckel3302
1 year ago

Certainly after Earth the most interesting planet

Jespa666
1 year ago

Because of the travel time, the moon would be enough for me.

Journey time Mars: 6 months and 21 days

Travel duration Neptun: 12 years and 5 days

Journey time Saturn: 6 years, 8 months and 17 days

I only get 30 days of vacation a year. 😑

20Fragender00
1 year ago

I’d like to travel to Uranus and examine him thoroughly.

2Pentylheptanol
1 year ago
Reply to  20Fragender00

At least you could not land on Uranus with the current state of technology, as it is a gas planet. You’d just fall in there.

Deneuker99
1 year ago

then I can jump very far

MenschDNA
1 year ago

Nice warm. You can get the most sun.

DerBayer80
1 year ago
Reply to  MenschDNA

Not really. The cloud cover is so dense that hardly sunlight comes to the surface

Bushmills145
1 year ago

The least anti-life of those mentioned.

DerBayer80
1 year ago

The moon is not a planet. Just like Pluto is not a real planet anymore. But you should know that as a willing teacher

DerBayer80
1 year ago

No. That is clearly defined. I’d like to help you:

How is a planet defined?

A planet is a spherical sky object in which, in contrast to a star like our sun, no thermonuclear fusion processes take place. Planets circle around a central star and move on elliptical or circular paths.

How is a moon defined?

Moons, also called satellites, in contrast to planets are not about stars (or suns), but about planets. They are also not as large as planets, but significantly smaller than the planet they are moving (unless one would speak of a double planet).

And this to Pluto, who is a dwarf planet:

What is a dwarf planet just explained?

Dwarf planets are celestial bodies on a orbit around a star. They have an approximately round shape due to their mass and their inherent gravity. They do not “free” their surroundings from other objects. The dwarf planets are not moons.

DerBayer80
1 year ago

Europe is also a moon of Jupiter. As I said, this is actually part of the slightly extended general education

DerBayer80
1 year ago

Again, no one can not involve the moon below, because it is not a planet but a moon. Or would you then call Ceres, Dheimos, Phobos, Styx, Ganymed, Europe, Eris, etc?

WECoyote
1 year ago

Two of the options are not planets.

Sonne1234567890
1 year ago

Neptun and Pluto

Janaki
1 year ago

Collect diamonds…

Maxi170703
1 year ago

Venus has a really cool atmosphere

tim75794
1 year ago

Uranus

tim75794
1 year ago

Mars