Which camera should I get as a beginner?
Hey, I'd like to start photography as a hobby. I'm a complete beginner and need help choosing the right camera.
I would like to do landscape and wildlife photography. It's important to me that the camera takes sharp images that I can share with others. I don't plan on shooting videos. I would prefer a mirrorless camera.
My budget for this would be around 600€ (maximum 700€)
It would be great if the camera came in a kit with a lens, as I need this too.
Thank you in advance for your help.
(3 votes)
Loading...
Sharp images make as good as any system camera, provided you meet the right settings. Here is the crunch point against a mobile phone: A system camera doesn’t do anything with a push of a button. Images are less saturated and less sharpened than in a mobile phone. And since the cameras do not have A.I. motif recognition, it happens much more often that the camera is etched in full automatic mode with settings. In this case, you need to know as a user what settings you need to meet or what mode you need to choose. So read tutorials or watch tutorials on the camera is almost mandatory.
For your budget, I would recommend a Sony A6000 or Canon EOS M50, you will find the 300€ without lens. The M50 is a bit more expensive but also offers advantages such as a fold-out touch screen. The kit lenses cost about 50€.
Used Sony Alpha A6000 | MPB
If you want to spend 600 to 700 euros and have a camera without a mirror, get a bridge camera. This is in this price class the eggs legendary wool milk sow, which can be anything you ask for for this price. You can photograph animals on a long distance, landscape, but also in indoor spaces or even insects. You don’t need any additional lenses (which often cost more than the camera) and you don’t need any additional technology. There’s everything you need.
https://www.idealo.de/preisvergleich/ProductCategory/12332.html
Every mirrorless makes sharp images. If the pictures do not get sharp, it is on the user and/or equipment unsuitable for special motives, especially AF. Landscape photos can also be made with kit objective.
When it comes to animal photos (aside from the pet), it is no longer enough. Whether macro or proper focal length for birds, mammals, etc. (about 400-600mm lens) you need one or more lenses and already with one you are about your budget.
If the 600 – 700 are intended only for the body, that is reasonable. Brand doesn’t matter. Because of the animals, I would only pay attention to a good autofocus, high serial image, usable buffer memory.
And don’t forget. It’s not done with camera and lens. A calibration device is also mandatory, as well as a usable monitor that covers sRGB. Camera bag, cleaning agents etc. Costs everything.
Hi.
very good cameras are Nikon but also Canon. With Nikon you can quickly take your photos with a few settings. The cameras can be equipped with different lenses and flashes like ring flashes.
Look in there. https://tidd.ly/48m84C8
I think you’ll find something!
Lg
What you’re saying is for every camera brand. It’s standard.
Nikon is easy to use. You should have a little more experience with Canon. That’s what I found.
At Nikon it was easier to choose the programs. If you had a Canon 10D example, you had to change a lot that it was broadcasting. Sure, a professional knows where he’s going. It’s a matter of experience!
That’s exactly what I wanted to do. Nikon and Canon are good, but everyone has to decide what to do.
I would suggest you go to a shop of cameras. Look at the operation on Sony, Nikon, Canon & Co. Where you find yourself best, it’s taken. Or you can look at test reports on YouTube.
I could work better with a Nikon again. This is just like the question: Windows or Linux – there are also different answers.
I’m not getting clear with Nikon. Canon’s simple.
Each brand is easy to use when you get used to the menu. Especially since you can always apply keys accordingly.