Welche Kamera für 1000 euro kaufen?

ByTyp2006

Moin

Werde bald ein gutbezahlten Minijob machen wollte mir dann vom geld eine neue Kamera kaufen

Gerade hab ich noch die canon eos 700d ( eher eine schlechte kamera (kein 4k und schlechstes low light verhältnis aber hab ich zum Geburtstag mal Bekommen)

Bildqualität ist mir sehr wichtig und ein guter Bildstabilisator sollte sein

Was habt ihr als vorschläge

(3 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Kann jeder Bürgergeld bekommen?

ByKanon027

Hallo, wenn man Bürgergeld erhält und dazu auch noch arbeitet, aber das Einkommen nicht zur Deckung der Lebenskosten ausreicht, wird das Einkommen auf die Bürgergeldleistungen angerechnet. Wenn bspw eine Person einschließlich der Miete 1200€ Ausgaben hat aber nur 800€ verdient, würde er 400€ Bürgergeld bekommen. Der Einfachheit halber bitte ich, die Freibeträge zu ignorieren. Ist…

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Uneternal
Uneternal
2 years ago

Cameras with image stabilizer in the price range becomes difficult. Would rather think about a gimbal when it comes to videos. There is absolutely no image stabilizer that can replace a gimbal.

rather a bad camera (no 4k and smart low light ratio but I got for my birthday time

How far does 4K have to do with good or bad now? It’s just a resolution. If you’re bad in recording videos, use 4K nix, then look just as shit, only with more resolution.

If you want good low-light, less the camera is due (the 700d has a good sensor) but probably more likely that you use the Popel kit lens instead of a strong light.

Conclusion: Put your money into a gimbal and lighter lenses then also ne 700D.

2
IXXIac
IXXIac
2 years ago

Hello

if you want to stay with Canon just keep saving and waiting until the EOS R7 prices drop and there are reasonable RF S optics. Previously, Canon has the same problems as the competition from S35 sensor format for the combined Stabi in video, which will probably only be solved with the introduction of the Global Shutter. While Sony shows at the FX3 that it can be made in the professional field in “Active Mode” with small image at least with Sony Cine Zooms.

If you buy an active gimball and loop around, the EOS R10 is well stabilized enough.

If you want to make Run & Gun with S35 format at UHD, there is only the Fuji X S-10 or Fuji X T3 for Body eh. The XF 16-80 is more suitable for video than the XF 18-55. But the Tamron 17-70/2.8 RXD VC “stumbles” in the performance between XF 16-55 and XF 16-80. Although it is not entirely the resolution hammer of the XF 16-55 in the case of a stand image, it remains to be seen whether Tamron can still rework during the gearing of VC and IBIS or Fuji will deliberately block/prevent it. But the Tamron 17-70 is very interesting for video (almost Parfocal, little Breathing or Focusshift, hardly Ramping)

In addition, the Fuji Trans X sensors at High ISO are clearly the benchmark you just need to understand the Trans X technology because of the debayering of video in the Zwickmühle or has too little computing power for 4K MPEG4 Out of Cam. MPEG5 could solve the problem. To date, professionals make it a LOG video and a post-process. Watch video clips from Fuji DSLM technology at Nolans Dunkirk. The new H2 comes with Blackmagic Video RAW compression possibly through firmware to the bottom

Otherwise, an EFS 17-55/2.8 IS USM increases the image quality, the Bokeh and the AF speed of a 700D at mid-range to top-class level even more resolution and Bokeh have Sigma Art 18-35/1.8 HSM and 50-100/1.8 HSM

0