Was waren die Kosten und die CO2-Bilanz von Baerbocks missglückter Australienreise?
Sonntagabend: Von Berlin mit Regierungsjet nach Abu dhabi, dort sollte aufgetankt werden und nach Australien weiter
Montag sehr früh: Missglückter Start der Weiterreise in Abu dhabi, Regierungsjet muss 80 Tonnen Kerosin ablassen
Montag Aufenthalt in Abu Dhabi
Montag abend: erneuter Versuch mit dem Regierungsflieger weiter zu fliegen, erneut erfolglos, nochmal 80 Tonnen Kerosin abgelassen
Dienstag: Reise wird abgebrochen, Linienflug zurück nach Hamburg
(2 votes)
Loading...
To calculate the Co2 output is almost impossible.
It would be necessary to know the utilisation, the weight, the aircraft model, data such as the weather (e.g. wind), the exact flight distance, etc. So a really reliable statement is not possible. The government flyer will probably return again, of course the same applies here. Of course, due to the number of passengers, the per capita output would have to be significantly higher.
Fuel consumption also lacks the above data. In addition, the pilots are still refueling the quantity necessary for the route. This is a rule on the one hand, on the other. What this then costs is hard to say as long as you don’t know how much kerosene did the machine. Lastly, of course, there are other costs, such as parking fees on air carriers, start and landing fees and other things.
You can’t just say it. But what you can say is a serious blamage. The A340 with the Bearbock wanted to fly is many years old and should be put out of service this year. The minister should have just taken another plane.
Edit: Aircraft age corrected.
no, it’s been over 20 years old but only for 12 years in operation for the Federal Government
It makes more sense, after 12 years, an Airbus should not be in the bucket that you have to pull it out. But did not find the label of the machine on the Internet and then referred to a press statement regarding the age.
Regardless of the CO 2 balance, this “failed” trip to Australia is a huge debacle for the reputation of politicians, here a “green” foreign minister. From my point of view, this greatly diminishes the reputation of the Green Party, which a politician has put into the race, which makes the moral claims and values of their own party representatives and clientele (whether “to blame” or “innocent”) appear unworthy due to this incident. Although Ms. Baerbock is not responsible for the pilot arm, I believe that she is responsible for contributing to the deterioration of CO2 balance due to her official activity. And in this case in an exorbitant way, as it is an enormous waste of resources and environmental damage.
There are not only costs for kerosene and for the scheduled flight ticket, there are also airport charges for each start and for each landing, probably also parking/or. Standing fees, but I’m not sure.
I’ll tell you the Co2 balance is not that good, of course, but something like that happens every day. I don’t see the problem on the plane, which isn’t that old either. The problem is in my eyes that the plane has not been properly maintained and maintained.
But I already find it a blamage that you did not find any ways to continue flying with another jet of the Bundeswehr.
and there’s always a reason to fuck.
If she hadn’t flown, it would suck a rotten…