Was ist haltbarer HDD oder SSD?
Dass SSD (ohne mechanische Bewegung) deutlich schneller sind als HDD ist klar; aber was ist haltbarer?
Früher hies es, dass die Anzahl der Schreibzyklen von SSD-Speicherzellen begrenzt ist. Heute werden SSD auch als Boot-Platte, auf der häufig Schreibzyklen (durch das Betriebssystem) stattfinden, eingesetzt.
Muss man deshalb bei SSD mit einem früheren Ausfall rechnen als bei HDD?
In the end, no one really fits your answers:
Chip-based data carriers need to be regularly supplied with power so that the data is maintained. This is not the problem with an internal SSD in a PC now. – and “regular” would mean here every 1 to 2 years.
ABER: For archive disks, this could be problematic if you forget.
In short: The magnetism of HDDs definitely lasts very long – and of course without power supply.
There can be no real long-term experience regarding SSDs – especially since the technology is developing rapidly.
This is still the case – and depending on the technology, the number of writing cycles is even decreasing.
Anyway:
Anyone who does not make backups must not complain about data loss – or hope for Empathie Pages Admins/Profis.
In general, the SMART values should always be kept in mind for all types of disks.
In normal operation? Nope.
Of course, taking into account the specs of the respective data carrier.
Under the condition that it is also used regularly.
A SSD is unused in the cabinet. She’s broken. However, an HDD can be stored in the cabinet and it will probably work even in 10 years without problems.
But using a SSD is much more durable and reliable
Does this also apply to frequent writing cycles?
Here’s an explanation. Didn’t want to write everything yourself:
Absolutely. Ne HDD uses more and more of a rough word sooner or later.
A SSD does it rather well when it has to do regularly with writing and reading data.
Like I said. The SSD only harms this without being used.
Yeah, that’s just right. It was just improved. Here too, a brief explanation is as simple as we always text:
I’m not really up to date anymore, but:
In principle, the data are stored in an SSD by bringing electrons to a gate isolated from the remainder. And this insulation decreased at least with the previous SSD with the number of write cycles, so that the information could no longer be stored reliably.
Is this different today? new technology?
Or are the number of possible cycles so high that it is uncritical?
Meanwhile, SSDs are more durable than HDDs, yet you can always have bad luck and get an SSD that gets a defect prematurely.
Therefore important data min. 1x secure elsewhere, best secure even in 2x other places.
The SSD allegedly do not last as long as HDD; but this does not shorten the durability of the PC because you can use a new hard drive.
100000% 2 HDDs have already died with me that have been replaced by SATA SSDs and I never had problems again
but on SSDs you will hopefully not want to archive data 😀
Why? Besides, I don’t have so many data I don’t use or can’t leave on my SSDs
Because less mechanical parts, if it is a high quality brand product
drop a SSD and a 1 meter height HDD on stone floor. If the HDD still works, I am impressed.
That wasn’t my point.
An HDD can be described at least theoretically infinitely often, since the quality of the magnetic storage does not depend on the number of cycles.
In the SSDs there were at least initially a number of write cycles, from which the write quality became worse and worse.
That can still be the case, nothing lasts forever. And there are still 1000 other ways why even SSD’s might fail.
Therefore, even with SSD’s, fuses should be made.