What is grammatically correct?
Russia has had this experience.
Russia has had the experience.
(1 votes)
Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Is this a big deal?
Byutope66
"The young study participants showed significantly more and more frequent symptoms of addiction than the older ones." I'm talking about the older part, I mean it's an adjective, it has to be written in lowercase, right?
How old is Chinese really?
I once read that it is supposedly 6,000 years old.
How do you evaluate a cladogram?
I need to be able to analyze a cladogram like this for a biology exam, but our teacher is incompetent. I really need everything, even the basics. For example, an analysis of ape-human relationships would be great.
At a fast pace or at a fast pace?
Which is correct? Is both possible? What is the grammatical and semantic difference?
Difference between schizophrenic, schizotypal, schizoid and schizoaffective?
Can someone explain to me in understandable terms what the differences are between the above-mentioned conditions? Brief definitions of the terms would also be helpful ð
Russia has had the experience.
This sentence we by a German native speaker with quite probability than at least expressed.
Why? Experience is something abstract complex that you have in mind for a very long time. It’s nothing you have, and after a year it’s forgotten again. Then it would be just a snapshot of the sensation and not a real experience you have made.
Both sentences are grammatically correct, but the first set âRussia has made the experienceâ sounds more natural and is used more frequently.
Both, it comes to the context, because the formulations express different things and not the same.
Depends on the context. Of course, the former is more common, if the sentence goes on, so
“Russia has made the experience that ….”
So do I. I would only accept “experiences” as definitive justification and determination, e.g. in:
âPlease let the Chef/Master/Captain decide. He has the (corresponding) experience. â
Hey!
In the case of “doing experience” the emphasis lies on the action/the event, while in the case of “experience” the emphasis lies on the experience as a result. In the case of explanations and representations of the experience and processes, as indicated here, “making” helps.
So also the difference between “make” and “have”.
This is objective explanation. :
Yeah, all right!
Yeah, you’re right. Here is the point: .
Do I have to do another after the point?ð
“Prep. + battery” is not a set. This is not an answer to the question “Where (…)?”, just a note on grammar.
Children like you.
I don’t have the three seconds. ð
If you take the grammar so accurately:
There’s no point. A grammatically correct set is terminated at least with one point. You can do that if you explain something to others, don’t you? ð
Bullshit. You should already invest the three seconds in order to surpass the sentence and to eliminate grammatical errors, especially if you think you need to explain to another how the language works.
I’m annoying again. You don’t know the saying, “Who doesn’t need to use it, doesn’t need to use it at all”? We always heard that when we had to forget that. ðĪŠ
I know that sounds weird. If you write quickly, you can’t pay attention to everything. Then you don’t need to bother. In common:
Yes, all clear, E. make = action –> E. have = result.
The emphasis is on the Action. Question: Where lies x? + Dativ
Hello!
“Russia has made the experience” is often used to point out a particular action or event, while “Russia has had the experience” places more focus on the state resulting from this experience.
In many cases, the two formulations are interchangeable, but there could be situations in which a formulation appears more natural or more suitable, depending on what should be emphasised. ECT
Correct are both.
Best regards from Maxime! ð