Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
66 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Christiangt
7 months ago

At the moment, I don’t think the risk is so high to lose my job or find no new one.

I therefore see the risk as a self-employed hoeher.

BackupBone
7 months ago

Rich in risk is self-employment. Pleite, misinvestment. You never arrive at the market. etc. you can suddenly lose everything.

Being hired basically only has the risk that the career does not give up what you hoped for. Job loss (by fimenpleite or dismissal) can now be intercepted without great losses to the new employer.

Conclusion: The chances are higher in self-employment, the risk is completely overthrown but also.

BackupBone
7 months ago
Reply to  Enterpreneur

This is my subjective opinion.

SirKermit
7 months ago
Reply to  BackupBone

Rich in risk is self-employment. Pleite, misinvestment.

In addition, because many do not understand this: liability questions can also drive one into bankruptcy, possibly also punished, such as bankruptcy (depending on legal form).

However, there is also an employee liability, that should never be forgotten in return. This is, roughly formulated, significantly milder, but existent.

In the case of an individual company, even the private existence is affected, by the way with a GbR. Only one keeps the head for others, not only one’s own.

Job loss (by fimenpleite or dismissal) can now be intercepted without great losses to the new employer.

The emphasis should be on these days, and the labour market looked different a few years ago.

Niemandmann
7 months ago

The boss has a scarcely measurable mental stress, but he is responsible for an “imperium”. I wouldn’t want to do that. And if he privately cultivates a somewhat luxurious change of life, then the economy is not at all important. The fates of his employees are greatly affected by bankruptcy. LG

Niemandmann
7 months ago
Reply to  Enterpreneur

I’d rather be an employee.

8275Thomas
7 months ago

…as an employee, you don’t have to worry about anything, have regular free and leave, bear little responsibility and are safe from the front to the back – even if you’re sick, the salary goes on. If you don’t have a bock anymore – the next job is waiting. You can’t do anything.

You don’t have that in self-employment. As owner you are responsible for everything and bear the entrepreneurial risk – the market collapses, customers break away or don’t pay – all your problem – you have to go on.

8275Thomas
7 months ago
Reply to  Enterpreneur

Objective and subjective.

Being employed is extremely risk-free.

BucksRebirth
7 months ago

Your goals may change, with 20 years you think there are other things.

8275Thomas
7 months ago

So to your subjective risk:)

A lot of success in achieving targets.

8275Thomas
7 months ago

Perhaps I have reached my goals:) And whether this has been done or done independently, you can think of yourself.

So you’re talking about goals, not about risks – then write it like that!

8275Thomas
7 months ago

…maybe we have different definitions of risk.What is the risk of an employee or which of these risks do you have as a self-employed person?

Theophilus77326
7 months ago

Since I was both, I can say that it doesn’t make any difference because most people have the stuff to both.

Theophilus77326
7 months ago
Reply to  Enterpreneur

I also thought that the majority are not raised to self-employment.

Theophilus77326
7 months ago

Certainly.

christl10
7 months ago

It’s very risky if you don’t know.

As an employee, you have zero risk and a fixed and secure income. A self-employed person can only dream of this. The fact that one can earn significantly more by self-employment is out of question, but that does not reach everyone and some even go to Pleite.

Anson12
7 months ago

As a boss, you have certain responsibility and usually have to know everything you do in your own company. Of course, a boss earns more than an employee, for that, employees get safe salary and more leisure

DerHans
7 months ago
Reply to  Enterpreneur

The head of a company with 1000 employees can know the expertise

However, I have not yet seen a “self-employed” who has founded a company with 1000 employees away from the place.

Anson12
7 months ago
Reply to  Enterpreneur

Of course, the boss has to know everything. Because whoever runs a company has to take on certain responsibility and things that the boss can’t do in his own shop shouldn’t be boss or even don’t think about becoming self-employed. Accounting is even very important in your own store and that every boss should be thoroughly involved, even if a tax advisor is helpful. This has been so for a long time and a lot of calculations and good communication also belongs to it. You shouldn’t underestimate the skills as a boss. There’s nix just leaning on the boss’s armchair, and workers watch tralala and cash.

You don’t have much more free time.

Depends on where you work. Anyone who is employed as a manager or manager can find something else and only in large companies. Normal workers are more likely to stick to 40h a week or 48h

Anson12
7 months ago

All right. Then you just have any fantasies in the suitcase on the parat and pretend you’re millionaires without working properly with brains. Don’t talk to me if you’re so successful, yet just underestimate the ability and tell any dirt without a clear mind, boss doesn’t have to be good, just hints to just tell nonsense and just indicate you’re Rich. No wonder why no one can take your jelly seriously and have seen enough people with the same contributions anyway. Most likely you are the same user, only new account and always tell the same crap

Anson12
7 months ago

You’re funny. I don’t know about entrepreneurship.

The one who has never met a real boss before and never knows what kind of preconception a real boss has is you.

No, you shouldn’t. Accountant and he’s supposed to do this. It’s just gone to DUMM when you deal with it. Someone who runs such a company will go down. But how do you know?

Dumme bosses would be if you don’t know what he’s doing in the store and just have to take over the boss thing for jmd others.

You don’t have to tell me what it looks like, you’ve got 0 Zero Nada.

Again a next Toastbrot post, where only Hartz 4 snorrers have labed and never worked

It also depends on the entrepreneur. Know some few who work less than VZ forces.

It’s a clear sign that you’re a bad boss or you don’t get to the boss.

Are you again an 18-year-old trader who can only specify as a self-employed person for nix do coal and make fun of workers because they are not independent?

DerHans
7 months ago

Do you have an APPLICATION, what a good accountant costs? One bad you can remember

DerHans
7 months ago

Most sog. “self-employed” who write in this way are so close to their resources that they can’t get a tax advisor LEISTEN. If they even have a FINDEN.

malteabc
7 months ago

What is risky about it? Employees are very protected.

With self-employment, I always have to think where I get my customers.

malteabc
7 months ago
Reply to  Enterpreneur

Then you should write that you can’t do it as an employee.

But I don’t know how to have a lower risk as an entrepreneur.

Mohnblume611
7 months ago
Reply to  malteabc

So I’ve been thrown out 3x, protection back or forth. I think both are the same. An entrepreneurship has the advantage that one can realize oneself.

BucksRebirth
7 months ago

I don’t think…. he doesn’t hold it out

Pixelated
7 months ago

I’d rather be very silent.

BucksRebirth
7 months ago

I know what he’s going to deny it again… no matter how ridiculous it is.

Pixelated
7 months ago

That’s it.

BucksRebirth
7 months ago

Not “again someone “

It’s “He” again

JuraBoss05

Bruno00

TraderJoe455

Trade640

Usw…

malteabc
7 months ago

Then I’m self-employed.

BackupBone
7 months ago

A self-employment is not

Oh, he’ll soon give a contract…

malteabc
7 months ago

Oh, so…. Again, someone who means being rich without great use.

It’s not self-employment.

BackupBone
7 months ago

He operates trading with foreign capital

malteabc
7 months ago

You’ll hardly describe it here.

But with what you do business without risk, that is very interesting (if there is actually something about you).

malteabc
7 months ago

Why not? What is that statement? What’s wrong with you?

malteabc
7 months ago

There is no business without risk.

malteabc
7 months ago

A business without risk?! There isn’t that unless you’re heritage….

SaniOnTheRoad
7 months ago

Be hired or be the boss of your own company?

With everything I subsume under risk, I see this as a self-employed person higher.

SirKermit
7 months ago

There are many different types of risks. What exactly do you understand at risk?

SirKermit
7 months ago
Reply to  Enterpreneur

It’s high-risk.

Also a trade can be highly risky, that is not an argument. If you would claim your special way and your special business will allow you to reduce this risk, then I have no problem with such a statement at all.

But with your flatness to extend your special case from your point of view to all self-employed, I have one, because a self-employed MUST avoid such flat-rate judgments.

For

my dreams and goals

are yours, but never automatically other people.

SirKermit
7 months ago

Okay, I might have confused you with your old account. The then questions were very similar from my point of view.

DerHans
7 months ago

As an employee, you have the risk of being released, but then you have the right to AlG 1.

As a self-employed person, you work SELBST and STÄNDIG. Paid holiday is not available and 6 weeks are sick, means bankruptcy quickly.