Was hat man mit 100 Km/h auf der linken Spur zu suchen?
Wer langsam fahren will kann schließlich rechts fahren hinter LKW
Wer langsam fahren will kann schließlich rechts fahren hinter LKW
Muss der Fahrlehrer in und nach den Fahrstunden den Schüler über die Fragen in der praktischen Prüfung beleheren, bzw. erklären was man über die Reifen sagen sollte oder wo was im Motor ist, z.B. Bremsflüssigkeit, Scheibenwischwasser, muss er das tun? Oder zeigen wie man tankt? Bei mir hat er es bis jetzt nicht gemacht und…
Hallo, ich musste gestern mein Auto überbrücken, da ich leider über einen längeren Zeitraum das Licht angelassen habe. Nun habe ich gelesen dass man ungefähr eine halbe Stunde fahren sollte, damit das Auto auch beim nächsten Start wieder an geht. Jetzt frage ich mich allerdings, ob bei Kurzstrecken (z.B 10 min. zur Arbeit jeden Tag…
Guten Tag Leute, ich studiere Bauingenieurwesen, habe mein Praxissemester als Bauleiter hinter mir und wollte mal nach Interesse fragen was es bei welchen Unternehmen für Bauleiter-Wagen gibt bzw. welche Arten überhaupt so in Anwendung kommen. Natürlich in diesem Fall für die Jungbauleiter 🙂
Hallo, ich bin auf der Suche nach einem Traum gebrauchten Audi A3 Bj ab 2006,(Facelift Modell ) nach dem jetzigen Stand, gibt es die Fahrzeuge schon ab 4000 € allerdings haben die ne Laufleistung schon von über 200 tausend Kilometer auf der Uhr. Da ich keine richtige Ahnung mit Fahrzeugen habe, weiß ich nicht, ob…
Da ich jetzt bald meine Theorie Prüfung ablegen und auf dem Weg bin meine Praxis abzulegen versuche ich möglichst gut und viele Möglichkeiten auszuschließen durch die ich die Prüfung verhauen könnte das innerhalb und außerhalb der Fahrstunden. Da ich außerdem der Meinung bin das es der gemeine hilfreich sein könnte diese Dinge zu wissen um…
Doesn’t mean anything if it has a sufficient differential speed with respect to the track to the right of it and overtakes it.
If you are overtaken at a sufficient speed of difference, no one interferes with the change of track and, after the completion of the overhaul process, moves to the right again, nothing is wrong.
It doesn’t mean anything. There is no minimum speed on any track. If he overtakes one or more trucks, that’s the way
Partly there are minimum speeds
Yes, it is 60km/h to get onto the highway. But whether you’re driving 60 or not left to you. Also at mountain sites with the blue signs means only that you have to reach xxx km/h on the respective track, whether they will be against or not because it does not allow the traffic, for example.
Well, I’d like to have the one or the paragraphs that prescribes that.
And even a 275 is not fully binding, because the duty to take account of adversities is not suspended and weighs more strongly in case of doubt. Says the StVO even explicitly.
Well, okay. If you mean sign 275, it has been used for years only in special cases, but in principle it can be applied.
Please read my answer. You’re really messing up.
No confusion is like that.
Blue round sign with white writing
Many people like to confuse something here. See my current comment
My favorite wagon swallows over 100km/h so much (>23l /100km) that I don’t see it, I don’t think you’d see it either.
If I want to overtake a truck, I’ll overtake 100km/h.
Then why would I even want to overtake a truck?
The answer is simple: I like to drive forward (in the truest sense of the word).
The target speed of 130km/h is only a recommendation, no compulsion.
There are people who drive faster and there are people who drive slower. Live with it.
As long as no one arrives from behind with light horn, I also go chilly to the left.
It goes faster than to gurken behind the truck. And if you come, you can make a short break.
That means you’re constantly driving left and making room when the light horn comes from behind?
Depends on whether the highway is two or three lanes in each direction. In the case of three lanes, nothing has to be searched with only 100 km/h on the left lane, unless the route section is limited to 100 km/h for any reason. In the case of a two-track route, it is already a sufficient reason to drive left at 100 km/h for a short time if you overtake a truck and no one else stops on the left track, because vehicles on the left track, which are already in the term of overtaking, have priority over the vehicles that only switch to the left lane for overtaking. At least this should be so, but I have often experienced that some drivers are not familiar with traffic rules. However, if several trucks go one after the other to drive safely in between, it is legitimate to overtake them to the left of them at 100 km/h, which means on a two-track highway to overtake them on the left track. And last but not least, it also happens that some trucks overtake others that normally do not reach 100 km/h.
a trabant has a maximum speed of 100 km/h and can very well overtake a lkw… lasts hold ne
Otherwise he was called Galoppi.
have you been driving yourself?
Nonsense, it runs under normal conditions with up to 120 km/h. I had myself as my first 3 cars Trabant 601 and therefore know how much they had on it. In addition, I had a general overhauled engine in one of the three Trabis, with which the estimated 140 km/h with 4 people and full trunk was estimated – because Tachoskala in the Trabi goes up to 120 km/h without a stop. However, this was already limit value for the brakes.
jo…and I’m the Christmas man
I had several trabators at the start myself and still have a kübel in gst performance as a funmobile standing here
without changing the transmission ratio and tuning measures on the motor such a speed is not possible at all.
No problem if you overtake an 80 truck
And I thought, as a tax-paying driver, you always have the right to stimulus the maximum permissible speed.
Yes, as long as no one determines the speed at 100 km/h on the left track
They usually go a bit faster than 80 and then there’s a snoring nose with 100 on the way and hinders the complete traffic. I can’t.
Anyone who thinks as a tax-paying driver would always have the right to stimulate the maximum permissible speed, for which it seems to be.
But it’s a complete bull-endarm ejection. The STVO does not require a minimum speed on the motorway. (If you see this differently, I would like to mention the corresponding paragraphs in your opinion.*)
Various court rulings only say that you are overtaking at sufficient speed. Often there are 20 km/h, which should be the case in the case of cars with 100 km/h of truck with 80km/h).
PS: *Before the 60 km/h according to §18 para. 1 S.1 STVO comes: This is a prerequisite for using the motorway. No minimum speed.
Sure you can. Why shouldn’t that go?
So. Luckily, the humbug and lawn and dringer get their punishment 🤷🏻 ♂️
# you add a “must” in a suitable place to complete the sentence.
To the left, 160 is driven upwards. A veil in Fiat Panda has now lost nix. You don’t need runzuheule when you get a light horn
Do not have to tell me 🤷🏻 ♂️
Even if he would determine the speed: as long as he/she will overtake the other road users at a significant extra speed (which in the case of passenger cars is likely to be the case with 100 km/h of trucks with 80 km/h), this should be completely fine within the meaning of the STVO.
It is only not allowed to sit on the misbelief that a driver would always have a right to encourage the maximum permissible speed, which feels 90% of the motorized road users think.