What do you think of this idea of history?
A man who secretly runs a lab in his basement wants to create a mega badboy with his team by taking the genes of various men—for his voice, his looks, his abilities, and some character traits.
And yes, it's about cloning and hybridizing humans.
Not bad…
But why the hell would you want to do that? And what is the conflict?
People want to stop the geneticist?
Readers combine different expectations of stories.
You will find details of making an artificial being interesting.
Krimileser want a difficult case with many wrong ferries.
Many like me want a dramaturgy. So why is your researcher doing what he does? What is important to him? What happens to him if he doesn’t reach his goal?
What’s his opponent for a guy?
We’ll see no idea in your kitten
The only reason I fell in is that he wants to stall the girl or impress her.
But I decided to write this story and therefore I do not want to answer this question.
The Frankenstein principle… “dead idea.”! There have been 200 years and has never been filmed or written down in a book! ^^+gg *hust
And… what is it about? Do you follow for the complete length only as you describe how the researchers pipet and incubate in the laboratory? Because that sounds like that right now.
Is that something like a parody of the classic cotton pad swimboy/goodgirl romance?
Is it more in the direction of ScientistxCreation?
Or is it more about ethics of what the scientists do? And how the creation is?
I decided to write this story, so there is no answer to your questions.
What’s there doesn’t sound bad, but it’s kind of going on and I’m afraid that’s not going to interest me.