Was haltet ihr von diesem Artikel (KI)?
(2 votes)
Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Was bedeutet dieses befehl bei excel?
Würde gerne wissen was dieses befehl bei excel bedeutet 🙂
Hab eine HYPER X ALLOY ORIGINS und @ geht nicht?
ByKlomo
Hi, ich kann einfach kein @ schreiben muss das immer kopieren
Koryphäe in Informatik ohne Ausbildung?
Könnte man theoretisch eine Koryphäe in Informatik ohne eine Ausbildung oder Studium abgeschlossen zu haben, aber durch harter Arbeit mit Literaturbüchern und Programmierkenntnissen, die man sich selbst anereignet hat?
Verbindung zwischen PHP und SQL?
Hallo, am besten zeige ich euch erstmal was ich gemacht habe. Ich habe ein Login programmiert man kann die Daten eingeben jedoch kommt dann diese Fehlermeldung: Ich danke euch für eure Hilfe 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
So besides that this article is already very framed and has a low journalistic quality:
AI needs regulation, no development break. The politicians: they must finally start to adopt sensible laws for the digital age. I find it more critical that many AIs are closed source, so also ChatGPT (good research documents bring some insights into the AI). Nevertheless, the blackboxes should make transparent applications. It takes proper training so that the models work properly. But really fear – I mean – we don’t have to have this form of AI. I mean, currently, dangerous algorithms are already being used on social networks such as TikTok, Instagram and Co, which have proven to have a negative effect on society and individual individuals. There’s no one asking.
The same message from heise to somewhat better quality: https://www.heise.de/news/Tech-Prominence-requires-the-development of Riesen-KI models-8178216.html
I don’t know sooo from sticking to lay people, as far as I know this blackbox exists in a ki, do I? So it is even possible to eliminate the blackbox?
He certainly does not mean the exact approach of the AI, but the process as it was created and what is pure
In fact, the Internet did not go without open protocols. These are developed without company behind it and without profit. Apparently this works great, otherwise you wouldn’t be able to read this comment. Most of the software for users: inside is actually closed source. There are great alternatives that nobody uses. Free software often does not have the money to make known outside the tech bubble. By the way: almost every commercial application uses open-source libraries to work and 70% of the servers run on an open-source Linux kernel.
This may apply to small-medium things, but the biggest things are usually not closed? See Meta, Google,…
Why? Very much in IT is open to source and yet profitable.
If it were still the dead for the commercial AI progress, which is now the greatest (see Google and Open AI), if no one has any more commercial interest in an AI, it would only go a lot ahead.
The Internet and the digital world are based on open standards and standards. At the work of volunteers, communities and foundations. Without them, an iOS and an Android could probably not communicate. It should be the same with AI. AI does not have to serve commercial purposes, but to humanity. Everything else is a danger. At the internet it was like that and has developed in a different direction. Especially at AI, the free is also important. If, for example, a ChatGPT is used as an access to better information and easier working money, it remains deprived of certain groups and thus promotes socially-scientific differences. AI is a great tool, it’s the future. Only we have to make them right together and think about how to look. And this begins in politics, the beginnings must create a framework for development. A ban or a development break is too short.
Exactly
But it would be good to publish this, the dead for every economic AI research
Keep the stuff generally covered. These “tech geniuses” are, for the most part, a mix of people who want to be active or want to be in the area and have missed the train or people who have made a name half a century ago and have a name with AI nix.
This should not reduce the performance and co. these people but related to AI and this letter I find it wrong in place.
My Elon Musk, for example, wanted to join OpenAI, as he did with other companies like Tesla. But you were smart enough and let him flash off and now he wants a break?
I think you’d rather use the fear of people to make a little mood to have time to either take a little or find out how to benefit from it.
AI is also just a tool, even if a very powerful one that doesn’t focus on physical processes, but sometimes the field of knowledge, thought and co.
I find absolutely right that you create rules and laws here. The AI simply cannot spread so much as it is abused here too easily. You can see what is possible with the various AI programs. Some things are good and important, others are dangerous and must be regulated. You can otherwise, online in front of everything, no one can believe. It would already be a Klacks, reviews with pictures to fake by an AI. This makes shopping on Amazon and Co. even harder than already. Gives enough fake articles with just the same fake reviews. Thus, a bolt must be pushed forward.
The recently published video by MrWhostheboss fits about the future of the AI:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60LZ5Ie8XS8
But you can filter out KI’s content created by AI.
In addition, it’s about AI’s that are >=GPT 4 and that’s only very few and mostly, if not exclusively, Google or OpenAI if I’m not mistaken.
Wouldn’t be too bad for market leaders and take 6 months off where the competition can catch up (6months are not nothing)
Yeah, and that’s really fucking working. Even a few years ago, when the AI content was still very clearly generated AI, the other AI could not be filtered well. In the meantime, everything is so real that it doesn’t get AI, the FIlter AIs have a precision of 20-60%, that is..absolut shit. If you are under 50% accuracy, then you decide wrong with intention
“But you can filter out KI’s contents created.”
Yes, they are, but this will probably become more and more difficult in the future. For a layman, this will hardly be available. As Amazon already deals with the whole fake goods, they will take little care of fake reviews as long as the checkout rings. The same applies to other shops.
Yes, but regulations still have to come, otherwise there’s only total chaos in the net at some point.
But how can something be the example of what already exists? There are already thousands of fake reviews, and Amazon’s actions do not depend on the individual product but on the account.
As far as I know it has not been really important to have such an AI at all so far, so don’t know if it’s true but it can well imagine that there is still a lot of potential up there and so far it has not been supported.
I think AI is great. They work and we chills.
I think it would be more trusting if these people weren’t making millions with their demands.
It could be as if the demands had been specifically formulated in such a way that they can make the signatories themselves money, but they should be hindered in their competition.
I would find it better if people had no financial interest.
The requirement is 40 years old and also demands to prevent the 8th generation of computers.
Why? Because you can and there is no right to stupidity!
Unfortunately, does not answer the question a pity.
Lol, Elon is anything but a tech expert. He’s just pretending he doesn’t control the AI market. Of course he wants it to be stopped. If he still owns OpenAI, he would speak absolutely for AI research.
He seems to be dispensed with the Tesla Autopiloten development, and his laughable Tesla robot, but also have to be shut down.
Jennavhdem as “wide” the Tesla KI’s are it was only the speech of KI’s who are >=GPT 4 and even GPT 3.5 it was credible would have about 175 parameters. Doesn’t give many AIs that can prove this.
175 parameters? Please? That’s absolutely nix, that’s just 175 inputs xD I’m blowing up with a simple picture input
IT is not AI! There is no right to stupidity!
Okay? Who is talking about IT = AI?
upps!
AI, without technology?
You know that there is no right to stupidity?
To simply stamp all robots as “IT” is well thought.completely short. ALL technical is IT
Quote: “Autopilot development, and his laughable Tesla robot (=IT) but also have to be shut down(=KI)”
Sry da Fehr the billion behind it 😅, i.e. 175 billion