Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
31 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mauritan
1 year ago

Then I don’t understand your question.

What do you care about the opinion of third parties if you found something that works?

The technical analysis is a wide country. She needs to work if you use it correctly. However, most teach them in a way that is not different from chance.

So the question is, “Does medicines come?” – The answer to this is a “thing depends.”

Mauritan
1 year ago
Reply to  TraderJoe455

The subject is too wide for it and people know too little. All books are written, which from a statistical point of view are only bullshit. But apparently the readers buy it without thinking about it.

Try, for example, a head-shoulder formation systematically for 2 years with coming (!!) to recognize courses correctly. Ex post can everyone and there is then no “aw, was just a correction in the continuing trend”.

The mass worships the superstition. To remain with medicine again: for example, with Bach blossoms, which even exist in the pharmacy. You can’t discuss it much. The statistics say no, the people say yes.

And just as little as anyone could mix effective medicine themselves, those who either deny the chart technique or use “ineffective” what works.

Unfortunately, a discussion about it is fruitless. You can’t discuss how to play violin. You have to learn, many years. From someone who can do it himself. Unfortunately, this is extremely difficult to find someone like that. Because it is knowledgeable TUN instead of teaching.

Fundamentales? The chart technique works because it evaluates the order position. Considering circumstances that make the ideas of the traders become a waste, the circumstances occur. About the attack on Ukraine made the chart technique become subsidiary, because the traders changed their opinion from one second to the other. However, this opinion “stand” in chart technology.

In other words, a fundamental event is always going on.

Rat2010
1 year ago

I think the only reason traders aren’t going to be full here is that there are forums for traders in a variety of disciplines and logically all traders are cheating there. So under their own. If a trader does something here, it’s actually just to mission. And do you think it’s good if anyone wants to mission you? You see, everyone else isn’t.

A missionary meeting cannibals should consider whether he should not mission elsewhere.

Why don’t you just do this and look for a nice forum on wallstreet online? You’re certainly wrong here.

Rat2010
1 year ago
Reply to  TraderJoe455

It’s not exactly that I’m gonna stalke you here.

With mission I mean that you write about trade like others about their God. If someone comes with an argument (experience, for example), you will quickly and unobtrusively do it in faith.
Now understand?

Rat2010
1 year ago

Keep your faith.

Rat2010
1 year ago

Well, unsettling in faith.

Of course, people have experience. Own and by others you get to know as traders. Others wouldn’t answer you.

I also knew many traders before they – must have been so 2000 to 2003 – became my customers. There is the saying “Sometimes you swim with the market, sometimes the market is swimming against you.”

Jaycee73227
1 year ago

you can make of course am alllerding the opinion that you will only be rich in a broad portfolio in the long term

Jaycee73227
1 year ago
Reply to  TraderJoe455

okay you do the main job

christl10
1 year ago

He is 18 without training and without qualifications. He tries his luck in Daytrading and makes himself important here!

Jaycee73227
1 year ago

you are hedgefonds manager

mompf03231
1 year ago

Even the analysts employed at the Wallstreet are right in less than 50% of cases. So less than buying and selling after pure luck. I do not think so much of it. For good investments, you have to know the industry and the company. Then you can also take Rallies like Nvidia, I had this on the plan a year before, completely without any technical analysis.

mompf03231
1 year ago
Reply to  TraderJoe455

Overall their accuracy rate was only 47%, less than you might expect from random chance.

Anotherstudycalculated a dataset consisting of 6.627 forecasts made by 68 forecasters. It found that while some forecasters did “very well,” the “majority perform at levels not significant different than chance. ”

Over 20 years from 2002-2021, another report (discussedhere) found the average difference between target price estimates from stock market “experts” at the beginning of the year and actual prices of the index for the same year was a staggering 8.3%.

The Terrible Track Record of Wall Street Forecasts (danerwealth.com)

Short-term trade is speculation and derives from most technical analyses. There’s mainly money made with insider ringing.

binschonda100
1 year ago

Do you know high speed trading? with computer and AI…?

NA then stinks, good luck

binschonda100
1 year ago
Reply to  TraderJoe455

I don’t think so. I know what’s done on the market and what equipment and teams. That’s all. And you know everything, so you asked. Next ff 🧠

Jaycee73227
1 year ago
Reply to  binschonda100

Thinking with AI analysis can also be hitting the market in the long term

binschonda100
1 year ago

many countries elsewhere, intensive care needs