Warum wurden wir nicht aufgeklärt, dass PCR-Tests nicht genau sind und viele falsche Ergebnisse erzeugen können?
- Coronaviren sind jedes Jahr verantwortlich für 1/3 aller Erkältungserkrankungen https://www.dpz.eu/de/infothek/wissen/coronaviren.html (Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Leibniz Institut für Primatenforschung.)
- Die Reproduktionszyklen (CT – Cycle Treshhold) sind nicht von Labor zu Labor oder Test zu Test exakt gleich und können somit keinen unmittelbar vergleichbaren Messwert darstellen, der das Ergebnis immer exakt bestimmt. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Vorl_Testung_nCoV.html
- Auch noch längere Zeit nach Inaktivität des Virus kann ein PCR-Test positiv ausfallen, da kurzkettige Virusfragmente, die die gesuchte Genseuqenz noch vollständig enthalten, noch vorhanden sein können. https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/120745/SARS-CoV-2-Infektiositaet-laesst-auch-in-positiven-Abstrichen-fruehzeitig-nach (Ärzteblatt – mit Verweis auf New England Journal of Medicine)
- Selbst in Deutschland allein sind PCR-Tests und Laborbedingngen schon unterschiedlich, so dass es keinen einheitlichen Standard und somit kein einheitliches (vergleichbares) Ergebnis gibt. https://www.charite.de/en/clinical_center/themes_hospital/main_topic_coronavirus/faqs_on_sars_cov_2/
- Je nach Infektionskrankheit benötigt es eine gewisse Viruslast (Menge an Viren), um möglicherweise einen Krankheitswert (= Symptome, oder bei Infektionskrankheiten eine Infektiösiät) zu haben. Der PCR Test kann nicht messen ob man “krank” ist. https://flexikon.doccheck.com/de/Krankheitswert https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viruslast
- Bei einigen PCR-Tests steht wahrheitsgemäß im Beipackzettel, dass durch einen PCR-Test allein keine Diagnose gestellt werden kann, sondern zur Unterstützung einer Differentialdiagnose dient. https://clinical.r-biopharm.com/de/produkte/ridagene-sars-cov-2/
- Die allgemeine medizinische Definition von Infektionskrankheit (Viren sind in den Körper eingedrungen und vermehren sich – aktuell) unterscheidet sich von der Definition des Infektionsschutzgesetztes !!! Nach dem Infektionsschutzgesetz muss eine Infektiösität NICHT zweifelsfrei nachgewiesen werden um Jemanden als neu infiziert zu zählen !!! Da bei einer Pandemie solch genaue Differenzierung zu aufwändig und kostspielig wäre, und auch zu lange dauern würde. Da es um den Schutz von Menschen geht, ist die Definiton hier also nicht so streng, wie ansonsten in der Medizin üblich wenn keine Pandemie ausgerufen wurde und das Infektionsschutzgestz nicht greift. Was man also mit z.B. Infizierten und Neuinfizierten genau meint, ist während einer ausgerufenen Pandemie nicht die streng wissenschaftlich erwiesene Infektion – sondern auch nur ein Verdacht!
Fazit:
- Ein PCR-Test kann NICHT nachweisen, ob man an Corona wirklich erkrankt ist.
- Ein PCR-Test kann im Idealfall nur nachweisen, dass man (ein paar) Corona Viren in sich hat(te).
- Die Begriffe “Neuinfizierte” und “Infizierte” die in den Medien benutzt werden, bedeuten während einer pandemischen Lage NICHT, dass die Zahlen korrekt sind und tatsächlich so viele Menschen wirklich infiziert oder erkrankt sind. Es genügt NUR der Verdacht, dass sie es sein könnten.
Selbstverständlich kann und sollte man aber Zweifel an dem Ausruf einer pandemischen Lage haben. Besonders in einer Demokratie muss man wachsam sein, da es u.a. weitgehende autoritäre Massnahmen und Eingriffe in die Freiheit erlaubt.
(3 votes)
Loading...
I’ve called this as a conspiracy theorist from the beginning…but the subject is not over yet.
The inventor and Nobel Prize winner of the PCR Kary Mullis had always said that a PCR test is made only for chemical and not for biological detection. Furthermore, it cannot prove a virus, but only fragments and a PCR cannot distinguish between corona and flu—>was also the flu during corona virtually extinct–>the flu was corona.
What you also need to know is that the SARS-Cov-2 has a specific ORF1 gene and an E gene that owns any kind of coronavirus is exciting that from April 2020 every test was positive, whether ORF1 gene or E gene…so we could not say whether it was an ordinary coronavirus or SARS-Cov-2.
Here is the text of an Augsburg laboratory from an internet archive, because this text has been deleted:
Changed result layout of the SARS-CoV2 PCR results from now on, we only output the result posiƟv or negaƟv on our findings. To date, you have received two results depending on the test used. If the sample has been analyzed by Roche, we have reported the measurement results for both target sequences of the PCR (ORF1 and E gene) separately. The ORF1 gene is specific for SARS-CoV-2, while the E gene also occurs in other coronaviruses. The cases in which only the ORF gene was amplified have already been evaluated posiƟv. Few cases with isolated posiƟvem E gene were considered to be questionable and therefore repeatedly led to questions and problems regarding further management of affected patients. Taking into account the epidemiological situaƟon and the overall dense posiƟvenrate, we are now following the WHO Recommendation and will give a result as “posiƟv” when only the E gene has been amplified. In order to simplify the findings, only a total result (posiƟv or negaƟv) appears. A result is posiƟv if at least one of the two target sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the scrap material. If the sample has been analyzed by methods of rBiopharm or TibMolbiol, we have previously carried out separate screening and screening tests. Analogously to the procedure described above, due to the high posiƟven prediction value, with increasing COVID-19 prevalence, we limit ourselves to the previous screening test aimed at the E gene. 03.04.2020
LG
I have never heard of the ORF1 and E gene – this is really very interesting. Thank you
I also read that from the inventor of the PCR test, he even says it in one or two video interviews extra.
yes that was strange at the time…I had read this at the time on their homepage and made some media houses aware of it by e-mail…because this fact with the genes has shown me from the beginning that something cannot vote…there were no reports in the media and funnyly the next day this entry was deleted on the homepage…it was from the beginning a scam with the aim of making the mRNA treatments saloonable…and that was with the genes worldwide…
It’s one of your countless false claims again. Of course, the PCR tests could disassemble corona and flu viruses.
Why do you always spread so easily transparent false information?
I’m afraid you didn’t understand the lab’s paragraph quoted here.
what did I not understand?
Oh, you have to understand what you write? Unfortunately, no one has betrayed the user. Now he’s already trying to prove his absentee claims and it’s not right again. Such a conspiracy theorist has a hard time here.
This is lied, or with intention unprecise. PCRs showing influenza viruses are found on influenza viruses and not on corona viruses. PCRs which show coronaviruses show coronaviruses and no influenza viruses. That they do not distinguish is clear, but they only show that they are designed for.
I would leave the hobby away and through:
“Secretary – recruited by intelligence, psychologically trained and paid” replace.
Many people who are constantly vehement and with psychological manipulation techniques defending the mainstream state policy are not normal average citizens, but are recruited in secret societies (only for this they are really there!). They act in secret networks and act together against critics.
This is the reality, as in the GDR with the Stasi IM’s.
As long as people do not understand who or what their counterpart is, they have no chance of ever persuading their political views and fundamentally improving society.
Without these secret helpers, who are particularly striking and constantly denying, twisting and mobbing, the citizens would have chosen the politicians who do not serve them in no time.
However, because they encounter so much resistance and so many people seem to agree with politics, they give up their own opinion. This has been done for hundreds to thousands of years. The trick is that one thinks it has to do with loud ordinary individual citizens, instead they all work secretly together for the state and are trained for their decomposition tasks.
some users could be almost a hobby gatekeeper… 😉
Yes, you believe the proven liars and defend their fake arguments. 👀☝️
Yes. It says that there has always been “simply and unexpectedly” and nothing has to do with any intention to reduce the overpopulation.
You threw two more terms. They’re not arguments.
And she also says that this is statistically irrelevant.
I don’t deny it. I wrote on top:
It was counted wrong, but it was statistically irrelevant.
Because that’s what YEAR Source says: It was counted wrong, but it was statistically irrelevant. Why do you raise the first statement DEINER Source, while you ignore the second?
Believe without sound knowledge what you want and just let yourself be sewn.
continue to deny facts…you can seem good
On the one hand, it doesn’t say anything, on the other hand, I had made more arguments. You can believe what you want.
The source says that is counted incorrectly like many other sources. The reason for this is irrelevant because it is not verifiable or proveable. The wrong number is a fact that you constantly deny.
But you believe that people will deliberately spread lies in the news for fear and panic. As a vehement fact-leader, you fit perfectly with the liars. 😁
If you believe liars, that’s your problem.
Oh, yes, ” Suddenly and unexpectedly.” There has always been this, and the number of sudden heart death has been falling for years. And would not improve the “balance” of population reduction.
No, claimed the source you link. She seems credible for you, otherwise you wouldn’t have linked her. Why do you ignore this statement in the from you linked source?
Possibly in addition to some Sudden-Deaths (simply and unexpectedly deceased) probably long-term effect of RNA, sterilization effects (lowering birth rate)
Claim those who deliberately spread lies and propaganda about the media and have made critics dead and have published important facts about statistics only hidden ☝️
The VT sources where I found this text do not make exactly this difference. There are also beautiful colorful rings to see so that everyone can see how evil “gens” are. How many coronaviruses in D (not Sars-Cov2) do you know where a test on the E-gen would be positive? That can change. Lord let brains rain.
Yeah, you already wrote. You’re welcome to have that opinion, but it’s bullshit.
How’s that supposed to work? With a disease that demands a little 7 million deaths, this is less than 1 promille of the world’s population. So it really cannot be.
This is statistically irrelevant. Even if it doesn’t fit you into the stuff and you prefer to leave the statement unnoticed.
these are 2 different aspects…the one are false-positive results and the other is that consciously only the E-gene is to be tested for WHO rates…
I’ve been looking a little bit about the news about this Augsburg laboratory. In this text, which you have posted twice here, the answer to the question is certainly not hidden, why there were some false positive results in this laboratory. This certainly has other reasons and these are most likely in the known sources of error in this method.
We don’t need to turn around 100x, do we?
In my opinion, according to the evidence, it was a fake couple to inoculate people – and to earn or counteract the overpopulation.
There are countless evidence that PCR tests work and only hit Corona viruses.
Your theory or belief is huge.
in the human body anyway.
Then why not attack all people, but only those infected with SARS CoV2?
also contain sequences in other viruses
You are looking for sequences that only occur in SARS CoV 2. No other known virus has these structures. If it is a previously unknown virus, this is obviously so rare that it is not known. And then statistically irrelevant.
Well, you quickly corrected yourself. Cold diseases are not just the flu.
You’re like flu with cold diseases. Obviously you’re the one who has no idea.
It’s in exactly the same article you’re showing for your testimony. Is your source credible or not?
I’m sorry, you just don’t understand what you’re reading. I’m not your explanation.
You can’t know if the very short DNA sequences (breaks of 1/100 of the entire sequence) in the databases for which is searched are really unique – this is only claimed.
Very few have isolated Sars-Cov viruses at all – and not even after the strict scientific procedure: Kochsches Postulat.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henle-Koch-Postulate
Just after modified (simplified) procedures.
These few determine what the gene sequence is – all the others only take it from the database.
But even if you have them, it doesn’t mean that they are 100% sure unique. They could also occur, for example, in the DNA of other cells that are not yet known.
With a little over 1000 PCRs+sequencing reactions within a few years, still handmade, I already know what I’m talking about.
This is sad truth, unfortunately, you have no idea what you’re writing.
That’s not proof. This is theory (=belief). See above.
Coronaviruses are responsible for 1/3 of all cold diseases every year https://www.dpz.eu/en/infothek/wissen/coronaviren.html (Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Leibniz Institut für Primatenforschung.)
You see, you really have no idea about the subject, but talk and talk… 😁
Because there is only one theory (=believe) that it is statistically irrelevant, there is no proof.
“There is no evidence for this, on the one hand, the PCR tests are very inaccurate from home, with “insulated” searched gene sequences being wrong and also containing sequences that occur in other viruses or anyway in the human body. It’s possible to discover it only in 50 or 100 years.”
This is, unfortunately, a self-inflated bull without any knowledge of genetics and molecular biological methods. The whole text is embarrassing, by the way. It’s just as bad for the children who are supposed to have a lack of understanding of the text and for the “coronis” represented here.
Of course there is. The PCR tests only apply to SARS CoV 2. You really have no idea about the subject at all.
https://www.mdr.de/know/faktencheck-corona-pcr-tests-100.html
Influenza viruses are responsible for the flu. Corona and Influenza viruses are completely different virus groups. You have no idea about this topic.
It was counted wrong, but it was statistically irrelevant. Why didn’t you quote that restriction?
There is no evidence for this, on the one hand, the PCR tests are very inaccurate from home, and “insulated” gene sequences sought can be incorrect and also include sequences that occur in other viruses or anyway in the human body. It’s possible to discover it only in 50 or 100 years.
Corona viruses are also responsible for 1/3 of all influenza cases every year.
Because that wasn’t your question, you wanted to prove that it was wrong – you didn’t ask “why”. Of course, I think this “why” is wrong.
Why do you deny and deny everything as professional as a trained secret company? 😉
I think one has created a fake pandemic to inoculate people and thus either make profit or counteract the overpopulation.
Is there any evidence that the figures are in some way correct? No.
Is there any evidence that was counted wrong? Yep.
☝️☀️😎
The censuses do not vote, the tests are not accurate (you can measure what you want), media propaganda (intentional lies) on the panic issue, oral tortoise and denunciation of critics, censorship, important information on data collection and statistics hide so well that even “experts” do not find and know them, false censuses (statistics), etc.
They call fascism.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, FREE MOVEMENT. So he knew what the power pyramid is, how the secret symbolism works and that there is a secret dictatorship in which people are enslaved.
Warren Buffet (Multibillionaire) https://de.wikiquote.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett
What do you want with flu? The Corona test starts with Corona, not with flu.
You just jumped out, didn’t answer. Why aren’t you honest and write that it didn’t past you into your little world and you didn’t quote it?
Or 7 million influenza and vaccination – and in between a few with Corona if you want to call it that. There is no evidence of the above theory.
I have already answered that, please learn to read carefully.
Your mainstream theory is bullshit. Because she’s full of contradictions and mistakes.
Mine is better: Fake pandemic to inoculate people to benefit from it or to counteract the overpopulation.
There were 7 million Corona deaths worldwide and several hundred million infected. To deny this and then to talk about “something more than a normal flu wave” is completely absurd.
Yeah, that’s in your article. But also that this is not statistically relevant. Why didn’t you quote this place?
Yo, you can think. It’s bullshit.
Yeah, because there’s no safe evidence. There were certainly various seriously ill people, maybe a little more and more sick than a normal flu wave.
But this does not automatically mean that it is a dangerous pandemic.
What has been proven is that it has been counted incorrectly, that the media have deliberately presented false pictures (slogned), critics have been made wounded.
Panikmache:
https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/aus-innenministerium-wie-sag-ichs-den-leuten-internes-papier-empfiehlt-den-deutsche-angst-zu-making_id_11851227.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342438331_Die_Verengung_der_Welt_Zur_medialen_Construction_Germany_unter_SARS-CoV-2_and_Covid-19_anhand_der_Formate_ARD_Extra_and_ZDF_Special
https://taz.de/ reporting-ueber-Covid-19/!5710078/
Influential scientists:
https://www.merkur.de/politik/corona-angela-merkel-soeder-deutschland-leopoldina-lockdown-kuba-syndrom-news-90204364.html
Critics were dismissed or transferred:
https://www.merkur.de/bayern/corona-bayern-soeder-kritik-puerner-friedrich-gesundheitsamt-strategie-traf-maske-zr-13922061.html
https://www.merkur.de/bayern/corona-bayern
Proof that people who didn’t die of Corona were counted.
In my opinion, according to the evidence, it was a fake couple to inoculate people – and to earn or counteract the overpopulation.
Do you have 100% safe evidence against this theory?
Oh wow, now you’re denying that there was a pandemic. You have the full program.
For example, if test is false negative or if no test has been made.
You obviously have no idea how a PCR test works. Congratulations, you’re embarrassing yourself with every comment.
This is in the article you link. Why do you link something that contradicts your opinion?
Wrong. That’s just when you believe that the tests work well enough or that there was actually a Corona pandemic. There can be anyone claiming to search for any short-chain gene sequences from a huge chain that may exist 😉 only in the Corona virus. There are very few scientists who know each other in depth and know what is being sought. All others have only the ONline version of a gene database that is supposed to contain the sequences of corona viruses. The vast majority can only consider whether this is true or not. Is there the searched chains possibly also in other genes, from other viruses or other which is in the human body or can reach into it.
It is always done as if all this is simple and clear science – but it is not at all. It is highly complex and susceptible to errors. If, moreover, few decide to deceive the rest, they can do so. There are little isolated Sars Cov Corona Viruen around the world – that’s why the problem starts. Therefore, the gene sequences originate.
In addition, this isolation is not what one actually understands biologically (there are clear rules) – it was isolated only by mitigated rules.
Why didn’t they take this in the ARD Tagesschau and informed the population? Even all the self-proclaimed “experts” here on GutFrage have denied or denied this – while at the same time they have made endless vaccine propaganda – how harmless the syringe is supposed to be and how well everything would be tested.
In other words, this vaccination propaganda here has been made mostly by completely incompetent persons who have spent themselves as biologists or other experts. It is obvious that many paid lobbyists or secret helpers (from secret societies that freemasons?) have been involved professionally.
As it is still likely today. This professional and intentional dismantling is too noticeable. I think it would only be in secret action if people were to be manipulated to take a vaccination.
This is what people who may have created a fake pandemic to benefit from it or reduce the population. I don’t believe such people.
Of course.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, FREIMAURER. So he knew what the power pyramid is, how the secret symbolism works and that there is a secret dictatorship in which people are enslaved.
Warren Buffet (Multibillionaire) https://de.wikiquote.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett
These are just theories.
No. Both the overcrowding and the under-creation are facts.
No, because the error rate of the test was extremely low.
How would you have proven something from 2023 with an article from 2021? In addition, I have already explained to you that the “with” or “an” question only plays a role in your circles, otherwise not because there was also a not inconsiderable understatement.
This is again an article from 2020, i.e. the beginning of the pandemic. And – why don’t you cite completely from the article? It says:
That’s true. However, the situation described is very rare, so that the number of deaths is not distorted.
So: Statistically completely irrelevant. Again, you link an article that is quite the opposite of what you say. Are you reading what you’re linking? Or are you just pulling out what seems to fit you in the stuff?
You’re really on something big, go on! That also applies to the rest of your disgusting statements.
The user has no other view, but explains what it has with your alleged sensation – nothing.
But that’s not right, I had proved that until at least 2023 was counted incorrectly (dead with and died), I bet today is so.
That’s not true, there were also casualties, murder victims, self-defenses, etc.
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2020/04/23/coronavirus-ja-auch-infected-die-violent-be-in-die-statistics-recorded/
You don’t know who buys the goods at the supermarket. In vaccination you know exactly who comes and who you give the injection – this is the difference.
It is the only possibility that there are currently worldweti to secretly authenticate or execut people in large numbers – if you want.
Every secret service that has been sent to a pharam company (infiltrating is the main task of every secret service), which has personal data (secret service has access to all personal data of the citizens) can theoretically transport a poisoned ampoule directly to the target person – without anyone else noticeing it.
If I can imagine this today as a layman – then it is 100% sure that secret services (and/or military) have known for decades (and possibly plan).
No, you obviously only run behind the power elite and run professional dementation and disintegration (propaganda techniques).
The ruling power elites and their secret helpers (like the IM’s in the Stasi decomposition) of the secret societies thank you for your loyal support. 😁
You have collected 100 points and can redeem them against vouchers from Amazon or Google Play.
(Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Freimaurer – he knew what the power pyramid is and how the secret symbolism works)
(1984)
Warren Buffet (Multibillionaire) https://de.wikiquote.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett
These are just theories. Similarly, one could say there was a huge overstatement because the tests provide false results.
A scientific consensus (= belief) is not proof.
so that you can read again… another user has a different view, that’s legitimate…you know what’s inside?
let me know…but please with books written in front of the test pandemic, because there is everywhere that C viruses are basically harmless cold viruses…beautifully that you managed to google the Dunning-Kruger effect…
Oje, here unfortunately someone massively under the Dunning-Kruger effect
no it is not…a coronavirus is basically a harmless virus…you know…for your educational gap I can’t and your story is really cute
Sorry, the comment is slipped.
This is basically wrong. A friend of mine has visited a bat cave on Cuba and has become very ill. Probably an unidentified coronavirus. He was very sick for a long time. A pandemic has not become of it because it was apparently not so easy to transfer from human to human. I know Mexican biologists who, when they catch bats for examination, have been wearing mouthguards long before “Corona”. Whoever talks the risk here is no longer to help.
Why do you post the same thing you wrote in your answer again as a comment? Since you have already been explained that the alleged sensation is not at all?
And what you have not yet explained: Why do you spread the wrong information, PCR test could not distinguish between Corona and Influenza?
Here is the text of an Augsburg laboratory from an internet archive, because this text has been deleted:
Changed result layout of the SARS-CoV2 PCR results from now on, we only output the result posiƟv or negaƟv on our findings. To date, you have received two results depending on the test used. If the sample has been analyzed by Roche, we have reported the measurement results for both target sequences of the PCR (ORF1 and E gene) separately. The ORF1 gene is specific for SARS-CoV-2, while the E gene also occurs in other coronaviruses. The cases in which only the ORF gene was amplified have already been evaluated posiƟv. Few cases with isolated posiƟvem E gene were considered to be questionable and therefore repeatedly led to questions and problems regarding further management of affected patients. Taking into account the epidemiological situaƟon and the overall dense posiƟvenrate, we are now following the WHO Recommendation and will give a result as “posiƟv” when only the E gene has been amplified. In order to simplify the findings, only a total result (posiƟv or negaƟv) appears. A result is posiƟv if at least one of the two target sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the scrap material. If the sample has been analyzed by methods of rBiopharm or TibMolbiol, we have previously carried out separate screening and screening tests. Analogously to the procedure described above, due to the high posiƟven prediction value, with increasing COVID-19 prevalence, we limit ourselves to the previous screening test aimed at the E gene. 03.04.2020
I hope you can read this sensual…
No, just SARS CoV2. And that was anything but troubleless.
The scope is so small that this question only plays a role in circles of conspiracy believers.
The question does not have to be “on or with” but “the one who died earlier because he was infected”. If the answer is yes, it is a Corona death.
Moreover, the link shows that there was also a massive understatement – deceased who were not tested at all. This is likely to be at least statistically equal, if it does not even lead to a higher sub-arrangement.
you don’t understand the scope of on and with etc…this is exactly the same with the tests (ORF1 gene)…that had all the consequences for the people…Leave Basic Law…Working insolvent etc.
Just what I had written: At the beginning yes, later no more. And at no time, for example, accident victims with a positive test were counted as corona victims. As described in the article, it is about people with basic diseases, which are also additionally affected by corona.
And secondly, patients with basic diseases infected with COVID-19 who cannot be clearly shown what was ultimately the cause of death (“dead with”).
Here the question arises whether they have lived shorter because they have infected themselves with corona. If this is the case, Corona is the cause of death.
Why? You’ve established that vaccines have batch numbers. There are many other products. So why do you think it is possible to produce a single vaccine specifically and deliver it, but not other things? Inconsistent.
Sure, you’re obviously running behind every regular table parole and conspiracy count.
should I be like this, even though I see it differently… but what did that say in the reverse? that every insane C virus was counted as a deadly virus and treated so…just forget that due to precisely these numbers the basic law was expelled and the people were grazed…Companies broke etc…
You don’t seem to know the difference between corona and flu viruses. This actually says everything.The other text does not fit the first sentences at all. If a virus changes quickly, it can be advantageous to detect two different sequences from a virus from one and the same sample. There are probably very specific primers and somewhat less specific primers used here. Because the Corona virus was mainly in circulation in the population, it seems that there is no double evidence. In addition, the text states that there were problems if only the E gene was not detected by the ORF gene. There are two possibilities here, either the patients had another corona virus or the patients had “Corona” but with mutated ORF gene. The effort to break these two cases has not been made.
let the hobby gatekeepers…they aren’t worth giving them valuable life…you can spit facts into the face and they still don’t see it
So you admit that you have no evidence on the subject and only suspect it.