Warum wollen Autohersteller mehr Geld für Teile haben als die Nachbaufirmen?

For this, you have to define what you mean as a post-construction company. Often it is the suppliers who also supply the parts to the factory. Their prices with margins of 40 -80 thousand parts per year are therefore crucial and important for the supplier’s cost coverage.

Amazing quality is the magic word. Clearly the manufacturer requires more than he has on the one hand the total logistics with transport costs to carry the storage and shipping costs to the end consumer or wholesale / intermediate dealers such as car house etc., which is hit on the parts and the storage costs of the car house plus x = the merit that everyone wants.

In addition, much more often enough, the development work has been done and he wants to earn something. Furthermore, it also guarantees the quality of the product, which many of the post-productions of China would also have to do theoretically, but often do not do enough.

Try to claim a China product from the net. Then even the rice bag that fell. the attempt alone can at best radiotone at an intermediary but rarely enough.

If you were desolate what the vehicle manufacturer would really pay for the respective part of the supplier, you would probably turn through I can say from the sewing box that it is about 500 % and easy even once 2500 % and more are what the manufacturer is often enough on it. a vehicle seat which is bought for example for something around the 135 Euro by the manufacturer costs quickly 2500 to 3500 Euros as a spare part.

In this way, the millions are generated by e.g. the development of products whose trials up to series maturity and the operational strength checks, which are partly determined by the legislator, are costing.

These costs often do not or at least do not cost a subcontractor for the post-construction projects and can therefore also offer them cheaper, with the still a considerable profit bonus.