Why are people who prioritize their work-life balance often viewed as lazy or unambitious?

Your statement “Even Guilty” shows how bad you are. In the past, workers had to meet most rights and improvements in working conditions. And only because the coming generation benefits from the lack of skilled workers, there is no reason to be so declining, especially since the younger generation has much less on the box than the previous generations. To do this, you can consult any personnel of a larger company. There, larger scales are made for the requirements year after year. And that is contrary to higher demands. If you put yourself in the position of a company, it might make you realize why the discussion about WLB is not just positive. I guess you weren’t born and raised in a working-class family right now. Maybe you can see the extent better if you need to work with WLB colleagues.

You asked. I’ve tried to give you an indication of why this isn’t positively understood at all. That’s all. It was from my side. Another beautiful Easter Sunday!

When the labour market was still producing enough labour, in some sectors it was decided to grant only the minimum, i.e. 20 days. It was usually 24 days before.