Why are no residential buildings being built on Tempelhofer Feld?
(2 votes)
Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Sights in Freiburg: which ones? Where?
BySabahwe
Hi guys, does anyone know if there are any sights in Freiburg and if so, which ones and where?
Spraying graffiti on the Brandenburg Gate?
ByPukpuk13
What would happen if you did that, or is it guaranteed? would it even be possible?
Were the driving license classes in Austria and Switzerland the same as they are today?
ByKoio78
Germany used to have numbers on driver's licenses. Today, they have letters. What were the classes like in Austria and Switzerland?
Where does the name Freudenstadt come from?
ByZEIT66
In Baden-Württemberg? Is everyone happy there, or why is the place called that?
Where do young people in Vienna go on the weekend?
ByChartLP
I was recently in Vienna for a few days, and I noticed that I hardly saw any young people between 17 and 20 on the streets on weekend evenings. In the bars I passed, there were mostly people 25 and older.
Because there should be a recreation area. After the Tiergarten, the Tempelhofer Feld should become the second green lung of Berlin.
There have never been houses here and it has never been planned to build them here, but around them. On the grounds itself, however, a central library should be created, which was rejected by referendum.
The Bibliothel should be in the halls
In 2014, there was a civic decision in which the majority of the Berliners voted for the preservation of the Tempelhofer Feld as a free space.
Give the whole again about 150 to 200 years then it is probably fully built. Future vision 🔮🔮🔮
I wonder. They had Tempelhof, Schönefeld, Tegel as airports, then came BER with breakdowns.
This Tempelhofer Airport is a Nazi building with high columns, red color on the walls, round-ring Nazi architecture. Grottenhäslich, the old letters ‘Centralflufhafen’ had been preserved for a long time. The whole building is powerful. The airfield, however, is a huge green area in the middle of Tempelhof, perhaps you wanted to leave it as many people like to skate there. But probably there was no money.
How was that again? ‘Berlin is poor, but sexy’?
Ouch.
The potent toilet is protected by monument
Because in the urban development plan, which is probably defined as a recreation area and is not released as a living area
Probably because of nature there. Or a situation for jobs. Or coincidence. Bad real estate prospects. Etc.
Love
I’ve heard the terrain is quite contaminated. If you were to build houses, you would have to remove the floor completely.
Berlin is only worth living with the green lungs. The large parks were rescued in West Berlin because of the island years by the construction of the 60s and 70s.
Today, one should have reason and keep the area free from urban climatic considerations. With the CDU-Senat, of course, short-term profit becomes more important – as usual.
Because you want to get it as a free space. The city also needs parks, venues and the like.
The most ugly open space in Germany
Good question… Because Berlin is so left-extreme-LGBTQ-Ökopunks besieged. Even the Soviets were better.