Warum sollte man als synchronsprecher ein zweiten Job haben?

Ich sehe das überall das leute sagen man sollte als synchronsprecher einen anderen neben job haben. Aber warum ist das so? Kann man davon nicht leben

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Schauspieler691
1 year ago

This is like many freelance artists. Since they are not constantly talking, they earn their money as a lecturer and in other professions

DerHans
1 year ago

I’m sure you’re a regular speaker. They hang from one engagement to the next.

This also applies to BEKANNTE actors. They are often unemployed between their commitment

LePetitGateau
1 year ago

One is rarely fixed somewhere, but is only booked “as needed”. If you are acquainted, you are regularly suggested for roles, if you are a little light you can be happy if you get a small speech every few months (you will also be paid after effort). Is a very unreliable income, if you do not belong to the “Top Elite”, you need a second leg

frodobeutlin100
1 year ago

If you’re in demand for any screen stars, you probably don’t need that.

all others need this from occasional small orders, you can live badly

most synchronous speakers are also actors and have a second leg

frannpol
1 year ago

Is not a safe, constant and sufficient income. Unless you’re in the exquisite circle of superstars in the industry.