Sugar is also a drug.
AND IF ANYONE WANT TO COMMENT THAT PEOPLE NEED SUGAR THAT IS WRONG BECAUSE THE BODY PRODUCES THIS SUGAR ITSELF!
(3 votes)
Loading...Brands for Chocolate chips gummy bears Cheese substitute Meat slices-Erschatz Poultry, chicken, beef substitutes etc which one can you recommend I'm not concerned about the prices, I'm concerned about where you say: Yes, the brand has (as far as we know) no dirt on its hands, the products taste good
Hello folks, I'm increasingly deciding not to eat anything at all. I've been having health problems for about two months. The worst part, in my opinion, is the difficulty swallowing. Everything in my throat cramps up, and it slows down the flow to my stomach. What's left is pressure in my chest and stabbing pains…
I saw a very…radical woman on TikTok who advocates for veganism. Of course, the way she expresses her opinion is debatable, but what she says isn't wrong. The only arguments against veganism would ultimately be convenience and enjoyment. But is this really so much more important than a life? Are 5 minutes of good taste…
Hello Sarahhappy810, 👋
because cigarettes always harmful
and sweets are not always harmful.
This may be the case for some people,
but for me sugar is not a “drug”.
Sugar also often saves me (at
a hypoglycemia) life! 🥳
Right:
All carbohydrates (except fiber) will be
in the intestine transformed into glucose = grape sugar.
Sugar is also not essential.
Nevertheless, it is okay and not
unhealthy when you get from & to times
what tasty sweethearts. I eat well.
something sweet, such as dark chocolate and
that is not harmful, but even healthy.
smoking cigarettes, however, is always very
harmful… in very small quantities.
So alone would be
bad pictures on packaging of all
Sweets mM completely inappropriate.
♪
LG 🙋🏻
~~ Daily calculation of all carbohydrates ~~
Nevertheless, sugar is considered a drug, even if you don’t see that, it’s just scientific fact that you can’t discuss away, in the rest I give you quite
Don’t worry about sugar. And a scientific fact hasn’t been three times.
Thanks for your feedback.
I just said that this can be so for some, but “for me sugar is not a drug.” I do not want to say that sugar per se is not a drug. LG 🙋🏻
LOL… 😂😂😹🤣🤣💦💦💦
And dextrose, by the way, is just another word for sugar.
So… and otherwise necessary You don’t have sugar or how?
Dextrose in a hypo
is logically excluded!
No, you can’t live without sugar. You should know that as a diabetics.
Bullshit! Sugar is not an important
Nutrients, as sugar is not essential.
Without sugar you can live very well.
No, because sugar is an important nutrient and the regular supply of vital nutrients is a necessity for you. Eating and drinking is therefore the opposite of drug addiction.
(The quote comes from your previously shared link)
The question of why people eat more than they eat was the subject of investigations. And sugar seems to play a special role in this. However, this is not surprising because sugar is also an important nutrient without which you cannot live.
According to the studies, however, tasty food with little sugar can also activate the reward system in our brain similar to drugs.
You can write this nonsense again and again, but it doesn’t make it more true. And again it’s about sugar, not “food and drink” in general.
https://www.wisemed.ch/blog/zucker-eine-harte-droge
No, because a need is something different than a addiction. Eating and drinking gives the body vital nutrients that it needs daily. This is the opposite of drug addiction.
Sugar is a drug and there are studies that I have linked if you don’t want to accept it, it’s just your thing, from me you can eat the drug sugar until the attack, your thing. Good evening
https://www.wisemed.ch/blog/zucker-eine-harte-droge
Then read the report you have linked to yourself before, in which you can read that according to studies, tasty food can activate the reward system in our brain similar to drugs. These are not studies that prove that sugar is a drug.
NOT TO READ! ZUCKER is a DROGE, point eats what you want, but this is a fact
Sugar can have a positive effect on brain metabolism, similar to good food and similar to the consumption of drugs. No one denies this. But again, it does not mean that good food would be a drug. Quite simply because eating and drinking is a necessity for man.
But that is what you say, you have to read the whole report and not only confirm the small part of the one.
Extract from one of the links
This is a quote from your links.
That’s not true, read the links, please. This is about sugar as a drug, nice evening. Unfortunately I can’t give you a right because you don’t have one
Then just read what’s inside the links you had shared here before! It is explicitly referred to by tasty food and not explicitly of sugar.
You confuse things here. It is not about good food in general, it is about sugar that acts like a drug and is therefore also classified as such.
This is a very bad search, just read what’s inside in your links!
Delicious food can in principle be everything. So good, hearty food with little sugar can be very tasty and activate the reward system of your brain, just like drugs do.
Only that does not automatically mean that good food would be a drug. Quite simply because eating and drinking is a necessity for man. Without food and drink, you’d come in after a few weeks.
https://www.lifefood.de/de_en/blog-die-droge-sugar-and-his-effects-on-our-koerper
https://www.zentrum-der-gesundheit.de/bibliothek/sucht/zuckersucht/as-droge
https://www.drugcom.de/newsuebersicht/top themes/suechtig-nachzucker/
pssst, first inform, then write
I would like to get the metabolic path explained…
Simply put differently, man needs the sugar so necessary that he could even make it himself, over a detour. However, since such a detour means more energy and effort, it is easier to supply sufficient sugar via food.
All that goes beyond what the body does not necessarily need is too much. Unfortunately, in some cases more sugar is eaten than the human being needs. That’s why every reasonable person would advise you to less sugar today. Only without sugar, it’s not possible.
Because no one has ever committed themselves to it; or have not yet used enough people to provide candy with warnings.
I’m just thinking in my head cinema what this could look like. A photo of a fat 200 kg person on the table of chocolate, with the saying: “If you eat too much of it, you will soon look like the person on the picture.” 😅
Or what do you have?
Diabetes Tyb 2,Adipositas,heart diseases,caries,lever diseases,Metabolic syndrome,inflammations,health problems,stimulation problems,sugar addiction,sleaf disorders,tease problems,Fetlebs,problems with insulin levels,deterioration of nutrient absorption,high blood pressure,risk on certain cancer species,health imbalances
Oh. Sarah, I don’t trust to eat chocolate anymore : )
Where should that end? Then also “shock images” on fatty products, alcohol-containing products, pointed objects etc.
Honestly, I don’t think about the pictures on the cigarettes. Smokers smoke anyway, there are also chic cases that you just pull over the box.
One should be able to assume that the adult ordained people, know what they think physically and take the risk voluntarily, and for that everyone has the right to smoke, eat dead or drink into the tomb.
Sounds very hard, but this is also meant by freedom.
I think so. JEDER knows anyway that certain consumables – whether cigarettes, alcohol, candy etc – are not exactly healthy.
As if these pictures would scare off some smokeable people. Those who want to do it anyway.
The aim is to inform consumers about smoking and to hammer them into health risks, including lung cancer, heart disease and lung disease. It’s a bit different in sugar.
What do you want to take with candy for scary photos?
Photos of Adipous people or caries teeth?
Apart from this, the warnings of long-term smokers do not stop smoking.
No one will not buy candy because of a warning.And as long as one does not totally exaggerate, there is nothing to do with responsible consumption, unlike cigarettes
😊, haha, with the adipous photos I have also just thought 😂😂😂.
Yeah, you don’t even have to smoke cigarettes. To be compensated for by inconsiderate qualifiers at bus stops, i.e. passive smoking, is also damaging…
Because cigarettes are much more harmful than candy.
Greetings
😳 What❓
Ups have prescribed me 😅
Because cigarettes are something different than food.
You can also drink to death with water. Doesn’t mean we need scaring pictures.
As far as I know more and more people don’t have water because they don’t taste
It doesn’t matter what drink – each contains water, and by drinking too much you can get water poisoning. So also by literal cola e.g.
In sugar (as in water) the dose is also decisive, while any cigarette or even passive smoking is harmful. That’s the difference you want to explain here.
In the case of large quantities of sugar that are partly hidden in foods, so do not have to be called “sugar”, it is naturally really difficult among the recommended max. 25g/day to stay.
But there are now also more and more calorie-free soft drinks and syrups, of which one definitely won’t get too thick.
(How healthy they are sometimes there.)
What’s that supposed to be?
These are probably the same people who at McDonalds then add a diet to their 3x menus.
Sugar is not a drug. Cigarettes already. In addition, the body does not produce sugar itself
Sorry had only two hours of sleep and I am sick and had already had a very exhausting discussion at school today and have no nerves anymore
👆 this is your problem! Then don’t ask if you don’t have a bell on demand
Sugar is not a drug. And safe in a reasonable amount. There is no harmless amount in cigarettes.
Apart from this, it is being done that people are fed healthier or better regulated.
Oh, don’t. With me, candy is a kind of drug.
If I had the cutlery to do this, I would spray the stuff 😁