Why do you vegans have to name your products after meat products?
That's misleading. Instead of vegan schnitzel, it could also be called chemically modified soybean pulp.
(6 votes)
Loading...
(6 votes)Loading...
(6 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Can I cook bagged rice for longer?
ByColemak
The bag is full and I've cooked it on a higher heat. What if it's not cooked properly? Will it take longer? Or is something else happening?
Why do I look fat?
Hi, I wanted to ask why I look so fat. I weigh 44-45 kilos, am 1.56 and 11 years old and look like a fatso😞
Can I put ready-made glass noodle sauce on spaetzle?
“Mirácoli Pasta Sauce Garlic” to be exact.
My skin? Is it getting too big? I want to gain weight. I'm 62 years old.
I want to gain weight after illness, but I have no appetite
Because the name influences the taste for vegans. Even though they claim that this would taste just as good as they did not try the original for years, in a direct comparison, a normal consumer then notices great differences between imitation and original. That’s why many vegan animal products talk badly by calling them different.
Thanks for the star!
erm, someone probably didn’t understand veganism
Because it’s just about the dosage form. Sausage does not mean “smell waste/meat pressed into intestinal”. And what else would it not be? And so everyone knows what to use it for. With misleading it has absolutely nothing to do with. Because everyone who is powerful in reading will be able to read the vegan immediately. Except of course he’s too stupid to read or understand what’s up.
And what should chemistry be changed? Do you know how much chemistry is in the animal products? Do you even know how much chemistry is in you as a human being? All in the world consists of chemical compositions. Does the argumentation mean that all vegans are made of chemistry rather because it is exactly the same in animal stuff and even in humans. even the air you breathe consists of a chemical compound. The water you drink, by the way.
By the way, there are also enough substitute products that do not consist of soya. For example, I buy from time to time and here myself is very much eaten by the absolute meats and felt very tasty.
I think you should see these “imitations” much more critical than it is currently being done.
You very much like to have a lot of food “lost” because you do not use it directly for people.
The same principle can be applied to all “imitations”.
Why there is it is simply explained:
The stuff is bought, and such a name now has a certain advertising effect.
happy if there is an alternative free from unnecessary violence
I don’t care.
I just wanted to point out that vegan diet is not a cure.
Why would the cattle hide?
On the subject of pig and poultry :
It is true, strictly speaking, these species are food competitors to us.
However, there are a few factors that make it more sensible to feed cereals to animals than to process food directly.
There would be the absolutely low cereal price. As a result, it is more profitable to feed the grain to the animal than to eat it.
Another major role is the purchasing behaviour of consumers. Because everyone wants to have only the best product (with the difference in 99% of the cases being only the optics), producers are forced to set increasingly strict quality criteria, so that even more cereals do not get an acceptable price, and only land in the feed trough.
At the bottom, it can be said that meat consumption will only be reduced if producers prefer to bring their grain to the mill than to the feed plant.
It will always be there that animals are fed, as there are many factors that will completely exclude them as bread grains, but there would be potential to influence this.
That’s not right. only ruminant animals are to consume in the position gras in the quantity as nutrient supplier. let’s say we’re blinding the cattle, though you’re absolutely wrong. how to justify the killing of the black netc. whose food could simply eat the human
That’s the point:
You don’t want to live with grass. However, as the world’s agricultural areas are mostly only grassland (more or less karg), it is essential to use animals as a food source.
I didn’t. I don’t think.
So again, how do you justify unnecessary violence?
Question: Have you ever eaten a handful of grass?
If so, how did it taste?
If no: Why not?
so veganism does not understand. How can you care about unnecessary animal suffering?!
Because it is an alternative to a certain food. Should I resemble most of them, from taste or appearance.
I think that’s because sojapampe says no one knows what’s meant
Just as if corpse pamp would stand on instead of sausage
That’s right
Because it’s supposed to imitate them. If I make a vegan cheese alternative, I call the naturally vegan cheese.
Why call non-Vegan animal cadaver sausage and not just parts of bodies?
Galley
good question, vegan products are also parts of vegetable pellets.
but the plants annoyed
immediately
I wish you the more vegan
If you could want something….
from when do you wish that no more animals are slaughtered, and all the world (humanity) is vegan?
then don’t run on the cowboy. I can’t stop living because there might be an accident. the logic we would have to slaughter all car drivers
“In addition, the animal no longer suffers, and does not eat the whole soy away (because now you secretly)”
yes, animals eat more soy than men, and through warmth they even lose the large part of energy and kill someone so that he does not suffer must be strongly utilitarian defended.
is doof for the climate. but you are also extremely co2 negative. I still don’t kill you.
Okay. because of me, that animal is pure evil and totally dangerous. then let him wait for his dead and never raise a new one again. just because it’s potentially dangerous, it doesn’t justify the violence and quarrel for your low.
unfortunately most European milk cows are not on grazing
triviale reasons….
if you walk out of town with a little dog through the cow’s pasture, you would make me responsible if the bull went on you or your dog
also the animal is no longer suffering, and does not eat the whole soy away (because now you secretly)
Or should he continue to live for 20 years and eject climate-gone, eat food, and only water consumption…
And the animal quality on the meadow can’t be left with a potentially dangerous animal, so there’s only a stable where you’d be sure to put something out.
At Dominion, the dairy cows were on the pasture. It is good that you see the European dairy cow.
unfortunately, dominion shows the start of the west.
so didbdu kill the bullen only from trivial grums
Because these animals become harmless from a certain age. Besides, they eat a lot, and hardly take weight.
Usually they are slaughtered at 18 months, but that did not work on time.
As in DOMINION, Germany is not allowed.
Okay, rare take. but why did the bulle have to be killed anyway?
Exactly. only for trivial reasons
That’s good.
My cows live with their calves, and the last cops I killed when he was 2 years and 1 week old. (This is over 24 months.)
But not for Döner.
good enough to know that the calf does not want to be demolished by his mother to end in 5 months as döner
“…but I’m sure no use…”
Do you even know farm animals personally?
Me too. but certainly not “used”
will you have killed happy biohumans?
Have you ever seen a happy animal?
I do.
Yes, but they could never get angry. animals. no animal is voluntary in this industry
And if the plant parts were brutally ground or chopped, they can no longer annoy themselves.
if it was brutally murdered before, it may not be possible….
The animal doesn’t get angry when you eat the meat.
Question to omnivore person who apparently triggers this so that she has to ask a question about it… Possibly, because a certain product is being reproached?
Apart from that: For various meat-containing products you could also find very disgusting names.
If I agree, please call the “Steak” to “dead meat from pig with extreme amount of antibiotic”
A steak should be from the cow, you can’t know
There are also pig steaks
Wow, you’re so special:D
It sounds more familiar.
Then Nuggets should also be called meat residues of lower quality in shape pressed with panade.
Or Bratwurst small pig pressed in poloch of other animals
Les ich often hier das anyone who wants to put ws in the poloch
It doesn’t bother you with this name.
whether soybean carvings, vegan carvings or otherwise what is actually Wumpe. The difference is clearly defined. And no one gets something “under-jubilized”
Sure is a vegan carving not a carving. But meat eaters also distinguish between Schitzel. And and and. And if everything is called soyopampe, you could no longer distinguish it. Doesn’t that play the big part, since everything is unreal? Perhaps, but sublimely taste the various after-heared products. Or am I wrong, vegan?
Nobody gets vegan because he doesn’t taste meat anymore. Therefore it is good to find healthy alternatives that provide the products without unnecessary violence. there are many products that taste different. it is not everywhere soy in
It’s supposed to go after the original meat dish, just without animal suffering.
vegan chicken nuggets taste like real chicken nuggets, so they are called vegan chicken nuggets. I’ve always wondered why so many meat eaters are disturbing
But where is the chicken?
It’s not there.
Boy it is supposed to follow it and it SCHMECKT as, how can you not check it 💀
A sincere man of the vegans would not eat anything like that. That’s just for unconvinced and maybe so that a pair of normal ones can try that too. So winmax
Huh?
Even if these products are often unhealthy, you can’t care if another vegan enjoys their products. unnecessary animal suffering is so odder set. that has no longer to do with veganism
So you can get excited about it 🙂
I am outraged
Remember
Recognition value should be the main reason
Could also be artificially flavored meat pamp.
So what’s that senseless discussion?
Heul quiet