Why can house-elves Apparate/Disapparate to and from Hogwarts?
Hello, one question:
Why can house-elves Apparate/Disapparate to and from Hogwarts?
Hello, one question:
Why can house-elves Apparate/Disapparate to and from Hogwarts?
https://www.moviepilot.de/news/avengers-5-release-cast-story-mehr-alle-infos-zu-the-kang-dynasty-im-mcu-1137832
I've seen a lot of them and am looking for ones that you don't necessarily have on your radar.
For me it's Wolverine
I'm looking for a film that I haven't watched in a long time. It must be a science fiction film about a virus pathogen. I think it's about a fungal infection that was found underground and is infecting the environment and people. At some point in the film, a doctor or researcher is sent down…
and its creator when you watch the film Frankenstein (from 1931)? What emotions do you feel for Dr. Frankenstein and his creation? And what do you think of the film and Boris Karloff's role? (Feel free to compare it to the book)
The protective spells are designed for people. Elfenmagie, however, works differently from that of people.
Thank you!
If your Lord or her mistress allow it, they can do everything except affect life
Housewives have a particularly strong magic. In addition, they must be able to appeal everywhere, otherwise they cannot fulfill their task.
Because it’s the most powerful beings in magic…
He was good.
There is no counter proof.
Well.
Yeah.
That you’re 12. You didn’t want to change it. You wouldn’t have, after months after I finally completed the discussion, had to go to the bag.
I’m sorry, Doctor Professor, I don’t understand the deeper meaning of your conscientious cons. Please have the goodness not to bother me.
Sorry but I’m 12
Go to your own mother!
HDF
Jesus fucking Christ, what do you want from me?
You
Of course you can be right about Fantasy. Why the hell do you have to go to my sack after four months after this meaningless discussion was finally over? What’s the point?
Because harry is a powerful fantasy, and you can’t have a right at fantasy
Why would I be right?
But you can just keep your mouth shut, right?
I can’t believe this argument is stupid and is often used.
Always your “always this stupid argument”
I don’t have to be able to criticize it. Again and again this stupid “argument”…
Right.
Yes, but they are only the most powerful if they allow their Lord*in
Why don’t you accept that you can’t do better and without J.K.Rowling don’t ask this question
Could you be better??????
According to your argument, you would have to throw all brooms into the fire, block all magic animal beings and stop running because you can apparise. You can choose a variety of things after pleasure and mood.
The books aren’t perfect. It’s not a drama. To make a Schimpftirade on the author, I find silly. No man is perfect and you can make mistakes and forget what.
They are powerful because they don’t need a rod, but everything that magicians can and even more. They just don’t use it to enrich themselves.
Again this stupid argument. Yeah, it’s her world. And yes, she can do what she wants. That doesn’t make the logic holes shit less. And no, just because I critise something, I don’t have to do it better.
Is her world, she can do what she wants…just invent something herself…
Yes, the old man is the world she likes. Changes a little after all because it feels so smart. But their history is full of logic holes, which is due to (as you notice very easily) that it has gradually developed the world of HP from book to book. For example, it makes absolutely no sense why Dumbledore, who can appeal, flies to London in the first part. It takes hours. Appearing, she obviously only thought out in later parts. And with all the magic stuff that even adult wizards would not have been able to know about in the course of the books, Dumbledore and the teachers take the ones who can overwhelm even first-hand blowers to hide the stone of the wise. Sounds logical. If he had just used a Fidelius spell, no one could have found the stone before his death. But Rowling only invented it later because it was so good for her. In summary, the author is bad and should have created the world like Tolkien and then construct their history.
Once the author mentioned…
A lack of evidence is not proof.