Why isn't Cum Ex simply a scam?
Good morning!
Why does Cum Ex have to be discussed forever, whether it is legal or not?
Doesn't that just count as fraud and that's it?
Thanks!
(1 votes)
Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Why is there no obligation to have private pension provision?
Why doesn't the government pass a law requiring every employee to take out a private pension plan? Everyone would have to submit proof of contract to the Ministry of Labor and a bank statement every six months proving active savings—at least €50 per month or 3% of gross salary. Such a law would prevent poverty…
Customs fees from DHL?
ByNicki371
Hello, I recently received a message from an unknown number (see photo). I did indeed order something, but the order was for some information from the Bundesbank, so it was completely free. Since I find it strange that you would receive such a message via SMS, I wanted to check it out. When you click…
Would you ask the seller already?
I bought something from France on eBay over the weekend. It cost 185 € and it was debited from my account at midnight on Monday, so he already has the money. The seller wrote on Sunday that he would deliver the package on Monday or Tuesday. Yesterday I received the shipping confirmation with the tracking…
Fraud classifieds account name "Han"?
ByAwa20
I was scammed on classified ads by a user named "Han." He sent me a fake ID and wanted to sell me a used exhaust system. If anyone else has been affected, please let me know.
Why are trading posts located on coasts?
Question is above, thanks in advance!
If I bought fake shoes, does the seller cover the costs of the inspection?
I ordered some shoes from a secondhand platform and I'm not sure if they're genuine. I'd like to have them checked, but it costs €5. If they turn out to be fake, I can request a refund via PayPal. This fee, plus the money for the shoes, is refunded.
Well, what is not forbidden is first ‘authorized’ and one has found a gap in the system that some have exploited ice cold. That it must be obviously immoral and simply ‘false’, she did not stop. That’s what they call ‘scrupulous’.
It could have been left to the authorities or politicians. There is a blatant gap in the tax system and several companies are trying to get rid of the state a few billions!
No, it’s probably a crime.
But what had to be decided in a highly judicial way!
Do not change my statement
It is a crime, says the BGH, vulgo tax evasion and aid.
It does not fulfill the deeds.
That’s a good question. Actually, it should be clear to everyone, and tax advisors and banks only right that you can get a tax refund only 1 times if the tax has only been charged 1 times.
However, if it was indeed a legal gap due to a sloppyly formulated law, then the question is why the policy has looked at the drive for years. The damage to the taxpayer goes into the billions.
It is not legal, “the inventor” Hanno Berger was sentenced to 8 years in December.