Similar Posts
Does tin have a bad standing among the population?
In toothpaste advertisements, they deliberately use the English name instead of tin(II) fluoride. Tin is great, right?
Question about reaction enthalpy/heat energy?
It is said that the energy difference in a reaction in an expanding vessel is the volume work + the heat energy, so the heat energy is the total energy difference – volume work, so ∆H = ∆Up*∆V But the formula is actually ∆H = ∆U+p*∆V How come?
If pure barium and chromate compounds are so toxic, why is BaCrO4 not acutely toxic?
Why is the combination of these dangerous compounds less toxic than barium or chromate compounds, which are bound with much less dangerous metals?
Why was 16 "O2" given as 16 moles in the exercise?
In the image section, you can see 16 O2 in the equation. However, in the calculation, this is referred to as 16 moles. I thought it was 32 moles, because it's O2 and not just O. Or is it 16 moles, but with twice the weight per mole? Why was this done here? Is there…
Why is the reaction equation correct?
The formed hydroxide ions further react through a neutralization reaction with the hydronium ion (H3O^+) from the acetic acid, which is formed by the reaction of acetic acid with water, and are converted back to water. H3O+ + 2 OH- –> <– 2H2O how does this happen?
Moin,
this is because a permanent dipole depends on two conditions: on the one hand, polar atomic bonds must be present (this is the case with both molecules), but on the other hand, the molecular geometry must also fit (and this is only the case with the water, but not with the carbon dioxide molecule).
What is meant by molecular geometry? – Well, both molecules are three atoms. But the water molecule has an angled geometry while the carbon dioxide molecule is linearly constructed.
Water is an angled molecule.
Carbon dioxide is linear.
If you now imagine both molecules as small balls, then water has a pole that has a positive partial charge (there are the positive hydrogen atoms), and a pole that is negatively partially charged (there is the oxygen atom). ball, two poles with opposite partial charges = dipole.
In the case of the carbon dioxide molecule, however, the ball would have two negatively partially charged poles (outside the negative oxygen atoms) while in the center (on the “equator”) there is the positive carbon. ball, but two equally partially charged poles, NO Dipol…
Conclusion:
The first requirement for a dipole molecule is therefore polar atomic bonds.
If these are present, the molecular geometry must then also be suitable.
All right?
LG from the Waterkant
The water molecule is angled and therefore has a positive hydrogen side and a negative oxygen side due to the different electronegativity of hydrogen and oxygen. It’s a dipole.
In the case of carbon dioxide, the electronegativity of carbon and oxygen is also different, but the molecule is symmetrical (linear), so that the electronegativity difference is equalized. It’s not a dipole.
https://studyflix.de/chemie/dipol-2390
Because the dipole vectors stand up in CO2 (as in CH4, SF6…).
Water, on the other hand, is pseudo-tetraedric.
Nevertheless, CO2 is an IR-active greenhouse gas, since asymmetric vibrations change the dipole as a function of time.
Because CO2 is a straight molecule, the charge shifts between C and O are cancelled.
H2O forms an angle, here the charge displacements do not lift up. Therefore, a dipole is produced with negative charge at the O.