Wenn mal Flugzeug abstürzen sollte, geht im Dach installierter Fallschirm automatisch auf. So kann das Flugzeug langsam und sicher eine sanfte Bauchlandung machen.
(3 votes)
Loading...Hallo zusammen,neulich bei meinem Flug ist mir folgendes aufgefallen. An der Parkposition sagte der Herr Captain wie immer “Parking Position”. Darauf sagte eine Stewardess in etwa sowas: “Cabin-Crew on ______ – Cross Check” -> Doch was ist die Cabin-Crew dort? Viele grüße,Jodelpupo
Hello.. on my plane ticket it says: Mr. Meiers Ferdinand… so my last name comes first and then my first name.. When the travel agent asked, I said my last name first… Could there be any problems?
I'm flying from Hamburg to Helsinki on Friday, September 20, 2024. The flight departs at 8:20 a.m. and I'm flying with Slot a Fly. I have two pieces of checked baggage. The flight departs from Terminal 1. How long in advance do you think I should be at the airport? I've never flown alone before,…
Pilots have to use a flight simulator and it's in real time, but how does it feel when you crash, for example if the simulator has errors?
Hello, since I'm flying soon on a Germanwings Airbus A319, I wanted to ask where the best view of the wings is. I've already done some research. There are 17, 18, 19, and 20 seats that fit the pattern behind the wing. Which one would be best?
Which German airlines pay well and accept people over 2 meters tall? Thx
It is theoretically possible. Only it is very expensive brings weight with it. In addition, most accidents aren’t that a plane just falls out of a height where you could still use the parachutes.
Such a nonsense. Theoretically nothing is possible. A plane travels at up to 900 km/h, and if only a mini parachute is thrown out, it tears off and that was it. Physics skills would always be advantageous.
Thanks for the correction!
The problem is that there are no sufficiently solid materials that would be able to let a 200-tone traffic jet slide gently on the parachute to the ground.
This is why there are only up to the size of four-seaters:
Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS) In Action – YouTube
Powerless plane makes parachute landing – YouTube
The real problem is somewhere else.
In most accidents involving passengers, such a parachute would not be useful, for example
There is simply no sensible application for it, even if it were technically possible.
Fun fact: an Airbus A380 has a sliding number of approx. 1:20, i.e., if all engines are out at 10,000 meters height, it theoretically still comes 200 km far in the pure sailing flight.
That’s bullshit. Most of the accidents occur at start and landing, and they are called flight accident and not “crash”. And, in addition, such considerations are meaningless as they are, one can simply googlen. You just have to enter “passage plane parachute” and immediately recognize the nonsense.
A plane is too slow or too heavy. Theoretically, this would be feasible, but there would have to be huge parachutes onboard.
Think how big a parachute has to be for a person alone. For a plane, that would be gigantic. And would contribute a lot of weight, which means 1) The flight would be more expensive and 2) would generally be less effective.
Because that’s not an option. You have to land the plane without a crash and not blow people out and let them sail to the ground on parachutes.
Aha a crash is better for you than a bubble landing?
No, we prefer reasoning than meaningless imagination. When it comes to air transport, you should ask: “Ah, things are like them, and that will have its good reason, so what reasons can there be that things are like them?” Leads more to the goal than to amaze and imagine and to think out completely absurd nonsense.
A falshad would just tear when you turn a falshad. In addition, it would not help with most accidents, for example to fly against mountain.
No, it can’t fly with screen.
It’ll fall.
Because the screen would be too big.
Well, but you can just do that up there’s nothing
It’s not possible, kid.
Why do you think the fighters have shields for the seats and not for the whole plane?
One of these costs 100-200 million euros, which would like to save them if they were.
But it’s not possible, which is why only the seats have umbrellas.
Everything was calculated it is only the question of the will
Do you know how big the umbrella would be and what the weight would be?
Besides, he wouldn’t always use it.
It’s rare that the plane is stretching in the air and falling down like a stone.
You can’t open a screen when the 800km/h is fast.
if you were to fit into all the seats of an airplane, this would be about 20(!) weigh more tons. Moreover, it is too expensive and it would take about 2 minutes until all seats were thrown out of the aircraft. And you’d have to unfold the roof, which would be a thing of impossibility.
I’m sorry, but why don’t you do it in passenger planes?
DO NOT READ?
Yeah, the pilot stays in the seat and the whole seat has a screen.
The seat is blown off, with pilots, and it is tightly seated and there is the screen.
In the plane the seats have parachutes?🤔 I didn’t even know
Yes and I have a primary school degree, but then school was even more demanding.
Today you get a master when you can write your name.
How impressively you are.
I studied quantum technology and ohysics
For a couple of ultralight flyers there is this really
Irrtum! Not only for a few ultralight aircraft, but for all ultralight aircraft.
I knew out of my head now only two or three models that have it. But my stand is a few years old. Thank you for the hint
Such rescue systems are mandatory for all ultra-light air sports equipment. By the way, soche systems now also exist for small aircraft
I have no aeroplane accident with scorching machines of recent years, in which a giant parachute would have prevented the misfortune, ArunKong.
it would be more sensible to shoot people out with a false sense, but nobody does, don’t ask me why.
One of the main reasons is that it is not lucrative economically.
You save a lot of money. Considering that the situation only happens with (no idea how the odds are just one example) 1/5000 flights, but if you have a parachute for each of the 5000 flights, you pay extremely much money for kerosene/head, which is simply not necessary.
(Aside from the other reasons)
The question why it is in airplanes, especially when they fly over long distances over water, life jackets, but there are no parachutes is quite simple.
EIn parachute jump is for the passenger, it is untrained simply too dangerous. The risk of going on is virtually barely lower than the risk of falling off the spoon.
There are two other problems. at the speeds that such a machine flies in order to remain in the air at all, a safe jump is no longer possible.
Once the aircraft is at an altitude where the athmosphere is tight enough to be able to breathe without a mask, it may also be time-consuming to get all passengers out in time even in a small plane as we say to an A320.
So you could just as well ask why there are no centrifugal seats in coaches.
Lg, Anna
Even if you could shoot the passengers at the height of the trip funny with slingshot seats in the area, they wouldn’t survive.
it is going nuts, even if there is only one of 250 passengers who survived, it would have been worth it and there is a solution for everything, we are today in a very technically advanced age, probably it is just about to get their money out of something like this
No, it doesn’t have to (and it’s not possible, as guaranteed accident-free car or bicycle ride is not possible).
You’d like to, but that’s something else. Good news for you: you can easily reduce your personal crash risk to zero by not getting a plane. It’s also good for the environment.
All other air passengers can live with the negligible risk.
Quite simply for the reason that this question can always be asked here at GF.
Gähn, that’s exactly what I was thinking. Bingo.