Warum hat man ein geringeres Risiko für Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen, wenn man seinen Konsum an Fleisch, Fisch, Milchprodukten und Eiern, reduziert, insbesondere an rotem Fleisch, und stattdessen mehr auf Obst, Gemüse, Hülsenfrüchte und Vollkornbrot setzt?
(3 votes)
Loading...Ich brauche heute nur das Eigelb und will das Eiweiß nicht weg schmeißen. Was kann ich daraus machen ?
Was fällt Dir am leichtesten?
Hii Ich esse ganz normal nicht unbedingt gesund aber auch nicht ausschließlich ungesund irgendwie ist mir vor einiger Zeit aufgefallen dass ich tatsächlich überhaupt nicht zunehme sondern eher abnehme obwohl ich so gut wie kein Sport mache und für mein Alter (m/17) schon fast mehr als normal esse aber egal was und wie viel ich…
Ich backe gerade mit meinem Bruder ein Kirsch Kuchen und er hat nur ein Ei im Kühlschrank und beim Rezept steht 2 Eier… endert das was bei der Struktur? Halt google sagt mir verschiedenes …und es ist schade wen der kuchen nichts wird 😂
Rührei hähnchenbrust Pilze mit öl Braten
What do you think?
There is no real evidence. There are only epidemiological data that could indicate that inferior, highly processed meat is suspected to favour cancer.
The disorders you mentioned never have only one cause. The whole lifestyle plays a role over many years, plus genetics/disposition. Most of them are the animal foods consumed there from low-quality mass livestock farming incl. Fast food, etc.
This could be due to the fact that herbal dietary habits are often associated with cheaper health effects. Vegetable foods usually contain less saturated fats and cholesterol, but more ballasts, vitamins and antioxidants that can have a positive effect on the cardiovascular system. Ballasts inhibit fat as well as carbohydrate absorption, which increases blood sugar more slowly and absorbs less cholesterol in the body. In the end, the amount of food consumed also plays a role, and a healthy lifestyle with regular physical activity and mental health contributes in addition to a holistic well-being. In any case, it is an extensive subject that still needs to be explored.
A big topic, maybe this will help you here:
https://www.aerzteblatt.de/messages/119045/Study with the consumption of red meat
https://www.mdr.de/knowledge/humaneveryday/beating-het-het-hes-risk-red-meat-100.html
In other animal foods it is not always so clear as the study situation is not always sufficient. For example, the consumption of dairy products (except kefir e.g.) is still a hot controversial issue. Only slowly is there a clearer picture of this and the researchers who are more likely to be on the pro-page for milk consumption are also in favour of moderate consumption.
I find a very interesting subject.
There is nothing really clear here, too. The 1st link is an epidemiological observation study. All 4!!! years the only male participants have completed a questionnaire. A real proof of this is of course never provided by a kind of data collection. Or do they know what they have eaten and drank in the last four years? How often did they consume alcohol, drugs, caffeine, nicotine? How often did they have stress and have slept too little?
This study is more likely to support the thesis with the overall unhealthy lifestyle that I mentioned earlier. The authors write in the study themselves that people took the more red and processed meat, drank more alcohol, more often smoking, have a higher proportion of diabetes, more often took painkillers and were less physically active. All participants in the health sector were also active. A large proportion of this will work partially or completely in the layer system. shiftwork has been valid for a long time. WHO on the factors that can promote cancer. This factor has also not been addressed here at all.
Therefore, causes and effects are diverse and not due to a particular food.
Also, the origin, quality and the degree of processing of foods, in particular meat, have not been asked, nor have I specifically distinguished.
Your objection is of course partially justified. In this area, you will be difficult to create an inaccessible study, probably you will never. And it is absolutely right of you to emphasize that meat quality and other living conditions play an important role in overall consideration.
However, the article also states that accompanying factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption could be excluded from the data. Finally, it is a rather large-scale cohort study.
In addition to the age and year of the survey, this included ethnicity, marital status and form of life, occupation, employment status, smoking status, physical activity, body mass index and calorie intake, alcohol consumption, use of multivitamins or aspirin, as well as the family anomalies to KHK or stroke.”
Therefore, I do not understand why you say that this study confirms the thesis of general (unhealthy) lifestyle. Finally, one knows these factors and tries to filter them out in the corresponding studies. Of course, there are still other possible causes for the increased number of patients in meat eaters that were not mentioned in the study. But then we’d be back in reliability.
In addition, there is the (relatively new) approach that leads to the demonstration at the molecular level. I don’t want to wipe it out completely. On the contrary, I will follow this closely over the next few years. But surely there is also a counter study or this will come soon.
—-
Basically, it becomes a question of faith when you doubt the reliability of studies. This is how convinced meat eaters doubt the correctness of the studies that contradict (high) meat consumption, which is absolutely right in my eyes. Everyone has the right to own opinion and you don’t have to believe everything that is published as a study.
That also applies to the other side. Studies that do not confirm or refute this can be questioned with similar arguments. And I hope it’s just fine for you that I’m on the other side.
Let’s see what the next ten years of research results. And then we’ll talk again. 😀
PS: I’m glad you’re in good health.
I wouldn’t confirm that.
But the too fat and too plentiful diet combined with lack of exercise is certainly not healthy
Find out about the different fats that exist.
Eggs are not harmful per se, which has been refuted by now.
Red meat contains anti-inflammatory substances.
Because the body is not so damaged, with digestion, pollutants, etc.
Who says that?
Usually processed products are meant. So cheap sausage and similar.
For example, I am meat and fish (good) and I am squeaky. Adern and so all bare and free.
Are you affected?