Why is there a fixed speed camera column on country roads with a speed limit of 100 km/h?
Who drives that fast on the country road?
Rather too slow, many don't even drive 100 but only around 80 on the speedometer.
In addition, the tolerances are even higher… I think I heard that a colleague always drove past it at 110 km/h without it going off.
There are many who like to drive faster according to the motto tolerance and at 10 over Kost yes Nix.
then lkw on land roads can only drive 60 here in Germany in the normal case and some lightningers can distinguish whether a car or lkw drives.
and if it is a blue column then it is a toll column and not a flasher
You probably don’t drive long or you’re driving the license. The prescribed 100 km/h on the highway have their permission. Sometimes one wonders about the boundary, but not every road is equally well developed. The 100 km/h is the same value for all roads.
Hazards are more often the 110 km/h of your colleague, because the deduction of tolerance is roughly included.
When a car is torched over the road at 80 km/h, it is more of a traffic obstacle and is usually overtaken at the wrong place. This is the result of a number of accidents which would really not be necessary.
When lightning columns are placed on the road, most of them are at the beginning of the road, when you get out of a place or at the end of the road before you enter a local area. That makes sense.
Good evening.
Often on land roads is flashed, but there are not as many lawns as elsewhere, but there are many who really drive 140 or faster on land roads.
Me. And I don’t think that’s positive that I’m proud of it or something, not at all. Just a statement.
Where do you come from? 80? So here I say the majority is faster than “just” 100 on the road.
Well, in my car, 110 tacho are about close 104 real speed. And at 104 only 100-101 remain after deduction of tolerance. So this is not surprising that at 110 tacho on a 100km/h route mostly ncihts happens.
Legally it is prescribed that the tacho must never show too little. Therefore, it cannot be. Rather different.
Of course, 110 was not 100. My (Tipp) error. Otherwise, the colleague’s quotation would not have made any sense for the “always 110” either.
Where is the legal requirement? This assertion is captive.
As a rule, there is a tolerance of + – 4-5 km/h in the old-style tachos. And this is also the tolerance range that is then pulled off.
With the new digital tachos the display should be correct. But these drivers also benefit from the tolerance rule.
More precisely, there are 3% tolerance from the speed that is driven and measured, which are deducted.
Ah!
You can find the rules I mean here in No. 5.3 sentence 1.
Very many.
Yes trucks. Of course there are always some veils, but they’re not the crowd.
Trucks don’t sneak when they stick to their speed limit. I don’t think that’s good.
I guess you’re only driving in a lot of traffic at daytime, right? There are enough young people who want to make it really crash at night, that I hear from our B56 every weekend when the wind is cheap. The police guys have full employment. Every weekend, several driving licences are cashed and cars shut down. From me, there could be every 100 meters of lightning.
Tacho 110 km/h is usually around 100 km/h in real.
The column could have been built there because the empty road becomes the race track at night.
Probably the road is so straight that many cars drive significantly faster than 100 km/h.
A lightning column, which does not detect traffic healthiers, causes only costs and is soon dismantled.
10% tolerance on the lightning columns can be counted, only I would not rely on it
Tacho 110 would be real 105 km/h.
Maybe the column was not sharpened when it was still a old
I can’t answer that. I just know there are flashers that are set to tolerance.
From 54, you could presume 1 km/h of excess. In many tests, however, the flashers did not trigger a predeterminable overshoot from 1 but only later …
If you assume a tolerance of 3 km/h, you will be flashed up from 53 km/h. That’s the normal case.
Where else are the trigger limits lower?
If you live in the city, that actually applies to you, but otherwise not.
na if you mean…you won’t be surprised when it gets expensive
The trigger threshold is 9 more
https://search.app?link=https%3A%2F%2Fbus money portal.de%2Fblog%2Fblitzer%2Fblitzer border-gesenkt-wo-read-ab-59-kmh-one-bus money-reduced%2F&utm_campaign=aga&utm_source=agsadlx2Csh%2
YouTube is definitely not a safe source…and is triggered more….
Eben, in unreliable places
Of course I have read several times that within 50 km/h it was only flashed at real 59 km/h so tacho 62. From reliable sources such as self-tests at Youtube or Zeitung.
So high the limit is definitely not…but a speedometer indicating 110 does not drive 110 u to the trigger limit…
Depends on how they are set
These new 360 degrees are more flashy. The trigger limit is probably higher than 9 or 13 km/h.
Honestly, why do you ask a question again, although there is a “most helpful answer”? This is completely underground!
For those who drive too slowly, the flashers are not meant. They also cause less fatal accidents.
Take off. It’s likely that you could comfortably drive 120kmh…
It would be possible on many land roads if you did not have an unnecessarily general speed limit. There are mass-wide country roads that only go straight kilometers, as 100 km/h are already relatively catchy.
Where are these? How many kilometers of land roads aren’t straight?
You’re holding a speed limit for demolition? What do you think?