Warum erfolgt neuerdings im Web immer die Vorgabe falscher Kenntnisse?
Langsam beginne ich ein wenig am Web zu zweifeln, liebe Freunde und das hat seinen guten Grund. Auch wenn ich mich dann bei anderen Fällen wieder irre. Aber:
Da laufen im Web derzeit laut allgemeine Spezialisten herum, diese Wortschöpfung ist absichtlich kreiert, denen man nur 5 Minuten zuhören muss. Und schon wird einem klar, dass diese Person es mit der Wahrheit nicht so genau nimmt.
Da bin ich zum Beispiel auf einen Spezialisten für Wirtschaft gestoßen der von den Fächern Betriebstechnik und Betriebswirtschaft noch nie etwas gehört hat. Einen KSV für eine Privatorganisation und daher für die Wirtschaft als unwesentlich erachtet.
Oder auch schon Theologen, die noch nie etwas von den Templern gehört haben.
Da bin ich auf Fachleute für Physik gestoßen, welche die Erde für eine Kugel anstatt einen Geoid hielten und meinten, dass es keine Jahreszeiten gebe. Denn sie würden sich in ihrem Fachgebiet auskennen und die Erdachse bewegt sich nicht.
usw.
Wen wundert es dann, dass dann meine Ausbildungen, die ich wirklich gemacht habe, immer angezweifelt werden. Wen man sich selbst als etwas ausgibt, was man zweifelsfrei nicht ist.
Wobei es mich dennoch wundert, dass diese Personen Allgemeinbegriffe wie HTL für Betriebstechnik noch nie gehört haben. Gibt es in Deutschland so etwas wie HTLs nicht. Oder hängt dies mit defekter KI zusammen?
Was glaubst Du?
I also think that this could be a problem, because false knowledge doesn’t want to believe. I think that the people who have learned nothing and are still active on the web are creating websites and inserting false or own information. In your examples, of course, I guess that’s what I think. Usually it should be checked by someone who wrote it.
You can check that. What I’m holding on my pages is partly what I learned at the Temple Academy. Expanded by own research. However, I would normally have a title not recognised in Austria. Mag.templ. However, when I wanted to introduce it, I was told that Templar studies are recognized in the USA, but not in Austria.
And I could also paint the Dipl.Prg. from the Siemens Nixdorf Academy. In this respect, I always do without titles. Even if I had taken this straight.
Oh, okay. Yes, however, these people just zip me in good German.
Peitl, of course you, with your X thought-out professions and titles you have to complain about others. And – as not to be expected otherwise – you make capital mistakes in your justification. Let’s take an example. You say that the KSV is not a private association (what else, state?). Well, then I recommend looking at their side, that is the credit protection association 1870, short form KSV 1870 (not just KSV). The association has over 33,000 members and under its roof there are several companies. For anyone who has only a minimum of understanding, it is clear that this is a private association and not a state. Accordingly, all statements of the association must also be evaluated. But of course, you promptly claim the opposite and think that others are stupid.
KSV: See Wikipedia
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreditschutzverband_von_1870
Quote: TheCredit protection association of 1870(KSV1870) is a state-president, economically and politically independentCredit protectionAssociation
A federally privileged organization. So you’re right, I’m making mistakes. My mistake is, for example, people who can’t even use a google, not just block it. But why:
People also have to have people over which they can just shake their head.
And please don’t be angry with me, but everyone who’s so halfway in mind and doesn’t know, usually uses Wikipedia.
The term “state-predicted” is impunity. For example, a non-profit entity is also prejudicially privileged because it does not have to pay taxes. In particular, what is the state’s prerogative should be read. The fact is, however, that this is a private association that has its own agenda and which for historical reasons have been given a few advantages by the state.
In total, KSV 1870 is not neutral, but a representation of interests.
I don’t think that the KSV 1870 has ever heard of you, and as you should have noticed easily, the proportion of rejection of your post is considerably greater than the consent, and the consent is more generic and has nothing to do with your personal situation.
No. They’re shaking my head now. That’s why I got the question on several occasions.
But not only do you have a mindset, but an individual opinion, because all others think your statements are completely nonsense, whereas I have not yet experienced anyone holding my statements as nonsense about these discussions.
The KSV 1870 does not act on the government’s mission, but it is a privster association/interest that looks back on a 150-year history, and that in the course of this history some advantages were granted by the state. This is something completely different. There’s something like this in Germany, which is sometimes found at foundations.
I don’t know what you mean by AMA.
No. Clearly declared. An organization on the government order. Like the AMA, by the way. Only the KSV is an association where AMA is a company.
The only thing I really see is your statements.
It is fascinating how in a question that suggests other ignorance, so many erroneous assertions can be contained.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erdfigur
But let’s keep looking:
2.Also that apparently there have been even greater shifts, the story of the dinosaurs tells us.
3.The modern templates can also be traced in closed form to the old order. I’ve proved several times.
4.The KSV is a state-predicted organization. So no private company.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreditschutzverband_von_1870
5.We have already noticed several times that you reject the Freemasons academies as a whole. This should be your temparament. They still exist.
And for my schooling as a whole:
It has been enough for me to have held a trade certificate for computer science and consulting for 10 years.
1) The first sentence to Geoid in your link is:
This makes it clear that the earth is not a geoid.
2) According to the current state of knowledge of science, the dinosaurs have died by a meteorite attack or have developed into birds.
3) These claim. It’s bullshit.
4) The KSV is state-adjusted, but still a private enterprise. But that we bear an authority, which is not. This is also regularly criticised by consumer protection. Link to the top.
5) These academies may exist. However, since they are not accredited by the state, they must not award official titles, but only fantasy titles that cannot be worn. And that regardless of my temperament (!).
You were very successful with your company but never. Because according to your information, they have gone broke and you have even become homeless through this plebis. This is not a very good proof of economic competence.
What does this have to do with the actual question?
The questioner suggests ignorance to those who answer his questions, and it is him who owns them.
Read what a title is. You don’t have a title, not one, and you don’t have a recognized certificate as a graduate programmer, because you don’t have it, never gave it. So don’t say bullshit.
Say, these are all inventions of you without any evidence.
I have enough to do with a newspaper, a blog, appearances in TikTok, Istagram, petitions and crowd funding.
By the way, I’m still doing the log networking work.
No. I’ll tell you that I’m working with my log on many pieces. Otherwise, I have almost enough work with the homeless party.
That’s the piece I’m personally responsible for.
Even with us, the day has only 24 hours. All right, we can take the night. That’s what it was.
You always tell me you’re supposed to take over the lines everywhere. If you look at the lines, you’re standing. Never name there. This makes you doubt your claims.
Then others report, ask yourself whether they may refer to you, put you in the or the function, etc. and it will continue working independently.
Why should there always be something about me? I don’t think you’re going to work like the FMs, do you?
This is not about realizing everything in isolation. It is pierced by someone a stone and as in the song falls into the water a stone draws wide circles.
There’s nothing about you.
The American branch even survived:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Business_Network
We in Austria were less lucky.
Then Su can probably link a newspaper section.
A lot of people have come along with it. Just you don’t. This should be due to the fact that you are simply loud but otherwise not really well connected.
A hand full of mobber, that was it.
Only that of this “megapleite” nobody got anything.
And your online format didn’t explode, because you still confuse readers with people who click on your pages as you spread your links everywhere.
You were accused yesterday by another user.
I really didn’t like it. When I broke up in 2001, the INVEKOS project was offered to me that I could also take over with a registration note in the laundry room of a UBM demolition house.
After that, I was stabilized so far that I could start a second career as a journalist, which I really never learned.
The approach of “former big entrepreneurs makes a homeless newspaper after shipwreck” was good. The online report has already exploded. And since then, all the media I attack. Even though I have never learned anything in this direction except preaching.
1. Now it’s getting tough. It’s not a pane. Don’t bullet. Now you don’t say Geoid either. What is she then?
On paragraphs 2 to 4, I do not want to be completely contradictory. Once again we have the theory in practice.
5.) That these academies are not accredited by the state is my big problem. Actually, I have two titles “Mag.templ.” and “DiplPrg.”, which exist on the testimonies, but are not acceptable and therefore not portable.
Internally, the FMs know I have this title. And the problem is:
I was successful. And that was my problem. I came up with the idea: if I have permanent utilisation, I also find it for others. Changed with the Global Business to the Großconsulter. It was also successful until Y2K. And then I’ve made a mistake:
I assumed that the Y2K will have a lot of orders and even expanded during the final phase of Y2K. The orders would have been there. Only nobody had a money to invest.
And since I was used to success, I didn’t want to do that. So I didn’t dismantle any employees. Until we all put it on the ceiling.
Was at that time a Mega Pleite as today SIGNA. The Benkö shouldn’t be too much.
The web is now able to pass on knowledge unabated by the end user, many can inform themselves about all the possible sources and there is unfortunately also much mist. The so-called split is indebted to the black-intelligence, each of which nowadays tries to persuade his thoughts will depend on this black-intelligence, be it with likes, comments or similar. So if the question is how good content gets more from the cake, the ki of the next generation is already waiting to tackle this problem
I’m sorry, I only know the problem too well.
I also have to do it more often with a user who, contrary to all the facts, claims that Ukraine had begun the current war with Russia and that Russia had only joined the war in 2022.
Then, the alleged states of Luhansk and Donetsk are fantastically ignoring that Russia has already annexed Crimea in 2014, which is equivalent to a declaration of war.
This is what happens when people want to sell their weakly researched opinions as facts.
You’re probably not just dealing with a user. This really belongs to the party line of several parties:
1. Sahra carnival
2.) List of Petrovic
3. MFG
. The Yellows
. Homeless in politics
Something like that shouldn’t upset you. Politicians sometimes see some more realistic.
Oh, yeah, you were there…
Realism has nothing to do with ignoring facts that do not fit you into the stuff.
By the way, you should take Sahra Wagenknecht out of the list. This defines the Russian war of attack as what it is: an aggression of Russia. She does not claim that the aggression went out from Ukraine.
But that’s another fact you’re going to ignore, isn’t it?
According to your logic, in 2022 it was also unwise to attack Ukraine via 4 routes. Well, it’s gone pretty wrong.
The attack on Hostomel went next, so no bridge head near Kiev could be established. The attack on Balarus was not only caused by it and the Russians had to withdraw from the north after a few weeks and confine themselves to the front in the south and east.
So it would be a failure to subdue Putin military wisdom. Your logical card house will collapse. You have to make better arguments than merely subjugate, it would have been unwise to act at the same time as Crimea in Luhansk and Donetsk. Especially since the Ukrainian resistance on the Crimean Peninsula was almost unavailable in 2014.
However, this is and remains doubtless West propaganda. Since Putin was currently active in Crimea, it would have been very unwise to act simultaneously in Luhansk and Donetsk.
That would have extended the troops to a far too wide area.
And another straw man argument. No one denies the war in Donbass. Most users agree, as are most experts, that Russia was already actor there.
The fact that you see it as a group that is of an opinion is more likely that you are the only one with your “decision”.
No. But it seems to be a group. It is noticeable that several people almost represent the same views. The fact that in terms of the war in Donbas by the bank, as if there had never been, must be apprehensible.
You? Are you talking to me in the plural?
You, I agree with you on some points.
At least you’ll see that.
You’re right. It should have been like this anyway:
Putin attacked the Crimea. This led Girkin to assume that Putin is now busy. And that should have given him the security:
Now I can call Luhansk and Donetsk to states.
That’s why Girkin’s proud announcement that it was him.
That’s a straw man argument, because I never claimed anything like that.
I’m referring to a Strawman argument. You could’ve figured that out of context.
Yes. Someone who’s advanced. Only Girkin is nobody. The classification of straw man is simply wrong.
I’m shocked… as a journalist you don’t know what a straw man is!?
Right. One of the very few who were already in conversation to become the successor of Putin. Girkin should have been the force behind it when Prigoschin marched on Moscow.
Luhansk and Donetsk were not randomly chosen. I agree. Putin’s busy in Crimea. Great. It’s a good time for me to take Luhansk and Donetsk.
What? Who is the great opponent of Putin? The straw man?
This is a vain request. Even if he now acknowledged your facts, he would say the opposite again tomorrow.
I think that’s the wrong classification. This is the great opponent of Putin.
That’s a straw man. Please, stay objective.
But if you try to see all wars as one, then you can also think about it.
Right, you think. It’s all been said.
In contrast to Crimea, Luhansk or Donetsk is also not part of Ukraine. However, there are, of course, geopolitical interconnections with corresponding interests.
That is exactly what the opinions differ. I don’t think these two events belong together.
That is why Putin would have been willing to return Luhansk and Donetsk to Ukraine in 2022, but not Crimea.
And the Palestine-Israel War belongs to that, I don’t think so.
No, that’s all right. And you ignore that because it doesn’t fit into your worldview of evil Ukraine, which is due to your homeless being supposed to have less money available.
That was actually Russia. Originally the GAZPROM line went through Crimea and the Russians did not want NATO rockets on their gas line. Crimea must be seen separately from the war in Donbas. Because:
They were the Russians.
Wrong.
And no word from you to the Crimean Peninsula. You keep ignoring the point.
Could be my advantage. I don’t care about an APA. Although I was just invited to a course. I just read what really exists.
Who really started it is a good question. The bourgeois movement “Neurussia” has replaced him. After the movement had been able to challenge independence and deploy a government, Ukraine then started fighting first.
In turn, Poroschenko was not right and he marched into the newly-sustaining states. It came to pogroms through the ASOW Brigades. And then also to the entry of war by the Russians.
Whether the Russians or the Ukrainians started it? Good question! Undoubtedly, Girkin was still Russian at that time from the base of the passport. However, he had already explained in 2014 that he had nothing to do with Russia.
Therefore, it could really be responsible for “Neurussia”. It is unclear whether “Neurussia” has formed independent states or not. Internationally probably yes, because there is no international recognition at all, but only a people, an area and a government.
In this case, even the recognition was made by Russia. However, recognition would not have been mandatory.
However, given masses I cannot judge this for reasons of my level of education, but because I simply, precisely because I was recognized as a non-Journalist journalistically, read much and analyze exactly.
I’m glad you’re right to be wrong with the name of Wagenknecht in your list. Or did your “I give you the right.” not referring to it? If not, you completely ignored the part again.
The war in Donbas began after Russia had occupied the Crimean Peninsula. And there Russian soldiers fought with them, but without a military badge. They were Russian soldiers.
You fall into the Russian propaganda and then share it hard.
And that you will then set yourself in a row with Sahra Wagenknecht, who, despite their communist attitude, understands clearly who is the true aggressor in this war, is already three.
You’re right. For example, I don’t like people to ignore the entire war in Donbas. After all, war crimes have already happened there, which are thereby harmless.