Warum aus evolutionärer Sicht sollte es lähmende Angst immer noch geben?
das effiziente setzt sich durch =Evolution,bist lähmende Angst A effizient für das Opfertier und B warum verschwindet das Phänomen nicht aus der Natur und C wäre es für den Überlebensinstinkt nicht sinnvoller fliehen oder kämpfen zu können???
Paralyzing fear usually occurs not in simple dangers but in excessive dangers.
If you encounter an excessive predator, you have the choice:
Or:
You will find yourself in a dizzying height before a abyss.
This is involuntary, so if you want to make your first bunge jump.
Even a self-killer solidifies when he meets the abyss. And here too, it is good of nature not to make this easy for the self-mother. And give him a second chance.
So there are 3 sensible actions: fighting, fleeing or just staring. If the brain fights as suicide and fleeing as impossible it will be possible to choose 3. And this is often good.
good thinking
That would be totally counterproductive…
An example of many!
I find the following video of Dr. Markus Blietz on “Evolution or Degeneration”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vF1wx-v6UME
because the theory of evolution is a complete Schmarrn…
This is definitely the top answer here… 🙂