War das ein Fehler mir die Fuji X-H2 statt der X-H2s zu kaufen da ich in der Halle immer mit ISO 6.400 oder ISO 8.000 fotografiere?

Habe Fuji Support angerufen und die meinten der Unterschied bzw. die Vorteile der X-H2s sei sehr gering durch den Sensorunterschied, dennoch lese ich immer wieder Tests in denen man hätte die X-H2s bei höheren ISO Werten vorziehen sollen. Was stimmt denn nun?

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
25 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Uneternal
1 year ago

You just bought the camera and now you’re bothering.

There is no difference if you compare both cameras with the same image size. See here:

Studio shot comparison: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com)

Let the pixel peeping and focus on photographing. If you want more noise-free images, a full format and a powerful lens would be the appropriate means and not another APS-C.

ntechde
1 year ago

Oh Christl, you should know that this is nonsense. If the lens is not strong enough, each camera (any matter what) will raise the sensitivity!

You can buy cameras as much as you want: nothing will change!

I know what I’m talking about: Take an objective with f2,8 or better and you’ll be right. Get a Voigtländer Nokton (and get used to the prices and manual focusing) or another shard with f1,2 and better!

And then separate yourself from your camera collection (or do it in the showcase – I also have one) and get a good full format cam.

And then experiment with first-class lenses – a new world is up!

ntechde
1 year ago
Reply to  christl10

“because I’m using it??????????

I don’t know what you’re doing wrong. But any other camera you buy next is subject to the same physical laws as all others!

But I’m afraid it doesn’t make much sense to discuss further, because:

  • Your camera is perfect
  • Your lenses are perfect
  • You’re perfect

What else can I say? I’m definitely not perfect – actually “imperfekt” – and I appreciate the hints of Kermit and Uneternal very much!

For such pictures (sport hall) I make a CZJ 2.8/200mm on my A7R2, have a lot of reject, but always fine pictures.

ntechde
1 year ago

It will be

ntechde
1 year ago

It’ll be my claims.

But we already know that you are perfect.

I don’t. I have to learn. a lot even!

miezepussi
1 year ago

Instead of buying a camera, you should invest your money in a photo course where the technology is explained. So that you can set up your equipment independently in the future and make settings.

possessing 10 (or more) digital cameras obviously doesn’t make you a professional.

Pialesb29
1 year ago
Reply to  christl10

What are you photographing with an APS C this must be like crazy?

In so far I would like to take a photo course here would be better than to have zig cameras that you don’t know

Photon123
1 year ago
Reply to  miezepussi

Haha I have to laugh because it’s so good 😀

ntechde
1 year ago

I’d turn the time off. 1/125 or 1/250. And if the Sporti’s are even faster, that’s what it is, six hundred forty-fourths listen to me quite unusually.

ntechde
1 year ago

Sorry Christl, I don’t think so! I know the usual sports halls and they are really well lit. Either you try to balance the motion blur with lustful exposure times or you use an almost blind shard!

Photon123
1 year ago

Then it’s not the question…then it doesn’t matter.

miezepussi
1 year ago

If you do it “very hard”, it doesn’t matter to you. Both are equally strong for you (or equally weak). That’s all right. It’s about your pictures for you.

Photon123
1 year ago

Yes, you can also know that. H2 = 40MP, H2s = 26 MP. And of course, the H2 is “more” out of it, with the H2s reduced to 26MP

miezepussi
1 year ago

well. With your knowledge, you can find out for yourself. You don’t need a laity forum.

miezepussi
1 year ago

If you look so good, you know if it’s the right camera.