When should Austria be reintegrated?
When should Austria be reunited with the rest of Germany?
When should Austria be reunited with the rest of Germany?
I'm writing a history exam tomorrow and the text we're given will have something to do with absolutism. In the third task I have to relate this source to a worksheet that we're supposed to learn. The worksheet contains the definition of absolutism, the period, the two types, etc. What exactly do you write there,…
Do wars always get names after the fact? Or also at the beginning? e.g. Suppose a "Third World War" were to break out at some point. Then one could call the war that from day one.
I live in Germany and have heard that there is compulsory military service in Austria. Since there are Austrians here, I'd be interested to know what you do/have to do during compulsory military service. What were your duties? Was it boring? What do you learn there? And maybe you even know and can explain to…
Hello, I have a question: How can I get a visa for Austria or Germany as a Japanese citizen to stay for more than six months? What criteria must be met?
How can I reunify Yugoslavia? 🇲🇪🇧🇦🇭🇷🇷🇸🇲🇰🇸🇮
Honestly as an Austrian, I must say that I am happy not to live in Germany.
In general, I would say that Austrians don’t even like it. In the end, Austria is also a nation of its own, which is historically closely connected to Germany, but not so narrow that one could grasp it as a common nation.
In the Second World War, of course, was different and it was often claimed that the two nations had to be united, but these imperialist ideas were abandoned at the end and that is also good.
Never, since history has expressed itself very clearly for the small German solution several times.
I don’t know if that’s actually possible because there’s this “nouncement” from the 50s that seems to be “valid”…
Never. Austria is an independent country. The language community doesn’t change anything.
As a German living in Austria, I know that most Austrians have no interest at all in “integrating” in Germany or in Germany. In addition, the “connection ban” in the 1955 state contract prohibits Austria from connecting to Germany. However, I dare to doubt that this would have existed in international law, the opinions in Germany and Austria should change sometime in this regard; Such a ban on connection is diametrically opposed to the right of self-determination of the peoples. However, I can also deceive myself in this relationship, as I am not an international lawyer and my opinion is therefore merely a lay opinion…
Oh!
between the 2040s and 2060s
I prefer, but I think the train has gone off in this respect.
NO? So no Austrian I know wants to be integrated back to you…
I don’t know if they want it.
Sometimes you have to force the lie to their happiness, don’t you? 🤔
That’s true, is it happiness?’:)
Well, we definitely don’t want it @JulieSmith
I thought;)
It is one of many of our world history tasks 💪🏼
For me, the question is more: why should Austria be integrated?
So my answer to your question: if both Germany and Austria have Bock on it and think it would be sensible.
Fourth option: Never
Lg
That’s bullshit!
This is the correct answer and the 7 years have also been completely successful. Drive your brown game somewhere else.
Why nonsense? Austria has always been an independent state before the 2nd WK. There’s nothing to deny. Austria and DE have 2 different cultures. If then more Bavaria should be annexed by Austria. Lg
You see that wrong! Austria was originally German until 1866, but was then pushed out by Bismarck, because he saw Prussia as a German leadership and was in the way of Austria!
Austria has long been known as a country in history as Germany 😅 so I am with you mscofield018
Lies? Then check out some history books or didn’t you watch at school? Keywords: Austria-Habsburgermonarchy.
I don’t know what you’re talking about
Now spread lies!
And in their own interest, they should never be.
What do you mean again?!
Austria was only once “united”, 1938 to 1945.
Austria was “retrieved into the empire” by the Nazis.
And Austria has been there for over 1000 years, “Germany” only since 1871……
Rather the reverse. From a German (tiutian nation) is already in the 12th Century speech. Vienna was long imperial residence of the Holy Reich. If the German-German war had assumed anno 66′ otherwise, the small German solution could have existed in an association of Austria with the rest of Germany with the exclusion of Prussia. Do you think that the Prussia would have been no more Germans?
Remember: peoples and states are two different things. For 40 years there were even three German states, Austria, West Germany and the German Democratic Republic.
The question isn’t meant seriously? Any comment is superfluous and waste of time.
Why shouldn’t she be serious?
Because you have not provided the answer that a connection should not be made.
Why Germany? Hungary would be historically correct
Sicha never liked it. Wia san ja kane Piefke. ^^
I have to give you absolutely right.
Best regards from the Piefke!
So it is
This question is extremely reactionary and also completely insane, since, apart from the 1000-year-old empire, Austria has never heard of Germany!
Yes, in the thousand-year-old HRR all German – but also the Nordic tribes – were united under an emperor.
There were not only Germans there! Although the Upper Italian cities belonged to the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, they were not Germans!
Especially since the 1000-year-old Empire had nothing to do with the Holy Roman Empire of German Nation!
By the way, Germany has only existed since 1871 and otherwise nix!
I don’t understand the discussion as a choir. Also the term “reactionary” doesn’t bother me because I am more positive about it.
Austria was in the Middle Ages settlement area of Bajuwaren, which is well known. Also here you should not misinterpret my clue: I did not write that no one would have lived there before the settlement by the Bajuwaren or that no other would have been added later. The core of the culture of almost total Austria, recognizable in language, mentality, construction, culture, etc. is unquestionably Bajuwarisch and everyone in Bavaria and Austria knows about the particular relationship between Bavaria and Austria (especially Tyrol). Only the capital of Vienna, located far east, deviates more strongly and is strongly influenced by Slavic and Hungarian as well as certain Jewish and Italian influences.
Let’s go to the question! This is explicitly about Germany! And my answer is 100%
All that comes to it is the reactionary attempt to present it differently!
It is more than questionable to represent the “East Mark” as a Bajuwaric settlement area. Austria, like Germany, is a multi-ethnic state. They have migrated from all sides, including Bavaria. Starting with the whales from the Swiss Wallis, the Slavs from the Balkans, the Bohemia and Hungary.
End of this insane crawl!
I didn’t write that either. The Holy Roman Empire was not a state of modernity, but a multiethnic medieval kingdom. It should not be forgotten, however, that this kingdom of German nation was, so was born by the German people, like the Russians, carrying Russia, although there are still many other ethnic groups.
According to the developments of 1866-71, Austria became a separate nation state independent of the German Reich, nothing changes the ethnicity of the people in the “East Mark.” There are ethnic Germans like the people in the Federal Republic of Germany and the GDR. There was also no “German-Democratic People” in the GDR.
It is also true, however, that in the long run from the Austrians a separate people could develop. This was also the case with the Dutch, who, since the Westphalian peace of 1648, were released from the HRR Reichsverband and received their own state. As a result, these original low Germans have actually developed into their own people over time. As will be the case with the Austrians, only the future can be shown.
However, the comparison with France is enormous. The East Franconia region was not a settlement area of the West Franconia region. Conversely, the Franks of regions east of the Rhine, that is to say the middle of Germany, have spread to the west in the period of international migration, subjected to the Gallo-Roman population and incorporated into their kingdom, which became West Franconia after the division by the Treaty of Verdun in 843.
But not part of Germany!
Small but fine difference!
The Kingdom of the Franks is not France, otherwise Germany would be the East Mark of France!🤪
I didn’t say anything else. Austria was Bavaria’s Bajuwarian settlement area, comparable to the Mark Brandenburg, which was mainly the Lower Saxony settlement area.
But the fact is that the territories of today’s two states were Austria and FRG parts of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.
Historically, Austria was only during the 3rd. Reichs a part of Germany and the name Ostmark comes from this time!
Everything else is historical nonsense and wishful thinking of reactionary circles!
In addition, the HRR was partly under the rule of the Austrians and the Spanish!🤷 ♂️
I already wrote that Italians lived in HRR. I understand your play. But it is just wrong that Germany and the East Mark were only part of the same empire for 7 years. So I have Thousand-year Empire consciously differently interpreted. –
Germany as a nation state has only existed since 1871, that is correct. But the Germans as people are much older and already detectable in writing documents in the Middle Ages (theodisco, tiutsche).