Vorfahrt gewähren.?
In einer der 3 Erklärungen steht: “Er möchte von der Vorfahrtsstraße abbiegen und muss euch daher die Vorfahrt gewähren.”
Meine Frage ist: ich möchte ja auch von der Vorfahrtsstraße abbiegen, daher müsste ich ja dann AUCH Vorfahrt gewähren!
it is more than stupidly formulated he wants to turn off the front-row road, so he must grant you the pre-
fakt is you just drive out and he just leaves out so this message has absolutely no value who has mist written that can tell your driving instructor once lol
who is already at the end right in front of the left because both of them leave the front-row road and thus no one has left the right-hand rule. the right rule applies to each crossing which is not marked by other signs/marking,
so here the right in front of the left
Right in front.
Well, you’d have to write about it because we’re equal, then it would be better to understand
Look at this answer
Old age has formulated it well.
Too late star is forgiven
You have a lead and priority.
The other one has priority.
What does that mean? And why is this?
correctly, the cyclist has to let go, then you can also turn.
But you didn’t explain why I was before the yellow pkw
The yellow car comes from a main road, you come from a main road, so your roads are equal. You come from the right for the yellow car.
the answer is in your link
Yes, thank you for confirming it again.:) The question is already a month ago, and I have seen a similar question today and answered it correctly. That is why this question has actually been resolved for me. Still thanks:)
I also want to turn off the driveway, because I also drive straight or leave the driveway
[The cyclist], I, [the yellow car]
The cyclist is ahead of you and therefore has priority. Then you can continue and then the yellow car. He wants to turn off the front road and must therefore provide you with the way.
Not applicable
Don’t! That’s why it’s my question!
You have to leave the cyclist in front of him because he stays on the road, but you want to leave her. The yellow car also wants to leave the driveway, but you have priority here because you come from the right.
Sure.
Okay! That’s why.
One more question, what does the user think?
It’s wrong. this is the right answer.
Hello Klever0
In this example, the cyclist has priority because he is and remains on the priority road.
Then you can drive because you’re on the priority road, even if you leave the priority road.
The last one is the yellow one. He is on the priority road, but crosses your lane so he must leave you
Greeting ́HobbyTfz
He’s also on the priority road, though he leaves them.
What? I’m crossing his lane too!
You stay on your lane, the yellow leaves his lane and crosses your lane
You’re driving straight and he’s crossing the middle line and crossing your track
We both drive at the same time and then I drive over his track or we would then bump together
But okay I think I understand now
Of course, the yellow crosses your lead and not you
No
No, you’re not going until after the place where he wants to turn. At the point where he bends, you’re still on the road.
I don’t understand: 000
Me neither.
He doesn’t bend, he’s driving straight.
But, he bends off the downhill road, in which case it is even right to blink.
This is not a discussion, the situation is clear. Those who drive straight does not flash, even if they leave a kinking road. Turn right and left, so you turn right and left even if you follow the bending road to the right or left.
It should be possible to rely on this in road traffic.
Interesting your discussion!
No, he’s going straight and he can’t flash!
Nee, he’s driving straight and doesn’t have to flash. This is why one basically flashes at a kinking road, if one follows this one
Oh, okay