Verletzung der elterlichen Aufsichtspflicht?

Mein Partner hat 3 Kinder mit seiner Ex Frau . 6j junge 8 j Mädchen und 11j junge .

sie ist ins auslandgefahren in den Urlaub (Aserbaijan) über eine Woche Kinder zu Hause gelassen sie haben Schule . Gelegentlich kommt Nachbarin schaut nach ihnen und bringt die Kinder abends ins Bett geht jedoch geht soe nach Hause wen die Kinder schlafen . Den Kinder hat sie gesagt es darf keiner wissen das sie weggefahren ist . Verletzung ihrer Aufsichtspflicht als Mutter ?

(3 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SkR1997
6 months ago

The children are too young to be alone for a whole week.

The question is just what is tactical wise to do:

  • In no case should the children get annoyed that they didn’t “piff” the mum. The children shouldn’t be able to see how mad you are on the mother. That’s what she’s doing in loyalty conflicts. But you should submit the offer that you can pick it up at any time when the mother is on vacation and that you can spend a good time together.
  • I would write to the mother very clearly that I would leave the decision to leave the children alone for so long (almost) not to say good. Offer to take the children if they want to leave.
fusselchen70
6 months ago
Reply to  Anas1234567890

Why do you accept that she is illegally receiving civil money? She lives well at the expense of the public and is not even ready to fulfil her duties as a mother.

If your partner and you are on a run, the same thing I want, I see good opportunities that the children can live with you in the future.

What are you gonna do with this woman? That’s totally wrong.

kabbes69
6 months ago

The situation is already past. What irritates me that the Elf-year-old didn’t take the phone call to ask his father for help. There is a lot of confidence here.

Those who have supplied the children in time with food and food are also not important to you. That the children were alone overnight is the least evil.

I’d try to do what’s best for the kids.

PaulPeter44
6 months ago

https://www.arag.de/rechtsschutzversicherung/familierechtsschutz/attendance supervision-eltern/

The mother knows she can’t do what she’s doing. If there’s something going on despite the neighbor, she’ll get really trouble.

I find very good what SKR 1997 says.

OlivioRod
6 months ago

She should have informed the father, and he would have to take responsibility. I assume that he also has the right of custody (and duty)

Goodnight
5 months ago

Honestly, if the new partner of the father of the children asks such questions, I feel guided by the baldness.

After my experience, is usually the new partner of the arsonists

Why doesn’t the father ask? Why are you mixing?

Can it be that the children shouldn’t say anything about you.?

When the nice neighbor wakes up the children in the morning, makes them breakfast, the children then go to school and take home at lunch or in the evening after the hort, make dinner, bring the children to bed and is reachable at night and the proximity that gives up, this goes.

Otherwise, I would like to join .

fallenstelle320
6 months ago

what’s on you. the children were supplied and there was someone who looked at the children and was close. that is no problem at all

finnistda
6 months ago

Limit, completely alone, children of age would be too young. But if the neighbor looks over regularly, I don’t think it’s so bad now.

Dichterseele
6 months ago

I would report this to the Youth Office – this mother is irresponsible!

And I’d report to the job center that she seems to be able to make a long journey abroad…

Above all, the father should apply for sole custody and take care of himself.

Mugua
6 months ago

Yeah.

And if the father knows and doesn’t do anything, it’s probably the same for him.

Mugua
6 months ago
Reply to  Anas1234567890

Then it doesn’t even happen because he didn’t know about it. That’s why I wrote “where: the father knows about it.”

AngiedieSchlaue
6 months ago

Your partner as a father could look at the right.