Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JenerDerBleibt
1 year ago

They both have the same formula, there’s no one H left. Ergo is also not decisive here. Both have a carbonyl group and are not capable of forming hydrogen bridges. Different intermolecular forces are thus also out. The only difference that remains is the steric, i.e. the spatial construction of the molecule. And he’s obviously a little better at Butanon. Probably because it has a more rigid structure. I mean, the molecule is pretty rigid and can’t twist as much as Butanal can. This makes it easier to pack especially in the solid body but also in the liquid. The molecules can stick together better.

CosmicWolf
1 year ago
Der Unterschied in den Siedepunkten zwischen Butanon (Methylethylketon) und Butanal (Butyraldehyd) kann auf ihre molekularen Strukturen und intermolekularen Kräfte zurückgeführt werden.

Butanon hat einen höheren Siedepunkt als Butanal, da es stärkere intermolekulare Kräfte ausbildet. Butanon enthält in seiner Struktur eine Carbonylgruppe (C=O), die die Bildung von Dipol-Dipol-Wechselwirkungen und Wasserstoffbrückenbindungen ermöglicht. Diese intermolekularen Kräfte müssen beim Sieden mit mehr Energie überwunden werden, was zu einem höheren Siedepunkt von Butanon führt.

Im Gegensatz dazu verfügt Butanal ebenfalls über eine Carbonylgruppe, verfügt jedoch nicht über das gleiche Potenzial zur Wasserstoffbindung wie Butanon. Die intermolekularen Kräfte in Butanal sind schwächer, was zu einem niedrigeren Siedepunkt im Vergleich zu Butanon führt.
JenerDerBleibt
1 year ago
Reply to  CosmicWolf

Two questions. Why is this written in this funny format and then still wrong?

CosmicWolf
1 year ago
Reply to  JenerDerBleibt

I was wondering about the format and why is that wrong?

JenerDerBleibt
1 year ago

Because you write that the carbonyl group allows the formation of H bridges. But you also need a donor, a positively polarized H. But you don’t. And if the intermolecular forces were actually so different in the two, the boiling point would not only differ by 5° C. These are just packing effects.

ADFischer
1 year ago

The boiling points are practically identical. The tiny difference is due to packing effects. What is important is the isomeric alcohols 2-butanol (melting point -115 °C) and 2-methyl-2-propanol (melting point +26 °C).