Veganerin im Netz beschimpft Fleischesser, warum kann Sie andere nicht selbst entscheiden lassen?
Eine Veganerin beschimpft im Internet auf öffentlicher Straße Fleischesser ( Name darf ich nicht sagen, vermutlich kennen Sie einige. Sei tritt derart penetrant auf, dass ie andere unbedingt zu ihren lebenstil verhelfen will. Ich esse weiterhin 1-2 mal die Woche Fleisch ( finde ich nicht viel). Warum kann so einer mich das nicht selbst entscheiden lassen, findet ihr sie hat recht?
(4 votes)
Loading...
She doesn’t check that she’s scaring others with this behavior.
LG
ah it is very well known 🙂
But the “rush” is rather doubtful.
Thanks for the star.
The one she might hope for.
wlelcher Fame?
Everyone decides.
She can sneak on the street as much as she wants. No one is forced to change his decision. You can stretch your shoulders and go on.
Of course everyone can decide. But what the lady does on the Internet makes her on purpose. Yes, it is basically very hard in your statements and banishes anyone from your life who is not vegan. But this is your way to carry the statement “vegan” into the world – and one thing you have to leave it, it reaches many young people with it and has moved many to rethink. I myself am not a fan of her, but rather look at videos from other vegans who are less radical.
You decide yourself! So, what is it?
Against vaccination by freaks every genre helps stroke. If it is missing and it is therefore absolutely necessary, also the message button.
The question of what someone eats does not arise. I don’t know a single user here who could write it down.
Much noise at nothing.
R. is not only a vegan but even a doctor. But for me, she’s already suffering from brain loss.
Everyone has the right to decide what he wants to eat, because man is now an ally. I will continue to feed on “normal” meat, fish and vegetables
Tolerance is the keyword.
In our society there are different ways of living, whether nutrition, sexual orientation or religion. They should be respected as long as nobody tries to impose their own opinion on others.
If someone tries to “convert” he gets contrast from me. If he makes the penetrant, he or she is for me someone who lacks fundamental resentment, that is disregarding the foundations of our liberal, democratic society. I’m gonna be sick.
No! Not “tolerance”, because “tolerate” means “support” and No Vegans have to bear something because other people prefer a different form of diet.
Ergo is the keyword RESPEKT!
Same in reverse. The vegans are the intolerant.
That is not the point here, but the only thing that I did not find the term “tolerance” in connection with the topic quite appropriate.
Do you have any problems, fine ones?
I suspect that due to her behavior of her (the vegan) thing, she is more likely to harm than beneficial.
Anyway, I’m scared. But maybe you’re going to be like that, and that kind of strikes the psyche, with constant malnutrition.
In fact, it brings many young people to rethink, you just have to listen to your community. So she’s getting what she wants. But of course, she gets from the other side (meat) much more hates than other vegan internet personalities.
I very much suspect that their comminity is completely composed of the already firmly convinced vegans and doubt that it contributes to further the idea outside the bladder. If you do, you have to convince, not split.
She doesn’t want to tell people how to live, but she wants to encourage people to secure animal lives.
To “animate” someone to do something his counterpart doesn’t want, it’s not necessary to shame someone. 🙄
Sorry, but animating looks clearly different… It’s guardianship and rush.
But you do not animate someone by insulting him, yelling and devalued. Target clearly missed. SIe harms veganism rather than that it benefits it
Of course you can decide, she can’t tell you.
There are communities where it is normalized to act aggressively against meat eaters. My guess is that these people actually do not represent the perfect lifestyle 100% and therefore others need to make life hard, conscious.
On the other hand, for many people it becomes more and more normal, “their thing”, no matter what it is, aggressive and penetrant to represent and to look at as the only right lifestyle. It is also a bit of a consequence of online communication. In this respect, I wouldn’t see it too strict. It has one opinion, which unfortunately represents it very demanding, but it also applies to many others.
You can only stay calm and say “I think about it.” You don’t lie, you don’t promise anything.
This is what everyone decides
She does this because she gets so extreme attention and can therefore spread this issue.
I also find it bad, but unfortunately it is not different when I publicly say that I am Vegan, I am often insulted or attacked.
It’s kind of a vicious circle. This kind of vegans, which is as much as the one around, destroy the reputation of all vegans.
Unfortunately, many are so aggressive and insulting, so many think that all vegans would be so and react accordingly. This drawer’s thought is really stupid, but what to do :/
Yes, I think we should all have more thoughts about living and living.
I think everyone should live as he wants, it’s their own life.
Let her do it!
As soon as she illegally harasses me, there is a ne ad and the subject is through. If she sticks to the law, she should. If you don’t want to report it.
What’s going on?
If you want to convince people that you get vegan, you should get sympathetic and understanding.
It is best to eat less meat and to support vegetarian and to taste slowly. :
Because she’s committed to something that’s important to her and has her permission.
No one is chasing you and watching you behave vegan – you can make your choices.
She doesn’t insult her is just very radical and direct and that doesn’t fit many as she looks innocent. What she says are all the facts and you can say as well as not against it, because there are no arguments that speak for eating meat except: tradition, habit, laziness and taste. These are the only valid reasons to justify their consumption of meat.
People are now biologically all-eaters, which includes meat or animal products. DAS is a reason to eat meat. Why do you think it’s so expensive to make sure to avoid nutrient deficiency in vegan diet?
Because people are not actually made for purely vegan diet. DAS is a reason for meat consumption.
This statement is not so correct. Most meat eaters have nutrient deficiency, but do not know – why? Because in meat not all the nutrients that a human needs are inside. Even though many always think that. You also need to extend your meals as a meat eater through vegetables, fruits, nuts, cereals, etc., otherwise you will not bring your nutrients together. Vegans feed themselves in part more viiiel healthier than meat eaters, as they are more conscious of nutritional values and vitamins, and also regularly go to the doctor and test the blood.
Greetings from a meat eater who likes to deal with the topic.
I don’t have a nutrient deficiency and I haven’t eaten meat for a long time. Meat also does not just eliminate any nutrient deficiency. In addition, it is not morally acceptable and everyone who sees these animals when they die would understand that. But there are now people like you who want to move away from that, who prefer to keep the suffering of these animals far away from closed doors, because they think their imagination would be enough to imagine exactly this pain.
It is difficult, but not impossible to provide a toddler with vegan diet comprehensively with the necessary nutrients. That could be added to the reasons.
Thanks for counting “taste” as a valid reason. This is undogmatic and helpful in such heated discussions.
Everyone should eat what he likes and also I
How’s it going: on the Internet on public roads, someone sworn. Either this happens in the virtual or real world!
Well, that was the important reason behind the answer. And by the way: videos on the Internet in which they insult non-Vegans on public street. So better?
Have the insects become boring again?
Why don’t you talk about the meat eater Putin?!
Incidentally, no human being is forced to be “forced” by her or anyone…;)
But again and again beautiful, such a vegan enemy image, ll?
In principle, you should be allowed to decide yourself. Life and life… does that not apply to animals?
Yes, what I never understand is that for such vegans it is quite natural and okay that predators eat other animals, eat the eggs of other animals, etc.
But people can’t do that at all? Where’s the logic…
Yes Farming is far away from animal welfare, but a prey animal suffers enormously when it is attacked, sometimes even half dead still escapes and dies painfully. But hey, this is nature and then it’s completely okay…
The difference is that people can also be different. We don’t have to kill animals to be healthy and live. Today, livestock farming is still designed for profit and not for the fact that it is not otherwise possible. So it is not possible to compare it with the suffering that the animals attach to each other (i.e. in the sense of responsibility, and not whether it is a more painful or not)
So man can reflect himself and find everything and other ways. And there are some vegans: not (only) on the suffering/life, but also on the structure according to which the economy/society works today, i.e., that is, it is produced and consumed in masses instead of measures.
This fanatic vegan is the best example of what malnutrition has for negative effects on brain performance.
She’s hurting her thing rather than using her.
On the contrary, anti-veganism is the best example of being allowed to offend others.
By the way:
Animals are not “sache” for vegans – on the contrary!
That was not an insult, but a statement – but something sarcastic, I admit. Those who insult others must also be able to put in.
Animals are not a thing – of course not. Nobody claims that.
But it’s a Caseto promote animal welfare and another Casetheir Case Insulting people who feed themselves differently than yourself.
Anyone who insults others and attacks them aggressively harms his cause only – even if it is a good thing. If you really want to change something, you need to take a diplomatic approach and clarify it, instead of just condemning it.
It is neither sensible nor possible that all vegans suddenly feed. But the restriction of meat consumption is quite desirable and no normal thinking person is for mass animal keeping under unworthy conditions.
It’s not about “hipping” or “distributing” – it’s about so much more, and it’s about fairness and justice…
Do you have to upgrade every spider and react to any furt?
Antivegans – obvious – already…;)
She’s stupid. For example, I don’t eat meat, but I don’t care what others eat
That’s the right attitude!
“I’m a vegetarian who doesn’t operate activism, all those who do that are stupid”
Huh?
I’ve never seen this before.
This must be a kind of psychosis, specifically looking for, clicking on and complaining
But hello!
– and no, fanatics are not right.