Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
35 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MrChemist
2 years ago

Of course. If we eat all the cereals, soy and so for the animals ourselves, we can even feed more than 8 billion people.

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago
Reply to  MrChemist

And would taste good

MrChemist
2 years ago

So, in my opinion, there is so much vegetable. But there’s probably enough to say without meat and cheese there’s nothing more delicious.

Random111111
2 years ago

That’s just because people eat too many taste bearers. They make our taste buds proven caputt. If you despise a month completely, a bread tastes with butter and salt completely different and delicious. Then think of a vegan curry or nuts or or

Sunako331
2 years ago

We manage to feed 72 billion a year, but with our current diet we can’t feed 8 billion people. I think the rest is self-explanatory.

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago
Reply to  Sunako331

Yes but animals = fertilizer

Sunako331
2 years ago

I don’t understand why you’re coming back with the fertilizer. Man can also fertilize with other things

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

No

Sunako331
2 years ago

You are a hopeless ignorant case

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

Yes I don’t say it’s unhealthy I just say with meat it’s healthier

Sunako331
2 years ago

What’s your problem? You’ve asked a question whether it’s possible from the crowd to feed all people only vegan and now you don’t have any answer that is based on facts correct and you’re looking at how the biggest food businessman. If you just want to press your opinion on others, you wouldn’t have to ask the question. And yes it is healthy.

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

Yes, however, it is not as healthy as a diet with meat… especially for children fatal

Sunako331
2 years ago

Oh wow I also and I am vegan

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

No, I’m not, but I’m watching exactly what I eat, so I have the most perfect blood image you can imagine plus perfect organs

Sunako331
2 years ago

You’re a nutritionist. In addition, we are able to feed on the 3 times of farm animals, and in addition an animal eats a lot more than a human.

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

Yes, however, whether this goes without farm animals I doubt strongly and vegan nutrition is not the healthiest

DerJens292
2 years ago

Even today, enough food is being produced to all 8 billion. To feed people.

In addition, renewable raw materials for biogas, as an additive to fuel, animal tensile force in countries that are too poor to afford motor vehicles and petrol, wool for warm socks and scarves, bristles for brushes, feathers for pillows, straw for hats, insulating materials and so on.

There are also countries that do not grow cereals or vegetables. More than 70% of the world’s agricultural areas are grassland and can only be used with animal husbandry.

SkR1997
2 years ago

Yeah, we did.

At present, enormous land areas are used for the cultivation of feed. In addition, you also need pasture in the next stage.

Most vegan products require significantly less land area for production than meat.

(That’s why I still don’t want to forbid any landlord to keep a few chickens on his plot and feed them with food remains.)

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago
Reply to  SkR1997

And how is this with fertilizers etc? Because being honestly vegan is not so healthy

SkR1997
2 years ago

What do you mean? For fertilization it doesn’t matter whether I feed the corn or eat it directly? Or do I make a mistake?

You asked whether vegan diet is resource-oriented. I have affirmed and noted that most vegan foods are significantly better in terms of resources than meat. This is scientific fact.

Whoever reads my answers will find that I promote a versatile diet. This can be a moderate meat consumption – but it does not have to.

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

Horse also tastes good

SkR1997
2 years ago

So I don’t know what you’re thinking – the fewest animal excretions land on the field (but, for example, in the biogas plant). With the neighboring field of my parents, only 1x per year is fertilized with manure. There are countless plant-based fertilizers and inorganic fertilizers.

Horse man is also a good fertilizer. Horseback riding clearly holds farm animals without eating them. :

A possible solution would also be genetically modified foods. These usually require less fertilizer. Here is a good video on the topic: https://www.zdf.de/show/mai-think-x-die-show/maithink-x order-102.html

Again, I’m not against meat. Only the excessive mass production of meat is harmful to the environment.

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

Yes but people do not know that it is not possible to live without animals and so I mean fertilizers… if you run mass animal husbandry you collect fertilizers if all vegans would be much less animals since no one needs them for food… and without the many cows etc. If there were almost no fertilizer for plants etc… that is to say mankind could not live completely vegan… since you certainly do not consider animals just fertilizers without them…

wickedsick05
2 years ago

No, vegan doesn’t go. As animal fertilizer falls. Vegan agriculture is up to 80% lower than oil fertilizer. With animal fertilizer only 30% lower.

Kugelflitz
2 years ago

No.

skyrim2011
2 years ago

Then mankind would probably die for malnutrition. The vegan diet is not the healthiest (e.g. B12 deficiency) and even catastrophic for infants/children you know long enough.

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago
Reply to  skyrim2011

Then directly chicken Nuggets

MrChemist
2 years ago
Reply to  skyrim2011

You can also supplement this and make the B12 without animals

skyrim2011
2 years ago
Reply to  MrChemist

True, but leading B12 is enough for children who are not in growth for a long time

Also the supply of protein, long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, calcium, iron, iodine, zinc, selenium and vitamins D and B2 can be critical

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago
Reply to  skyrim2011

First of all they rain on that they get the artificial but cows don’t get it artificial so their meat has so much. B12 Overdose dissolves blood cancer to be 100% vegan is as much unhealthy as it is not possible to overdose with normal food… because it is simply excreted by normal food. Milk is also a very good calcium source… it’s true healthier but only for the environment… for people not…

skyrim2011
2 years ago

I’m right.

And the so popular “vegan” products are often pure chemical cocktails.

There was a couple of weeks ago, I strayed everything in there. But all the vegan “Fleischimitate” must also taste and look like real so they can buy one. But this only goes with endlessly many additives from the chemical building 🙈

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

The thing is and then you often hear be vegan is healthier… I mean, if you really take the exact amount of medication but you can never take it because you take off every 3 months of blood and only on the day of blood decrease you can take it exactly afterwards no longer unhealthy… and every day how much mg you are already taken from something is not worth it… and then expensive and not good…

SevenOfNein
2 years ago

There are enough food for all people but apparently the distribution does not work. And vegan doesn’t change that.

Nockto777
2 years ago
Reply to  SevenOfNein

However, it changes, 72 billion animals could easily be equal to 10 to 20 billion people, according to how they feed, We could easily feed 10 billion (respect: I have not included things like shortage of warning, etc.)

SevenOfNein
2 years ago
Reply to  Nockto777

Also not, it lacks distribution, whether vegan or not.