Subshells of the atom?
Why?
I'm stuck for calculating the volume. Maybe one of you can help me? I'm looking for the volume of the liquid (water). My approach: The total volume of the spherical hemisphere is made up of the volume of the steel shell, the water, and the gas. I calculated the steel volume using the density (0.26…
Hello, I have been asking myself this question for a long time and have not found a suitable answer. So, a city with 120,000 inhabitants consumes approximately 2,500 kWh per year. The city is to be supplied by a power plant that can cover its electricity consumption. How much power/electricity must the power plant provide…
Hey, in the task you had to calculate the total resistance. How do I calculate this for this task?
Hello, I'm in 8th grade and need a reason why elements can't be converted into other elements. It's actually possible, but since we're only at Dalton's atomic model, I don't know what to write. Thank you for your answer
Your text has been cruelly wrong. An orbital can record 2 electrons. However, the sub-shells have one to several orbital more accurate s=1, p=3, d=5, f=7 etc. They can therefore record electrons 2, 6, 10, 14 etc.
To explain what sub-shells are, you have to pick up something further. As you may know, electrons can also be described as vibrations or waves. These can swing in the ground tone, so to speak, then they have only one waver, or as an overtone, then there are nodes where nothing swings. It was best to perform with a string instrument, but it’s bad to go over the Internet.
The shell number is accordingly the number of regions with a uniform vibration direction, which is also referred to as a sign of the wave function. The number reduced by one thus results in the number of node surfaces at which the sign changes.
In the first shell you have only one area, so no node area. In the second shell you have a knot area. And, now it’s going to be exciting, that can be spherical shells, at the 2s orbital, or a plane duch the core, at the 2p electrons. The planes are perpendicular to one another in the 3 spatial planes, so there is px, py and pz. This means that an electron cannot be at the core from which it is attracted. Of course, this is energetically unfavourable.
I don’t know if you understood a word. Therefore, I only add the indication that d-orbitals 2 and f-orbitals have 3 levels through the core, which gradually makes them “unpopular”. They are therefore 1 or 2 periods later filled, 3d in the 4th period and 4f in the 6th period.
This is due to the fact that s-electrons have a greater probability of stay than d-electrons near the core. You can look at illustrations of probability; better than in the films on the net, I can’t explain it with words.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hzv5KQ4LoM
Why questions are meaningless. Natural sciences can only establish relationships and express them in formulas. The mathematical solutions of model ideas provide the facts you mentioned.
Because the Big Bang made matter like that.