Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
47 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
isomatte
1 year ago

He can do it!

If you already live separately and he is over 18, the maintenance should actually be currently calculated according to the adjusted net income of both parents.

If he withdraws, he is currently receiving a monthly fee of 930 euros, provided that the parents would also be able to perform.

However, even if they are, he would have to have a possible entitlement to BAB – or Bafög – examined by a corresponding request, in his initial training as BAB – at the Employment Agency.

A free computer can be found on the Internet.

After the excerpt, he would have the child’s money of currently 250 euros if he was not mined by his parents. I would get maintenance at that level.

If he himself also has a net remuneration, he can normally deduct a monthly allowance of 100 euros for training-related expenses.

The rest of the net remuneration and child benefit + possibly. BAB – from the Employment Agency would be charged to this 930 euro, if it were to min. this amount, the parents would normally not have to pay any maintenance.

habakuk63
10 months ago

As a full-year-old child in his first training, he is entitled to support the parents.

The 930€, the child’s money is a part of it or has to be counted on if the parents don’t keep it.

Its training allowance, minus 100€, is also to be calculated on it. What remains to subgalt claim was transferred 50:50 by both parents and is good…..there is not much to transfer.

Kessie1
1 year ago

What you should do:

make him realize he can take off if he can pay for it himself. As long as you offer him food and logistics, you are not obliged to give him cash. In contrast to the child’s father where he does not live, who does not have that right of destination.

And the question is: what does he earn in his training?

He can divert the child’s money after the withdrawal. ABER: the child’s allowance is for parents and should pay the child’s father’s pension and the sum is higher than the child’s allowance, then the father can also make the request that he be given the child’s allowance as a child’s allowance.

Were exactly calculated from full-year or from the start of the training what can and must be paid?

And is your son aware that an excerpt is not only about the future rent? Deposit, ancillary costs, first equipment, from vacuum cleaner to dishes to washing machine etc.

In theory, the child with his own registration address would be EUR 930 per month incl. Children’s money. In practice, this can look quite different! For it is of course expected that the own training allowance will be paid (up to EUR 100) and the child’s allowance will be fully or it must be looked at whether there are priority benefits such as BAföG when it comes to schooling.

For example, if he earns EUR 800 himself, then you can give him the child’s money and say “bye and all good”.

Kessie1
1 year ago
Reply to  Peggy0815820

So he even earns EUR 700 to EUR 800 net?

Then wish him all the best! Because there’s the money from you and that’s it.

He doesn’t have to move out, you’d let him live. And the bill would be on average at EUR 700 net:

700 – 100 = 600 + 250 = 850

Difference to EUR 930 = EUR 80. But as I said, you offer him a living room. He can finance his own living space!

And if he had a cut of 800 EUR, there’s nothing like that.

He will get used to the prices in real life with his own apartment ;-).

You can give him something voluntarily, but if he already asks, I’d just put him the suitcases – if he owns his own suitcase.

GutenTag2003
1 year ago
Reply to  Kessie1

In contrast to the child’s father where he does not live, who does not have that right of destination.

Right of destination for a full year? May I be surprised?

Kessie1
1 year ago
Reply to  GutenTag2003

May you:-).

And look into the law:

If parents are to give a child who is unmarried, they may determine the nature and time in advance of the maintenance, provided that the child’s concerns are taken into account.

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__1612.html

It’s about maintenance. The right of destination does not relate to the parents determining where the full-year child lives. But they can determine whether they pay cash or natural maintenance.

The mother where the child lives has the right to decide whether it is bar or in food and logistics. The father in this case does not have it and has to pay cash.

Kessie1
1 year ago

When it comes to the father, of course, he has the right to destiny…

But this is not what the full-year child is planning to do with this question.

GutenTag2003
1 year ago

The mother where the child lives has the right to decide whether it is bar or in food and logistics.

Or not, if it were to move to the father.

Whether cash or cash benefit, in addition – in principle – consent

Kessie1
1 year ago

All good and your son may also understand what § 1602 GB means:

The dependant is only who is out of the way to entertain himself.

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__1602.html

And together with the girlfriend, he’s gonna take it off! Only he should also think about what it means to sign the rental agreement together.

And if he got himself back, you can still pay him a few euros if you want or give him something for the household like a vacuum cleaner ;-).

Kessie1
1 year ago

Some young people have to get into reality.

Show him the Düsseldorfer table:

The appropriate maintenance requirements of a student child who does not live with his parents or a parent are usually EUR 930 per month. – 3 – Düsseldorfer Table 1. January 2024 This includes up to 410 EUR for accommodation including affordable additional costs and heating (warm rental). This requirement can also be applied to a child with his own household. The amount of EUR 930 may be deviated upwards in the event of an increased demand or with regard to the situation of parents.

https://www.olg-duesseldorf.nrw.de/infos/Duesseldorfer_Table/Table-2024/2023_12_11_Duesseldorfer_Table_-2024.pdf

Explain to him that he will have to be charged up to EUR 100 and you will then transfer the child’s allowance to him.

But by §1612 BGB you have the right of destination and do NOT have to finance its withdrawal.

Then you’ll show him this page:

https://www.haufe.de/recht/familie-erbrecht/eltern-biet-kost-und-logis-an-kind-ford-unterhalt_220_221930.html

And make him aware that you’re hoping he saved enough to set up the apartment.

You’ve been more than generous to give him all the training allowance. I think he’ll see that his compensation is now pocket money.

His wish for independence is okay. But his “continuation” a wickedness!

And maybe he’d rather ask for a diversion request at the Kindergeldkasse. Benefit for you: he throws the training and you don’t know anything about it, then he pays it back – otherwise you, because you would still be the authorized person for the child benefit fund.

If he wants to become self-employment, then completely ;-).

isebise50
1 year ago

Parents are obliged to abide by their child until the first vocational training is completed.

Parents are generally free in the way of maintenance – this can be done by means of natural maintenance (cost and logistics, baggage and dress money etc.) in the parents’ house or in cash form.

Happy for you!

Nicki996
1 year ago
Reply to  isebise50

Not if the child doesn’t live at home anymore. From then on, the parents don’t have to pay him any maintenance as he stands on his own legs.

Kessie1
1 year ago
Reply to  Nicki996

Not quite right… If the excerpt is desired by parents or the child must take off because the distance to the training place is otherwise too far, then the parents must also pay – provided performance.

If the young person wants to move out without need, then this is his problem – if the parents take the necessary consideration. But then what does not mean that you have to sponsor the extract in any case.

isebise50
1 year ago
Reply to  Nicki996

In Section 1612(2) of the German Civil Code, the law stipulates that parents have the right to determine the way in which the maintenance is granted. Therefore, parents can in principle determine that the maintenance in the parent house is granted in the form of food and logistics.

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__1612.html#:~:text=(2)%20Haben%20Eltern%20unverheiratete,%20verbide%20R%C3%BCcksicht%20will be adopted.

Nicki996
1 year ago

When I read it again, I’m totally surprised. Find the whole thing really weird that children can take off at the expense of their parents. Find this in many cases unjust, but is just my personal opinion

isebise50
1 year ago

@ Kessie1: Ups, have thought you were “Nicki996” – sorry 😉

isebise50
1 year ago

@ Kessie1: Ups, have thought you were “Nicki996” – sorry 😉

isebise50
1 year ago

As there was nothing in the question, I did not address these cases.

Then we agree…

l3487171
1 year ago

Pay him out as soon as he’s pulled out and as long as the training lasts.

Kessie1
1 year ago
Reply to  l3487171

Why?

l3487171
1 year ago
Reply to  Kessie1

The costs for the maintenance are anyway. Thus the person can also have it for which it is intended and it is full-year.

Kessie1
1 year ago

;-)…Klar, you can do as well. Depends on the ratio of parents/children. But from the law there is no automatic claim. And the children can not only stop the hand and think the parents “must” but….

l3487171
1 year ago

This is now a legal perspective. I would see the more relaxed and pragmatic.

Kessie1
1 year ago

Why are the costs anyway? The child has a training allowance of up to EUR 100. Children’s money is also fully charged from 18! Thus it can cover its own needs. Mutti still transfers the child’s money and there is no more! Parents usually don’t have to finance the extract. They can make use of their right of destination and offer the maintenance as a natural maintenance – see §1612 BGB.

If they tear the child out or it has to take off because it has, for example, a training place that is not accessible from the parents’ house in a reasonable time, then it looks different. Powerful always assumed!

Nicki996
1 year ago

You definitely don’t have to pay him, child money already if he doesn’t live with you anymore. But don’t think he can find anything. If he were to work, there would be no more child allowance

GutenTag2003
1 year ago
Reply to  Nicki996

You definitely don’t have to pay him,

How do you know?

Nicki996
1 year ago
Reply to  GutenTag2003

Why would she pay for his apartment? He is old enough to earn money himself and there is no law that prescribes it to him

Nicki996
1 year ago
Reply to  Peggy0815820

As I said, the child’s money is legally his. But you don’t have to pay him

isebise50
1 year ago
Reply to  Nicki996

Of course, there is still child money in training.

Nicki996
1 year ago
Reply to  isebise50

Training. I don’t count training as a full-time job. Yeah, he’s still working, but just to finance his training. Not his life. Okay, was misunderstood by me

Nicki996
1 year ago

I go out from a normal mother-child relationship, so😅

GutenTag2003
1 year ago

but take off and then take off the parents

How do you know if living with the mother is reasonable?

Without knowing…

then take off the parents I don’t know

Approval.

Nicki996
1 year ago

Jup, but thought the law was different. I mean, why should parents come up for their children if they want to get away at their cost🤷🏼 ♂️. At home, yes, but take off and then take off the parents is just bullshit

GutenTag2003
1 year ago

Read it, to some extent yes.

That is enough to exclude a total – unrestricted – agreement.

Nicki996
1 year ago

Read it, to some extent yes. But only to a certain amount, charged with training and childcare etc. and then not necessarily in the form of money. Let’s say he gets 540€ in the training plus 200€ child benefit, then it’s only about. 200€ to which he is entitled. I doubt if that’s what he imagines.

From my personal opinion on this, I look completely different

GutenTag2003
1 year ago

Why would she pay for his apartment? He is old enough to earn money himself and there is no law that prescribes it to him

As long as he is in training, parents are still subject to maintenance.

This is true for the father, as for the mother.

Whether the cost of the accommodation has to be paid to the accommodation if accommodation can be granted as a “service” would be to be checked/clarified in individual cases.

Repwf
1 year ago

No say! He has no right to excerpt as long as he could live with you

Repwf
1 year ago
Reply to  Peggy0815820

Then let him mean

DerHans
11 months ago

Are you even able to sustain?