Durch besonders lange Flugdauer und null Crew-Gefährdung beim frontnahen Einsatz wären unbemannte Drohnen doch prädestiniert hierfür, während sich die alten Boeing-Dinosaurier nicht so lange in der Luft halten können und gleich eine Heerschar von Besatzungsmitgliedern stirbt wenn sie abgeschossen werden
(1 votes)
Loading...Was passiert, wenn man dieses kleine Loch im Flugzeug-fenster den ganzen Flug zuhält? Ich habe gehört, dass es für Druckausgleich sorgt, weil das Fenster sonst kaputt gehen kann. Kann es passieren, dass das Fenster zerspringt, wenn man es zuhält?
wird man dann angehalten oder halt rausgezogen wenn man einen rasierer (nassrasierer) im handgepäck hat? Der hat so einen kleinen schutz vor den klingen.
Also erst beim Check in mit Eurowings? Ich hätte auch bei Expedia für 12kg Aufgabegepäck 50€ zahlen können doch das ging nicht. Was mache ich den jetzt wenn ich nicht mal Handgepäck mitnehmen darf.
Hallo, Ich fliege bald das 1. mal in Urlaub und habe erfahren, dass im Handgepäck maximal 100ml Behältnisse (Flüssigkeiten) erlaubt sind. Wie schaut das im Aufgabegepäck aus? Ich werde einen großen Koffer mitnehmen. Wie viel Sonnencreme darf ich mitnehmen? Ist da eine große Flasche erlaubt oder auch nur wie im Handgepäck 100 ml Behältnisse bis…
Wenn ich beim Bund Zahnmedizin studiere, kann ich dann nach dem Studium mich selbstständig als Zahnarzt oder Kieferorthopäde machen oder muss ich beim Bund tätig sein? Danke schonmal
Was genau bedeutet THR/RED/ACC beim A320? Und was ist Acceleration? Hat das was mit dem Climb nach dem Take off zu tun damit man seine Geschwindigkeit erreicht? Danke!
In the Navy, this is due to the fact that radar drones with the performance of an E2 Hawkeye would be too large for carrier landings. In general, the size advantage of a powerful radar drone is still too low compared to a manned aircraft.
For the control team, a pure satellite connection from a 1000km wide deployment center to the drone would be too unreliable and slow.
Look at what the acronym AWACS stands for: Early Warning And Control System.
“and control”!
AWACS aircraft are not only there for clarification, but they are also flying leaders that coordinate their own aircraft. In the E-3 Sentry, 12 people sit in the “mission deck” to keep their own planes in mind, coordinate attack operations, receive status messages, issue new orders, record and forward information ( oral observations!)…
And that’s not what a computer does.
What should AWACS be used for? They have nothing to look for.
Well, you’re talking like they’re gonna land after two hours. In fact, they can remain in the air for 10 hours without air refueling and then they can of course also be refueled in the air.
It is not intended to operate AWACS aircraft so close to the front that they are exposed to fire.
___
There are already reconnaissance drones for the small-scale reconnaissance. They don’t have the task of coordinating anything, what do you think is why.
I’m aware of that, but
Orders are constantly threatened. The radio antennas can be picked up and localized; and if the opponent has a clue where he has to look, he will recognize the best camouflaged position sooner or later on satellite images. And if you know the location of a command stand, this is a high-quality target that is worth using some marching missiles. Just with manageable means destroying the complete communication structure of the opponent, the perfect opportunity for an attack.
That’s why you want to set up command stalls so that they can be moved to the speed at any time. This is still possible if technology and, if necessary, even the premises can be loaded onto a few trucks – but the entire facilities that are installed in an E-3 are not even built up to the speed and elsewhere. That’s why it’s better to be installed in a single means of transportation.
In addition, I want to see how you spontaneously, within a few hours, at the other end of the world, establish a grounded leadership. You’re just going on a plane.
By the way: It is not necessary that the radar rotates. You can also work with surface antennas, then the aircraft has to fly in a certain direction.
Makes sense
Because they haven’t been developed yet…
Well…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsMkxGZkSXY
The Global Hawk has no rotating radar with the same lookdown function as the AWACS aircraft
Do you need this Uralt technique with today’s satellite technology?
oha .. During the 1960s the US Air Force became a successor to theEC-121 ‘Warning Star’searched for a programme for the development of new technologies for an airborne surveillance system in which both Hughes and Westinghouse were working. A jet aircraft was planned as a carrier; so Douglas beat as a baseDC-8-60 and Boeing the 707-320B. The latter was selected with four TF33 engines in July 1970, the two prototypes being equipped with four TF33 (JT3D) engines for comparison testing of the two radar systems. The first flight of the two machines referred to as EC-137D took place on 9 and 10. February 1972 and the following flight trial lasted until September 1972, from which the Westinghouse AN/APY-1Radar emerged as winner. The official development of the new AWACS system as of January 1973 ran under the name E-3A Sentry. The first flight of the first pre-series model took place on 21. July 1975 and it was decided that the series model should only be equipped with four engines. In March 1977, the equipment of the 552nd Airborne Warning and Control Wing in Tinker AFB (Oklahoma) started with the first 22 series machines (designated as a “core” standard) and the two prototypes and the two pre-production machines. In the first half of the 1980s, another eight machines were put into service in an improved “standard” version with AN/APY-2-Radar.[1]
That was 45 years ago
How old are they?
Apparently, the E-3 Senty AWACS aircraft would have been scrapped by now