Umweltfreundliches Anfängerauto?
Hi,
Ich wollte mir bald mein erstes Auto zulegen. Es sollte am besten so Umweltfreundlich sein, wie es geht, da ich jedoch nicht so viel Geld habe kann ich mir ein neueres oder gar ein Elekroauto nicht leisten.
Ich hätte max. 4000€ zur Verfügung, auch wenn etwas weniger mir lieber währe. Vermutlich würde in meinem Fall dann vor allem der Sprittverbrauch eine wichtige Rolle spielen.
Einfach mal Ideen vorschlagen
LG
IMHO is the most environmentally friendly to use an already existing car: as much dirt can’t do it at all, as it gets melted and a new one is denied.
And if you have the choice: petrol, cat, euro 1+, up to 100 hp, small/light…
And drive sparingly: not too fast, no full gas, anti-cyclic drive, use air conditioning sparingly…
Make sure a regulated 3-way catalyst is on board. So everything with petrol engine from the exhaust gas standard Euro 1. If the system is operationally warm and technically intact, up to 99 percent of the pollutants are converted into non-toxic substances. It is not more environmentally friendly if you do not want an electric car.
The driving mode is also relevant. In the case of full gas and cold start, particularly many pollutants are ejected.
Nen Prius 2 VFL could be done if direction E is to go, but there are no more Cityels and Kewetts left. Or iMievs, who make 50km more difficult.
environmentally friendly is a car that is not built extra for you and that uses as little as possible with a good pollutant class. Lifestyle models such as Smart, Fiat 500 or Mini are only more expensive without providing added value. So I would choose a Renault Twingo, Mazda 2, something in the direction. .
How about that, for example?
Diesel engine without SCR system and without particle filter, NOx, – and soot slings. With environmental friendliness, such a vehicle does not have much to do.
The environment doesn’t matter. This is “just” important what he “acidifies” at 100 km…!
Keep coming to the crowd that it is set free! In the case of methane, for example, the large amounts are released, but in the atmosphere it is relatively quickly degraded, unlike CO2!
Everything’s important here.
https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/air pollution-feinpulver-nox-co2-was-ist-eigentlich-was.1773.de.html?dram:article_id=391466
And NOx is also a greenhouse gas, even with significantly higher potential. This is described here: https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trafthauspotential
Climate damage is CO2! I wouldn’t call this non-toxic…!
CO2 is nontoxic, fine dust and nitrogen oxides are toxic. The emission of which gases should be more limited?
So no matter how much CO2 is in the air??
The environment: plants, animals and people. They react very well to fine dust, whereas it does not negatively influence them when resources are consumed more quickly.
Small cars like Ford Fiesta, Mazda 2
Prius or small car with the smallest possible motor.
The smaller or weaker the engine, the higher the probability that it already “fats” during normal drive. And grease produces a lot of pollutants – read ́ the ADAC EcoTest, there it is beautifully recognizable.
https://www.otto.de/p/big-sliperauto-big-bobby-car-neo-blue-made-in-germany-C890279872/#variationId=888744868
My idea
I think we had the same thought at the same time and share the first prize.
Probably the cheapest solution 😂
sounds good
Bobby car. But of wood.