UAP, zwischen 30-50 weitere aussagen?
Hinter den Kulissen geht es weiter. Zwischenzeitlich gab es über 30 geheime Aussagen vor dem Kongress zum UAP Thema von Regierungsangestellten, angestellten bei Vertragspartnern und von Mitarbeitern des AARO. Dürfte im zusammenhang mit der Meldepflicht an der Befehlskette vorbei direkt an den Kongress stehen welche das nicht melden unter Strafe stellt ab dem 01.01.2024.
Was denkt ihr werden wir in den 2 Wochen Meldefrist die dann ab Neujahr gilt erfahren, bzw. wird es überhaupt öffentlich werden (es geht ja jetzt erstmal nur um den Kongress…. aber die zahl der Mitwisser steigt dann immens).
(1 votes)
Loading...
sore, so a pimped hype around an extinct thema attracts only the naive ones who do not manage to look over their teller edge.
and now you may as an answer to your “facts and prove” around the ears.
who are already known? Ships operating with 100 G acceleration and X-fibre sound velocity in the airspace? Source: Department of Defense of the USA / DOD
Your nod name reveals you as faithful for all nonsense about ufos. 100 G Acceleration and at Mach 3-4 melts metal; just child cram
And if it were not a targeted false info: For example, to achieve the measured accelerations, an energy expenditure of approx. 1100GW necessary, an energy level that is larger than the entire USA it consumes within this moment nationwide.
or are the measured values wrong? In addition to the hunters, however, the complete fleet association nimitz, including the USS Princeton, would have to have the most modern on board to defy missiles 1 have measured so dramatically that they would not even be able to shoot paper flyers.
If you want to discuss at professional level with evidenced things, I can give you information from official site and prestigious universities. You will abandon me as naive idotes.
1 https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/systems/an-spy-1.htm
But I want to give you more food for your opinion: I still think it is a mismeasure… but with a comprehensible reason. For me, the only way to explain all this with the known physics is to use a warp field which brings back all observations/measures completely. None of the measuring devices takes into account space-time distortions (simply because not necessary), so it seems only that the object accelerates or moves through the air without interaction). It is at least the only explanation (except fake data) that I can find for years without having to start from a new physics.
As I said, professional discussion likes. I accept even if you say it is a conspiracy and the US government lies and shows fake data. Or, of course, you present another proven opportunity. But please act-based and factual, without insulting. I’m always open for facts.
so you say the US government lies and fakes data?
Haeääääääääääääääääääääääääääää? However, this definitely hits 50.000km/h in the troposphere, and it would be gleamingly bright (plasma) and there would be an oversonic bang that could probably throw around houses near. However, these data were measured. Or it is a government conspiracy and the US government lies.