I'm completely confused. Should I capitalize "ONLY" in the following sentence?
The laughter of his companions had now become the only sound that could be heard.
(Personally, I would capitalize it, but I'm not sure.)
(1 votes)
Loading...Hello first of all, I'm currently writing my first term paper. In this context, I'm using several sources from the Federal Ministry. Since I want to discuss the impact of the EEG on my research question in more detail for my thesis, I'm using, among other things, information from the legal texts. The explanations and…
I found the following today on a grammar portal: Transitive verbs Transitive verbs are verbs that require a direct object to form a complete sentence. These verbs convey an action that is transferred to another object or person. Transitive verbs often refer to activities that involve doing, changing, or influencing something. Example: The teacher explains…
I'd like to become a member of a relief organization and want to write an email to a local group. I've addressed them with "Dear Members…". Now my question is, can I write "your group," for example, or does it have to be "your." I don't want it to sound too chummy, but "your" sounds…
1.I am waiting for the train/my friend. 2. I am waiting for the train/my friend.
What obligations did young people have in the post-war period from 1945 to 1949?
If I say “He claims that he was n’t there” that could mean (doubt) that he was there or that he had nothing to do with it, right?
If a main word comes after that, small. If not, IMZIGES is used as the main word, then big.
Does the example set raise?
Yeah, if the only one is alone. e.g.: You are the only one, or you are the only one.
“Only” is nominalized here and is therefore large.
Correction – I would write it small. I read wrong. The only one already refers to a nom, namely laughter.
Small, because it only adds “Lachen”. The sentence is quite insane. Well, maybe he has more sense in the context. But I am unclear in the sentence how a society can laugh and why this society belongs to it.
In the context, he makes sense, why small?
Nevermind
The company is its accompaniment consisting of several persons. Therefore she “heard” him and can laugh
No. I think the sentence is very bumpy. But it’s not about the only laugh that there was a tone of itself, but the only one that gave a tone of itself was laughing.
There might have been humps, screams, toothpaste, love etc. But the only thing that gave a sound was laughing.
I would write it big