In history, can one refer to text passages using the “contrast” operator, thus making comparisons between both texts, or does the operator even require this?
(2 votes)
Loading...1.Rule 1 is wrong. When adjectives are placed after the antecedent (and after the conjugated verb), they have no ending. 2.Rule 2 is correct 3.Rule 3 is wrong. You should first learn the adjectives on their own and only then learn the adjective endings.
Hello, I would be interested to know whether and why British imperialism and colonialism in Australia was more of a gain or a loss for Great Britain as a whole? So both on a short-term and long-term level? Thanks for helpful answers 🙂
I'm currently writing my fantasy book and still need a main villain. My characters all have a magical ability, and I want him to have one too. He should also want to steal people's powers somehow, but I don't know how yet. I also need a reason why he wants the abilities of every person…
Here is an example (of the 63): Claim: Hornets are more poisonous than bees and wasps Truth: "One hornet sting kills a child, seven stings kill a horse" – that's what people say. But it's not true. Hornet venom contains roughly the same active ingredients as bee and wasp venom. However, it's significantly less toxic….
Hello!
To answer your question for the first time: Yes!
The operator “transmitting” in a historical context usually requires that you compare text passages or information from different sources or texts.
This means that you are confronting information or views from two or more texts and working out similarities, differences, contrasts or parallels between them.
LG