Tagesgeldkonto Zinsen und steuererklärung?
Hallo, ich bin etwas verwirrt und versuche mich grad in das Thema einzulesen.
Ich habe seit Anfang diese Jahres ein Scalable capital Konto auf das ich Zinsen bekomme.
Ein Freistellungsauftrag ist eingerichtet.
Wenn dieser Freistellungsauftrag überschritten ist, zieht SC ja automatisch die abgeltungssteuer /kapitalertragssteuer ein und gibt diese an das FA weiter? Richtig?
Muss ich dann grundsätzlich eine Einkommenssteuererklärung machen? Und das ganze belegen?
2.ich bin von SC nur Renault bank gewechselt. Diese hat jetzt bei meiner ersten zinszahlung eine kapitalertragssteuer abgezogen.
Dabei dachte ich, dass das nur bei inländischen Banken gemacht wird.
Sind das französische Steuern oder ist das bereits die abgeltungssteuer für De?
Sprich, muss ich diese Zinsen nochmal versteuern oder hat das die Renault Bank bereits für mich getan?
3.muss ich eine steuererklärung abgeben auch wenn meine Banken automatisch die abgeltungssteuer übermitteln? Muss ich das ganze belegen?
Edit: scheinbar führt die Renault Bank meine Steuern automatisch an das fa in Deutschland ab
(2 votes)
Loading...
3. do I have to make a tax return even if my banks automatically forward the deductible tax? Do I have to prove all this?
Do I have to make an income tax statement in principle? What about all this?
In the event that you are reimbursed too much retained capital income taxes If you want to miss out, you can do without an Ek tax return!?
If you’re single, here’s an info about Average tax rate:
https://www.socialpolitik-aktuell.de/files/social policy-current/_policy fields/financing/data collection/PDF files/abbIII21a.pdf
… do I have to make a tax return even if my banks automatically transmit the deduction tax? Do I have to prove all this?
According to the Federal Financial Administration, the following applies to investments:
Greetings siola55
Yes, I gave about 36k a year…
Thus, according to the control table, you have Average tax rate of about 18% at about 36,000€ to taxable income; will mean: if you No Dedicated Ek tax return, you will waive the too much capital income tax you have retained… 😭
…the tax office is looking forward to more 🤗
Would you like to give me the evidence?
According to the Federal Financial Administration, the following applies to investments:
Is everything in the official Ek Tax Declaration Guide …
If you answer my question about the previous Ek tax return, then I can also answer you more closely. Average tax rate!
I also did not claim, but you missed the following comment:
It is also handled in practice.
At the first bank there is an exemption order which is even fully exhausted. For all capital gains, the Bank has to retain capital income tax and Solvency.
The second bank has retained KESt and SolZ directly.
The 43 (5) EStG statement is that income tax has been deducted by tax deduction. There is therefore no obligation to make an income tax declaration.
If it were different that the capital income did not fall below the tax deduction, then the capital income should be explained in accordance with 32d (3) EStG. And that is exactly what the following passage you already have in your answer means:
However, the KESt had everything right, so there was no obligation to declare income tax.
What does it have to do with me being more theoretical if I can read and apply laws on it practice-oriented, do you want to study insults and make one on a great woman?
Well, das with reading and so….
Thus, there is no SV ahead of which a duty obligation leads.
copied by bargain
PS: Your copied novels may be interesting for theorists; my answers and comments are more intended for the intern;-))
But you theorist!!! He has already taken advantage of the savings contribution at the first investment 🙁
Jo nicely past the topic or copied only by bargain
Because even exclusively Cape with tax retention, as is the case here, does not result in a duty obligation
As German broker/bank is committed.
If the tax is maintained by the bank, the deferral effect shall apply.
The Renaultbank is a German bank, more precisely the German branch of the RCI Banque S.A.
Thus German KapESt
No this does not create a duty obligation
Thank you. I thought the Renault Bank was from France.
Very stupid. As soon as I have an account abroad and this does not pay a deductible tax I am obliged to make a tax return?
Jup, as soon as capital income is available without tax retention, there is a duty to levy. This can also happen at a German bank (2 or more accounts with 1,000€ FSA each)
Right.
The Renault Bank is a bank based in Neuss in Germany.
That’s why.
German deduction tax.
Because of the capital yields no.
If there is a duty to pay for other reasons, one has to check.
German deduction tax:
Because of the capital yields no…
Unfortunately, this is not true according to the Federal Financial Administration:
Capital income, of which deferred tax has been levied, is subject to tax deduction (deduct of capital income tax).
Only capital income from which no KapESt deduction has been made shall the duty to pay.
As an additional comment.
That’s right. The word “principal” means that there is a principle. There are exceptions to this principle.
In this case, the mere fact that deducted capital yields are in principle not a duty to pay.
The exception (of the principle) exists when no wage has been paid. This is not the (basic) rule case, is actually obvious.
Thank you for the answer. I didn’t know