If one could theoretically shrink objects, they should still weigh the same as before, because one would only be reducing the distance between the atomic nucleus and the neutron and proton. Because the radius is reduced and no particles are lost, isn't this assumption correct?
^^^^^ Thanks in advance
If a scientist (for example) travels back in time to give his former self the plans for a time machine, then he already has the plans for the time machine in the future to build it. He would then no longer have to travel back in time to give his former self the blueprints. If…
Hello, My father and I have been racking our brains for some time now about string theory, or rather how strings are supposed to extend through a 10-dimensional space. What are the ten dimensions? This is how far we have come: 0. Point; 1. Line; 2. Surface; 3. Body; 4. Space, velocity This is what…
My father is a scientist, and I'm still considering a career path; my interests lie in that area… I hope my formulation is coherent…
How tall should I theoretically be if my father is 1.82m and my mother 1.62m? I'm female, currently 14 years old, and 160cm tall.
Are you more theoretical or practical? Are you satisfied with that?
If someone wanted to harm someone, and you had a thin steel cable, a hook, and a chicken, and you put the chicken on the hook and connected the hook to the steel cable, could you (theoretically) catch a wild animal that way? Because they wouldn't get it, or they usually wouldn't care if there…
I've been there four times. But today I didn't have enough time. Do I need to call? Or do I have to start over and pay the money again?
So, purely theoretically; let's say I find part of a dead falcon on the side of the road, let's say the tail. Would I theoretically be allowed to pluck the bird and take the tail feathers with me?