SX540 HS oder eos 7d+55-250mm IS?

Ich will mir jetzt mal demnächst eine Kamera fürs planespotten zulegen und ich kann mich nicht zwischen diesen beiden entscheiden. (canon eos 7d mit 55-250mm IS oder eine canon powershot sx 540 hs). Ich möchte die Flugzeuge hauptsächlich von nahen (am Boden) fotografieren, aber auch mal wenn sie ca auf 400-3000m Höhe schweben. (Budget: 350€ auf Gebraucht Markt)

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
darkhouse
1 year ago

If you take a photo with the EOS 7D and 250 mm, you can cut and enlarge the relevant area. The result should be much better than a recorded, curved and pixelated 1200 mm zoom image with the 11x smaller 1/2,3-inch 540 sensor. It looks impressive, but with the mini sensor indiscusable. Especially since you can save the image as an RAW and can rework it accordingly high quality. By the way, this is absolutely necessary for optimal utilization of the EOS 7D, because the JPEG files of the EOS 7D are also correspondingly poorer due to the compression. In my opinion, the age difference must be neglected.

darkhouse
1 year ago
Reply to  MoritzMohr

Oh, I thought you had a specific offer. In this case, I might be looking for a system camera, for example, from Sony without mirror, has the same sensor size. A used Tamron or Sigma zoom lens with 300 mm can be found for nearly 200 €. Overall, you would have to take over €350. EOS 7D is often only offered as a body around €200, so without lens. The 55-250 IS also costs 180 €. So you get out at € 360-400, but you need a smaller standard zoom (e.g., € 16-55) for everyday life. But always take something with at least APS-C sensor.

Unholdi
1 year ago

You have the most reach with the small sensor, but future-proof would probably be an EOS R model with a small sensor…

Uneternal
1 year ago
Reply to  Unholdi

You hardly get that in the price range, not even with lens.

IXXIac
1 year ago

Hello

the camera has nothing to do ?

the images then land on a smartphone or websites or possibly. also as pressure on the wall?

100erte cameras are suitable for planespotting

Point 1.) you can use the SX540 HS planespotten but no planespotter would buy this camera for planespotting. But the knowledge why or have paid “teaching money”.

Point 2.) The EFS 55-250 IS has some problem areas for airplanespotting or birding against heaven. When working in RAW/CR2, the problems are workable. Canon upgraded the EFS 55-250 IS II, but the EFS 55-250 IS STM became a good “optics”.

But let’s look at the used prices

EFS 55-250 IS > from 75€

EFS 55-250 IS II > from 125€

EFS 55-250 IS STM > from 175€

For 175€ you can also buy an EF 70-300 IS USM or a Tamron 70-300 USD VC which are more meaningful in the field of planespotting

For 175€ you can also buy a Tokina ATX 80-400 D the optics focuses as fast as the Canon Micro USM zoos and is up to 350 mm at the open panel as “sharf” as an EF 100-400 IS USM at 400mm you have to hide on 8-11. IS is nice especially for freshlings but planspots are made after a few hours of practice from the tripod.

3.) the EOS 7D is “low-loaded” at the tarpaulin spot, but there is a searcher with a matte disc where you can see the focus point and also object defects such as color spaces. EOS 60D and 50D range, but also have a smaller matte detector

Used prices

7D > 200€

5D > from 175€

60D > 150€

50D > 100€

40D > 75€

30D > 50€

20D > 25€