Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Prinzessle
1 year ago

You have your own responsibility. No matter what, you don’t just hit.

This also applies to the intrigue. If you damage someone by spreading untruths, you are responsible for it and can be displayed for call murder.

It already implies that sometimes someone does not come clear with it and reacts so desperately that he kills himself. So they drove him to death. They poisoned a relationship and broke it. Depending on that, someone loses a job through untruths about him.

So it is certainly not a harmless offence.

Prinzessle
1 year ago
Reply to  BigMoneyHeloer

The two who are re-used will be pretty sure to let the intrigues out. For he was a false serpent and brought the two to get into the hair.

You don’t need anything like that anymore in your surroundings. It was so regulated by itself.

Peppie85
1 year ago

In moral always the pett or liar, depending on whether the told is true or not.

If the dispute has been provoked by a lie, one can also speak legally of guilt. However, it is not that we say that if the Jens skins the cork on the nose, the Paul who told the Jens, the cork sleeps with the Bettina, the wife of Maik, who Paul has to pay the Maik Shcmerzensgeld.

That’s not a must.

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

The perpetrators.