Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
36 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lasdas
1 year ago

Not because the AFD made the proposal. No, before this was a question, that was my personal thoughts.

guenterhalt
1 year ago
Reply to  lasdas

but then also the same as until 1945 boys and girls separated.
Germans should also be prevented from holidays in foreign countries.

lasdas
1 year ago
Reply to  guenterhalt

That was the GDR!

guenterhalt
1 year ago

You are mistaken, of which only the countries that have been trained without compensation were affected. GDR citizens could make vacations at any time in the countries that do not belong to the thieves.

isilang
1 year ago

The relationship must be true – to many foreign, ill-understood and speaking children also affect the learning of the well-known German children. On the other hand, foreign children learn the language best when speaking.

The predominant part of a class should understand and speak well so that the other children can be well helped to learn. However, the children who have already spoken should not be affected in their linguistic development, which could be given by an excessive proportion of foreign children per class who hardly understand language and do not speak.

If the differences are too strong, separate classes would also be an option to adapt teaching to the needs.

bcords
1 year ago

Just because I don’t think of the AFD at all, but be it.

For such an application it is necessary to distinguish:

1) may the child hardly be German for migration background? In addition to German teaching, I would then find it better to teach in the mother tongue of the child (e.g. Turkish). It only works in larger cities and should not be over the full school period, but German is a foreign language for the child and in order to be able to learn foreign languages correctly it must first properly master the native language. Many children with migratory background can not properly present both languages in school to you German and in the family may be the mother tongue lived but not taught.

2) the child can hardly be German because in any way it has or has left a learning disability? In this case, it is more likely to be encouraged that the exclusion from normal teaching only promotes the exclusion of weak pupils.

Surely you can’t take as much consideration as possible for weak pupils but we should strive for a social coexistence.

I also find it class when not only Christian religion is taught in religious education, but also the contents of other beliefs, and thus I mean not only Islam. How should a child freely decide his religious belongings if not all religions are treated neutrally in teaching.

Kitharea
1 year ago

I would like to exclude Germany from all over the world because it is one of the last countries where English has not yet arrived as a world language. I would suggest you submit to every AfD follower an English test and who is too bad is shown to UK where he has to keep sheep on a farm because he cannot speak the language.

lasdas
1 year ago
Reply to  FranzDeutsch

Besatzer Language was therefore always a compulsory program in class. We had the Russians and had to learn Russian.I love my German language. You can nail this stupid English to the hat.

Kitharea
1 year ago
Reply to  FranzDeutsch

The “German people” – and then? rip in 2 generations because AfD ler and their followers cannot count 😛

Kitharea
1 year ago
Reply to  FranzDeutsch

and btw – so by the way, if you have time – and apparently have not understood – go online – open Google and learn what a metaphor is.

Kitharea
1 year ago
Reply to  FranzDeutsch

Have fun with sheep

Kitharea
1 year ago

Did I say that? Are you reading that somewhere? But the right is definitely not who will save us. I don’t think it’s logical.

lasdas
1 year ago

Of course, they’re all heads. The red/green slime is what Germany needs?

PuffPundit
1 year ago

That’s complete bullshit, but I wouldn’t have expected anything else from the AfD either.

Languages are best learned and the fastest to do with native speakers. On the contrary, the focus should be on more integration and not more separation.

kiniro
1 year ago

There would have to be a number of AfDlings, because they cannot be a sensible German.

Another language is best learned when it is heard and spoken.
It’s badly feasible in a break.

guitschee
1 year ago
Reply to  kiniro

There would have to be a number of AfDlings, because they cannot be a sensible German.

Hrm and already the proposal sounds very attractive….

Kitharea
1 year ago
Reply to  guitschee

You could also distribute brains for free and that wouldn’t help them.

Kajjo
1 year ago

This has nothing to do with the AfD.

I absolutely don’t like the AfD and can definitely exclude to choose it. Nevertheless, you have to discuss fair.

In this case, it is useful for all children involved to be informed separately according to German knowledge. that is 100% firm for me. In this respect, it is the right approach — completely independent of the fact that now the AfD also propagates this.

Kajjo
1 year ago
Reply to  FranzDeutsch

I don’t care what the AfD does.

But German skills are now crucial to follow the lessons. And native speakers suffer from the loss of time and the loss of Niveua, which arises due to lack of German knowledge. Pisa isn’t great for nothing.

Kitharea
1 year ago
Reply to  FranzDeutsch

I hope you laugh at her. Before camera

Asporc
1 year ago
Reply to  Kajjo

In this case, it is useful for all children involved if they are taught separately according to German knowledge

And how should the advantage look in your imagination?

Minou347
10 months ago
Reply to  Kajjo

I find a comprehensive and complete problem analysis essential for the joint development of solutions also more important than the elimination of a democratic discourse, just because a proposal comes from black Peter.

guenterhalt
1 year ago

But German skills are now crucial to follow the lessons.

you know how fast children learn a new language?
The teacher also has to repeat things more often, which some teachers have obviously learned. The poor Pisa results have already indicated when very few “non-mother speakers” were in the classes.
Today, however, it is more important to be able to hide behind a laptop than to really learn.

mausigertyp
1 year ago

That would be completely counterproductive. If the children learn German, they learn the language much faster and better. This is also the typical separation of people from the AfD. They just want to create a “we” and a “they” and they take it as an excuse for it.

lsp07
1 year ago

It is important to learn inclusion already in childhood.

Asporc
1 year ago

Children learn languages most easily from all.

You don’t have to teach them extra language. Just take part in normal lessons and after a year, some of them speak German without errors.

And what should the alternative look like? Should any primary school extra teachers hire the Chinese, Russich, Arabic… talk?

P4ratrooper
1 year ago

Just one thing

eli099
1 year ago

Don’t live separately. When you live together, you learn the language faster.

Leisewolke
1 year ago

everyone can learn from the other, even if the AfD doesn’t like that

guitschee
1 year ago
Reply to  Leisewolke

Then the AfD would be able to learn something if it had conciliation – of course it does not go to 😉

Kitharea
1 year ago
Reply to  Leisewolke

In a school with only AfDlern, it only needs one subject. Cheap and comfortable. Who needs Math and German when Antiethics is enough

guitschee
1 year ago

On the contrary, this is absolutely stupid – because you learn a language much faster when you have to do with native speakers!

Rosswurscht
1 year ago

Children learn from each other, not by separation. Completely next… again.

guitschee
1 year ago
Reply to  Rosswurscht

Well, but the good Franz wants a complete separation of aaaaahhhllen boöööööhsen foreigners….