Should you ask for little in a job interview when it comes to money?
If you say you want to earn that much, the employer will think, "Wow, he just wants money, and then he won't take you?" It's better to say you want little money, then the employer will think he really wants to work.
Nope.
If money is subject, you should specify an area (gross annual salary).
The area should start with the minimum amount that you would realistically start there and go up a few thousand.
This means that we have room to act. Nen job to accept in which you are underpaid brings nix and would also make a AG stubborn as to why you sell yourself in value.
ABER:
The range should be realistic, 90 to 110K as unskilled cleaning power is of course unfit. But 75 to 85K as an application developer with study or training and with professional experience can be realistic if the current AG pays, for example, 73K.
You should call the salary what you find appropriate and fair for the job or a little more if you’re still being negotiated.
How far there is room depends on the job. If I came to my job with a totally low wage, the company would think I’m completely incapable and not hire me. And even if they take me, I’d be totally dissatisfied because I actually want a lot more. So don’t get anything.
A boss who wants to have good people knows what he has to pay for it.
I used to apply in Stuttgart. Had a good job there, but I knew that I would get more at the competition because I had the knowledge of a particular type of machine for which he had been looking for long employees. I broke up and won. He then said he knew he had to fight for good people with Porsche, Daimler and Bosch, so it would have been expected.
If I had called much less, he would probably have assumed that I hadn’t been well informed, or didn’t know what I can and was worth it.
You don’t talk much about work about money. Your boss wants to pay as much as possible for workers, but not for any incompetent workers. Fewer is a big mistake. You only have to know the salary range and then pack more depending on the qualification and skills. Companies are only interested in good workers and not any tralala
That’s a completely crossed way of thinking.
There’s only one reason you work as a worker. Money.
This is aware of the AG. He won’t think you’re motivated, but you’re just misjudging your value (for Him positive).
Maybe he even thinks that you’re too stupid to understand the whole thing, and that’s why he won’t help you out.
So demand so much that it’s almost naughty and then treat.
but in school one learns that one doesn’t ask for money in an interview because it doesn’t get over well
At the first interview, I always give a desired salary for which I do the required work.
I wouldn’t start an interview, how much can I earn.
But compensation is an important issue and should be addressed.
then look at the answers of the other people here.
we have learned something different in school
I do, too. And every halfway intelligent boss/person is aware of this.
This whole talk about working because it’s fun, etc… Forget it.
yes ABER then thinks the boss you just want to work for money and takes another
Not too much. This gives the impression that you know that you are no longer worth or your work.
Since I always apply for a permanent job, the new boss must, of course, put on my current salary. I don’t want to get worse. The bosses also know that professionals with professional experience now cost money.
What are you working for? For money…you shouldn’t be too little and not too much
I’m not interested in a job for impressive little money.
Then the employer thinks: Such a stupid candidate.
I’ll tell you something. Business and working life is about money.
You should know how much your work is worth, which is about the wage
but if you were boss, you just want to take money then?
If I just want to pay Peanuts, I get monkeys