Bitcoin braucht viel Strom. Warum nicht Bitcoin verbieten? Nur für zwei Jahre bis das Problem gelöst ist.
(2 votes)
Loading...Hallo Leute, ich wollte fragen ist es möglich als Fachinformatiker für Anwendungsentwicklung 6k netto verdienen?
Da Fetch.AI nun mit zwei anderen AI Tokens zusammen gelegt werden soll, habe ich heute die Nachricht bekommen, ich solle Fetch.AI doch verkaufen. Eigentlich darf doch sowas garnicht erlaubt sein, oder ? Was ist, wenn ich dies nicht tue ? Muss ich fetch nun echt verkaufen ? Danke für alle Antworten.
Verdient ihr lieber viel Geld, verzichtet dafür aber auf Jobsicherheit oder habt ihr lieber einen sicheren Job aber verdient etwas weniger?
Steht ob. Schreibt mir gerne noch die Kosten die so normal anfallen, ich weiß kann ich alles nach lesen, aber wenn ihr es kurz hier rein schreibt, ist es schneller und übersichtlicher für mich. Danke
Was wünscht ihr sich für Gehalt, um das Leben „finanziell“ zu genießen?
Ich möchte diese Aktien verkaufen. Kann dies aber nicht tun, weil sie komischerweise nicht verfügbar sind.
Well, whoever puts a miner in the yard can heat up with him in winter. In principle, this is a loud and expensive heating fan.
You can’t forbid everything you don’t find well. Many car trips are unnecessary and the energy saving potential is not used here. Above all, how should this work, it must also be enforced. We monitor all Internet communication in advance? Then someone comes home and plugs the miner? Such an intervention in the private space for so little profit is not justified.
No, because it does not solve the problem (and should not be allowed to happen in a free democracy). On the contrary, it would be even worse because at least in the USA, BTC Miner is now used as a tool for network stabilization. Especially since there is no mining in the EU because the electricity here is much too expensive.
The mines also have to be able to obtain profitable electricity. If the prices reach the mines, they turn off from themselves or are eventually broke. So you wouldn’t achieve anything except that more freedom is abolished and the state prescribes to its citizens what they can do with their own paid electricity.
In addition, the network protects itself and leads, if necessary. Load discards if it should be critical. Then there would Miner be gone again why bans? It’s just populist actionism that doesn’t use anything.
I wouldn’t want to live in such a country. Especially since you can’t prevent BTC mining so easily. Look at China. There is still 20% of the mining and although the electricity prices are rising and the BTC price has fallen, we recently had an ETH in the hash rate.
This is wrong because you can’t count the energy consumption of Bitcoin on the transaction. The power consumption serves to protect the network or secures the value. Even if no transactions were carried out, the power consumption of Bitcoin would not change.
Bitcoin needs less power than the gaming trance, Christmas lighting or the standby devices devices in the USA. Are you going to ban all this? And if not why can a gamer use his computer and not use a miner?
You can’t forbid anyone. For Bitcoin Mining makes a large part of the income. They’ll keep going. And if a VPN would be necessary because of a ban. Then it might need more electricity.
Yes but China has also gone through it and many other countries too. Now alone is called to save electricity everywhere but a single transaction needs as much electricity as a household in 1.5 months
China has done this mainly because it has no interest in a free and non-censable network. There were cases where people have exchanged messages about the network, and of course China is not interested in not being able to censor them.
Especially since 20% of the mining is still present in China. You can’t completely forbid it.
This is wrong, see my answer.
But that may not compare us with China. China is a human rights violation country and observes people. It doesn’t work here in Germany.
Mines need a lot of electricity. Keeping Bitcoin or sending BTC does not increase the power consumption.
Therefore, such statements are simply wrong.
Because that’s not possible. Bzw you can explain it for illegal, but also not. I can remember my bitcoin via a seedphrase, for example, via a sentence, or 12 words and thus have access to all my BTC. Do you want to forbid me to remember 12 words?
If at all it is possible to forbid the mine, and this is also difficult to find out just how China could. Even in a totalitarian surveillance state, there are still considerable parts of the hashrate and that despite bans.
Even if you declare BTC illegal, you will be able to observe the emigration of tech geeks and computer scientists. This also applies to the issue of tax. So if you want to miss the last rest of the German digital economy a head shot, then you ban Bitcoin.
The US has no energy crisis. They only suffer from the high world market prices. They aren’t as stupid as we Germans who just get out of coal, gas and atom at the same time. If they want to ban the export of fossil fuels.
In Europe, bitcoin is hardly mined. If these are any hobby facilities or they are located in regions where the electricity price is damn low. There are few regions in Europe.
The vast majority of mining farms in the United States are 100% renewable. Mining hardware will be switched on or off depending on the bitcoin price and current electricity price. This means that in the United States, the overproduced electricity produced by renewable energy is used. This has enabled renewable energies to be competitive, because in Texas, where most BTC mining takes place, the state does not support renewable energies. They do not have the luxury like European colleagues and can easily compensate for their losses by subsidies, but they had to find innovative ways to harvest wind and sun economically.
This now goes to such an extent that the methane of oil drilling towers, which is too often unusable, is not simply torched, but is generated by a turbine of current, which then secures the BTC network in mining devices.
You don’t have to forbid it, because it’s going to be done by itself. Bicoin Mining is not primarily made in Europe or the USA, but electricity prices are too high, and right now.
gmta
Where then I have heard the bitcoin mining is made primarily in Texas
Bitcoin is mined mainly in China, USA plays only a minor role, Europe is not at all. There may be some areas in the USA where electricity is particularly favorable – but they do not have an energy crisis.
In the USA, even the majority of about 35% of BTC mining is [1]. How do you think that this is not primarily found in the USA? China was once number one, but that’s already over. It is not worth mentioning but at least 3% in Germany. Don’t think it’ll be done in the long term.
[1] https://ccaf.io/cbeci/mining_map
All Cypro courses are now right down, the energy prices are high.
If at all, Crypto Mining is currently only worthwhile on existing systems in absolute low-cost countries.
This country and in the United States is certainly not currently at mine. Revenue does not cover current costs.
If you have a solar system on the roof, it’ll work.
That’s okay then no electricity is taken from the power grid to all be afraid. But whether the money is enough to refinance the solar system?
In the USA, even the majority of about 35% of the BTC mining [1] and the BTC hashrate recently had its ATH [2]. I think that Mining is in any case there.
Doesn’t seem like that. The mines need to use as much as possible overproduced electricity, which they receive most from the EE operators. Must be that, otherwise the hashrates would fall for weeks.
[1] https://ccaf.io/cbeci/mining_map
[2] https://www.blockchain.com/charts/hash-rate
Some people already have one anyway, and that’s why it’s profitable. But no, I think with bitcoin alone you can’t finance a solar system.
Bitcoin and other “currencies” of this kind are not needed anyway, this is pure energy waste from the beginning – but you can’t ban everything that is pointless…
Not just the mining for a few years. Mines can also work elsewhere where there is no energy problem right now
It is not reduced in Europe anyway
Yeah, because it’s not worth it here… Apart from one has glass fiber internet and ne ordinary solar system.
Regardless of the sense or nonsense of digital currencies.
In the USA, the electricity costs 16 ct./kwh for the end customer.
The production price of 1 kwh costs approx. 3 cent, the problem is not an energy crisis itself, but a politically and ideologically motivated energy disaster.
politically and ideologically motivated energy disaster.
What do you mean?
Electricity price: 32% taxes and charges.
Fuel oil price: approx. 22% taxes
Gas price: approx. 22% taxes and charges
Petrol: approx. 40% taxes and charges
Diesel: approx. 40% taxes and charges
The high prices are under the cover coats of environmental protection, now you can put it in your shoes.
It is not because the electricity in production is too expensive, but that the politics and the money-consuming lobby are pushing prices up without a clear reason. They just pull the reasons out of their fingers. And if the crisis is over, the price is not going down.
First, you could simply limit the online zooming, streaming movies.
The energy crisis is not that big. Only nobody wants to give up his advantage.
But streaming movies and playing computer games serves for entertainment. Bitcoin Mining is superfluous to the one who earns the whole coal
And who decides what “senseful” power consumption is? Why does it make sense to use electricity for a gaming PC? Electricity is electricity for which money has been paid and you have the right to do what you want.
Work with something before you judge, because you obviously didn’t understand what bitcoin is and why it was created.
Gaming is also superfluous, except for the one who makes it. And it’s all like that. Benefits and value are subjective.
If you want a state that imposes its own will on its citizens, you should emigrate to China.
In time, you could volunteer.
If such a law comes, anarchy prevails in Germany.
Everything is right, but you can save it. Leaving a book from the library, relax.
Similarly, it would be a lot to do if there is only Internet access allowed for each house, so all of them have to use a WLan.
Of course, that would be better, but many need to relax in the evening and do something nice not exhausting
This is all by itself… Bitcoin Mining has not been worth it in Europe for years…
But if it is made political, it will have a faster effect.
you would have to on Iceland, which certainly does not go fast… probably not at all…
Yes, but: in the EU it is already banished by the electricity price… why should someone pay two euros for electricity to earn a euro for bitcoin mining? The fine would be 1€… do you understand? or am I standing on the hose?
Iceland is not in the EU