Sollen Männer ihren Führerschein erst mit 26 bekommen?

This would, of course, gradually drive the German economy into the collapse.

Men under the age of 26 account for about 13-15 % of the total population. A large proportion of this age group is in training, studying or volunteering and is not fully employed. Estimates suggest that about 30–40 % of men under 26 are employed. The labour productivity of this age group is also below average due to lower experience and often lower positions in the working life. Assuming that men under the age of 26 account for about 5-7 % of the workforce and their productivity is below average, their share of GDP could be about 3–5 % to be estimated. But this share would fall away at least half immediately if they could no longer swing. Thus, an unsustainable shrinking of the economy by 1.5 to 2.5 percent, without considering the consequences in detail.

And of these lower public budgets would of course have to higher Share flow in the strong expansion of the ÖPNV. In theory, it is possible to dismantle the subsidies to the car industry, which are not least in the form of infrastructure funds for the construction and maintenance of roads. In practice, however, the powerful autolobby would naturally prevent this, while at the same time massive political corruption The more funds intended for the ÖPNV would instead be redirected into meaningless, insanely overpriced prestige projects such as the money-burning facility Stuttgart21.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzYDgR2thEQ

And of course, a large number of trainees and students are also commuting to their training and study places. Many of them would then have to choose other vocational training, commute with the ÖPNV, move, or be unemployed. As far as they cannot be chauffeured by the girlfriend – one of the few positive effects would be social shift of power to women. Also because companies and authorities would be forced to hire young women in jobs for which mobility is required – not least with the police.

However, this shift of power “from above” would be prescribed and not “from below” demanded. So social and political conflicts would result. It’s a natural law.

It would lead to a further shortage of the already limited study and training places in the conurbation centres and a further intensification of the housing crisis, while the opposite would occur in the country. This also has a clear gender imbalance. Only positive effect, it could counteract a little of the land curse, where an excess of women could arise.

But of course it means again Less social justice, because all these disadvantages can of course be compensated better, the richer the parents are.

(Do you already know that this is the only hard, resilient knowledge from the PISA studies? The only thing that they have really betrayed us about the German school system: The chances of success of German students at the German school are statistically all the better, the richer the parents are. But I’m swooping.)

Further economic consequences:

Decrease in car purchase in younger men, an important target group for vehicle manufacturers – reduction in demand for driving tests, driving schools and other services. Companies would have greater difficulty finding mobile young employees. This means higher wages and salaries. It is good for their recipients, but this is also accompanied by a reduced productivity. And of course, it also means higher unemployment and lower professional and general satisfaction among those affected.

Social consequences: Such a regulation would be perceived as discriminatory and would create legal challenges based on equality principles. Men could start studying, training or occupation later if they depend on a driving licence for certain activities. shift of independence and growth (e.g. later excerpt from home). All of this would, of course, drive masses of those affected into the arms of the Incel/Maskus and right-radical populists. The AfD’s immediate seizure of power would be secured and that would, of course, reverse everything (except the increased corruption and other beneficial consequences).

International isolation: Germany would be perceived internationally as a male-discriminating country, which would reduce its attractiveness for immigrants and businesses and thus further accelerate the demographic collapse of the pension system.

All in all this would be a massive, radical change in the status quo and social destabilization with radical consequences, and thus the exact opposite of what the German voter has expressed since the founding of the Federal Republic as his clear will:

Stability over everything.