Sn1 reaction rate comparison?

I am currently trying to solve this problem, but I cannot think of any other reason except that A is more unstable due to the tert-butyl & opposite bromide in the cis configuration due to steric effects and thus the loss of bromide is facilitated.

Compound A experiences less steric hindrance due to the trans position and therefore requires more energy to start the Sn1 reaction.

I don't know what I'm supposed to explain in detail with an energy diagram of the Sn1 reaction (it's there as a hint). For compound A, it goes from the reactant to the intermediate with a small hill at the end, and from there, with a slightly smaller hill, down to some product. For compound B, the hill from the reactant to the intermediate is a bit higher, but from the intermediate to the product, it's identical to compound A.

Am I missing something here? Perhaps something to do with the ±M effect or ±I effect?

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MeisterRuelps, UserMod Light

Bei Cyclohexan sowie cis und Trans fällt mir sofort die 1,3 diaxiale WW ein. Bedeutet dass da etwas energetisch ungünstig ist. Zeichne mal die sesselform und du wirst sehen was ich meine