Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
33 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Daniel551980
3 months ago

Carbs incl. Sugar from as natural and whole foods as possible, e.g. vegetables, fruit, nuts, seeds, dairy products are completely harmless in normal quantities.

It becomes unhealthy when the food is processed strongly industrially and then sugar, starch or other is added.

If you move a lot in everyday life and drive sports, consumption can be a bit higher than people who move little, as the body needs the energy from sugar more for exercise and sports, and the storage is rather small.

If I take too many carbohydrates to me permanently and in the long term, the body is forced to convert this excess mainly into fat and to store it as body fat. For this purpose, the sensitive blood sugar/insulin mechanism and/or the liver (fructose/alcohol) is highly stressed, which can lead to inflammations and diseases.

To this end, it is necessary to know that every person can produce his own need for carbohydrates from birth. In principle, they are therefore initially optional and not absolutely necessary.

Rosenmary
3 months ago

Carbohydrates are first necessary.

There’s a lot and a way.

Vegetables also consist of carbohydrates, as well as sugar.

HarryHole95
3 months ago
Reply to  Rosenmary

Carbs are not necessary.

Rosenmary
3 months ago
Reply to  HarryHole95

Of course they are.

Daniel551980
3 months ago
Reply to  Rosenmary

Carbohydrates are not essential to the diet because every body from birth is able to produce its own needs.

Basic knowledge and basics of nutrition 1. hour.

Rosenmary
3 months ago
Reply to  Daniel551980

Not essential is not the same as unnecessary. How do you keep the intestine going? With constipation causing proteins or with fat?

PachamamaSquaw
3 months ago
Reply to  Rosenmary

No, carbohydrates

are not “necessary.”

Rosenmary
3 months ago

That’s what you said. Save yourself.

Daniel551980
3 months ago

I think you misunderstood me. In animal foods there are no fiber, although some also contain carbohydrates.

Ballasts are precisely there to support digestion of herbal foods. And clearly, herbal also have carbohydrates. If you want to know exactly, fiber is part of the category of carbohydrates, even if they are shown on the nutritional table.

Rosenmary
3 months ago

Nobody says they’re more important. Stay with the truth and don’t put any statements in your mouth. Planting, aha… and since when are no carbohydrates in plants? Remember, ne?

Daniel551980
3 months ago

That may be true. Nevertheless, your views do not make carbohydrates more important or essential. A human body can spend a lifetime without it. That would be completely healthy and unproblematic. Ballast substances are present precisely in foods where they can bring benefits for digestion, i.e. exclusively plant. Nature has already regulated everything for us.

Rosenmary
3 months ago

Survival and healthy feeding is not the same. People in Africa with one-sided diet also survive, just wonders.

Rosenmary
3 months ago

Of course they fall you

Daniel551980
3 months ago

I’ve never had constipation due to proteins, although I add a rather high protein content.

So our microbiom the intestinal flora works without very good. As usual we have survived millennia in regions where there were seasonal fruits, nuts, fruits and vegetables at all.

HarryHole95
3 months ago

I always have perfect chairs for Bristol-Stuhlformen-Skala type 4, i.e. ideally, thanks to the demand. At what point did I say I would feed myself without carbohydrates? And even if there are no foods with no vitamin C.

Rosenmary
3 months ago

You, I already know myself and have visited extensive nutritional advice. Have fun with constipation and diarrhea. Vitamins like C come from where?

HarryHole95
3 months ago

According to DGE, eggs are also harmful but lots of bread are great. I also have nothing against carbohydrates, they can be sensible, only the statement that they would be necessary is scientifically unstoppable. Man can also survive without carbohydrates. Only macronutrients such as proteins and fats are indispensable.

Quotes:

Carbs are not essential and could therefore be easily exchanged for fats. However, fats can only be exchanged to a limited extent against carbohydrates because the body is dependent on essential fatty acids. Proteins should not be dispensed with at all, since the individual amino acids, in addition to the elements carbon, oxygen and hydrogen, also consist of the elements nitrogen and sulfur (methionine, cysteine) and are vital.

In principle, we can live people completely without carbohydrates, they are not absolutely necessary. What our body really needs can be made by itself.

Rosenmary
3 months ago

According to DGE, too little fiber is fed to the body during a low carbohydrate diet.

HarryHole95
3 months ago

No. Do you have a source of your thesis?

norbertk62
3 months ago

rpeWeder badly still good. From my memory (can deceive me because I am not a chemist)

  • so that a muscle moves, it needs energy. It gets it from ATP (adenosine triphosphate) and disintegrates it into ADP (adenosine diphosphate) + P (phosphate). He gets energy from that.
  • He gets this from carbohydrates in a ratio of 2:1 – that’s what the blood brings into the muscle first, then it is broken. So: without KH, no movement. If you eat too much – then KH remains. The body wastes nix and builds it to fats because it cannot store KH. The fats land in the seat (or wherever).
  • Fats (from storage or food) store but energy. Meaning: from a fat (Molekül) you get (believe me) 37 units ATP. Very effective, but must be produced.
  • However, the body can only deal with KH and fats, so the digestion builds everything accordingly for consumption or storage. Some things go lighter, others heavier – but the principle remains, otherwise we would have different-colored seating and bellies.

Proteins are different: from them muscles (usw) are built. If there are more than consumed, they will be excreted. Example here: Dog jersey contains up to 30% protein content. You also need, but to burn/move is the nix. However, a muscle is only formed when there is an incentive – so training (because it would otherwise be superfluous). However, it also means: it brings nix to eat an infinite amount of protein.

Daniel551980
3 months ago
Reply to  norbertk62

ATP produces the body mainly from creatine/creatin phoshat. He’ll get it from food. Mostly, he does it himself. From the three amino acids glycine, arginine and methionine, each can produce its creatine from birth and thus its ATP itself. This has nothing to do with the energy from sugar/coal hydrates.

Otherwise you will describe the model of energy supply in the body very well. In theory, it goes on in practice, of course, several energy sources can also be used simultaneously or the transitions are flowing.

norbertk62
3 months ago
Reply to  Daniel551980

True – there are still many mechanisms in the body that you do not see at first glance. That would not be a three-line, but you could write books about it (which either no one reads or just picks out the three paragraphs that fit into his argumentation).

Still, I think it’s good that you’ve read and checked the argument – my knowledge is already a few years old – no idea whether something has changed. Thank you.

Motobiggi31
3 months ago

Carbohydrates are not basically bad or good, it comes in the way and quantity. They are an important source of energy for the body. There are various types of carbohydrates:

1. Complex carbohydrates: These are found in whole grain products, legumes, fruits and vegetables. They are rich in fiber and nutrients and are digested more slowly, leading to a more stable blood sugar level.

Two. Simple carbohydrates: These are contained in sugar and processed foods. They can quickly lead to an increase in blood sugar levels and are often less nutrient-rich.

The statement Carbohydrate are badly refuted

Lmorg
3 months ago

As with ALL: the dose does.

Too little = nix good.

Too much = nix good.

Daniel551980
3 months ago
Reply to  Lmorg

Why should be “too little”, which is not present in carbohydrates, bad.

Roguerouge
3 months ago

Bad.

There are no essential carbohydrates and there is an overuse.

There’s a lot of advertising for it and pumped in everywhere.

Anna17244
3 months ago

To add good to lose weight

pommes123385
3 months ago

necessary

Emissary
3 months ago

So sensible to ask if water or breathing is good or bad. Try to live without blood sugar, then you notice.

RubberDuck1972
3 months ago

It depends on what form you take the carbohydrates to you:

Do you eat sugar or eat rice, potatoes, noodles, bread?

HarryHole95
3 months ago

They are not necessary for survival in contrast to nutrients such as fat or protein, but also not per se bad. Do you need carbohydrates? No. Can you be helpful in a balanced diet? Yes

CookieGirl161
3 months ago

Depends on what…

Curasanus
3 months ago

are necessary